tizocAu Posted December 6, 2013 I obtained this cutting as peruvianus. What do u think. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 tizocAu Posted December 6, 2013 I think it looks like smiths kimnach. Just a bit. http://www.flickr.com/photos/msscacti/3722478050/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 BreakingBarrett Posted December 6, 2013 Looks like t.peruvianus to me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 gtarman Posted December 6, 2013 The spines look quite different to the one in the link you posted IMO. You might need to upload a couple more pics though, and at less crazy angles 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 Stillman Posted December 6, 2013 T pachanoi I reckon Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 Nemisty Posted December 6, 2013 Thats a curly one. Pach? peru? macro? Just give it a nick name it and put that on the label. This will be one of those plants that causes a never ending argument between everyone lol 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 tizocAu Posted December 6, 2013 Well the label for this one originally is lime jello peruvianus. But it's a debatable label since it looks a bit pachanoi...I'll sey it's a hybrid more so in the pachanoid side.. and less in the macro side. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 hostilis Posted December 7, 2013 I've seen those listings on ebay for the "Lime Jello Peruvianus" Looks interesting. I agree that it looks more pachanoid than peruvianoid. I suck at IDing trichs though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 zelly Posted December 7, 2013 kimnach, growing in the ground Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 tizocAu Posted December 7, 2013 U have one of those zelly? So does it or doesn't it? Close enough for me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 M S Smith Posted December 7, 2013 zelly, that Kimnach in the ground is spectacular! Can I bring my garden to your house? As for the ID on the original plant, well it's T. pachamacaruvianus of course. ~Michael~ 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 Bert&Ernie Posted December 7, 2013 As for the ID on the original plant, well it's T. pachamacaruvianus of course. ~Michael~ Best ID ever!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 tizocAu Posted December 7, 2013 I knew he was gonna say that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 zelly Posted December 7, 2013 U have one of those zelly? sure do mate.....here she is flowering Can I bring my garden to your house? Michael, I'm surprised you havent already. Surely you'd love to see some of your cherished specimens reach their fullest potential by being planted in the ground. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 tizocAu Posted December 7, 2013 Zelly so do u think she looks kimnach. The original owner labeled it peruvianus but he got it from his neighbors yard. They were just Tenants. They didn't have any information. Either way kimnach does look peruvianus. I'll keep the name lime jello. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 mutant Posted December 7, 2013 looks peruvianus enough for me! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
I obtained this cutting as peruvianus. What do u think.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites