I'm so confused why this clone is considered to be a pachanoi.
It has long spines, V notches and large areols. All these characteristics describe a peruvianus. However, it's rich green with no glaucinous (at least in my environment).
So why is it seen as a long-spined pachanoi? Is it the length of its flower tubes?
Question
Philocacti
I'm so confused why this clone is considered to be a pachanoi.
It has long spines, V notches and large areols. All these characteristics describe a peruvianus. However, it's rich green with no glaucinous (at least in my environment).
So why is it seen as a long-spined pachanoi? Is it the length of its flower tubes?
Enlighten me please.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
12 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.