Bush Turkey Posted November 3, 2011 poor dog http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/national/nicholas-modrich-and-jamie-hughes-ran-naked-along-a-street-after-taking-lsd-and-said-they-fed-the-drug-to-their-dog/story-e6frg15u-1226185232005 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Foo Posted November 3, 2011 Thats so totaly fucked. I doubt our leagle system can do justice to that bastard. I doubt anyone here cares how much acid they did. But giving your dog some? THATS FUCKING STUPID and to top it off, it gets hit by a car because of some dim witted muther ____ ..... thats just too much for me, sorry ... Anyone up for a good old fassion Lynching? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
paradox Posted November 3, 2011 drugs are bad mmkay.. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bread Filter Posted November 3, 2011 That's sad. They had only adopted the dog 5 days earlier. You can only hope the needle from the vet was quick and took the dog out of pain. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quarterflesh Posted November 3, 2011 worst couple ever! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ballzac Posted November 3, 2011 Hold on. Have they been convicted of anything. I know the article didn't once use the word "alleged", but whatever happened to "innocent until proven guilty"? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Distracted Posted November 4, 2011 Who knows if the dog even got high? Seems like they got high, let the dog out and it got hit by a car. If there's anything wrong with this picture it's that two people high as a kite on lsd were kidnapped by police and taken to the hospital. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Jeans Posted November 4, 2011 Who knows if the dog even got high? That's what I was thinking. I wonder if the couple were still affected when they said that - It wouldn't be the first time that psychedelics caused someone to become confused and say something that wasn't quite accurate! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ballzac Posted November 4, 2011 That's if Nicholas Modrich and Jamie Hughes (or is it Jaime Hughes? ) even exist. If they do, I would think that the 'journalists' reporting this would be more careful to avoid potential lawsuits. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OPP Posted November 4, 2011 Why do all the people in news articles about acid get their clothes off???? Do what you want to your own body but don't give drugs to an animal or person who does not know they are being dosed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thelema Posted November 4, 2011 mmm i love being naked on acid, rubbing talc all over my body. try it! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Francois le Danque Posted November 4, 2011 "When we got there, Modrich answered the door wearing only socks, and she was wearing pants but no shirt," wearing only socks, and ... wearing pants i ate them all, then saved the rest for later. anyway poor dog, but it probably would have been gassed anyway :S Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Psylo Posted November 4, 2011 mmm i love being naked on acid, rubbing talc all over my body. try it! I love my paws being massaged 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ballzac Posted November 4, 2011 i ate them all, then saved the rest for later. "When we got there, Modrich answered the door wearing only socks, and she was wearing pants but no shirt," Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ThunderIdeal Posted November 4, 2011 wow these stories are nearly always written by assholes but usually they can keep simple details straight. perhaps somebody should write a letter to the editor. i volunteer if anybody finds out where i have to submit it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ballzac Posted November 4, 2011 Write a letter about what? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ThunderIdeal Posted November 4, 2011 their story being all over the place, with naked clothed man-women who have their cake and eat it too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ballzac Posted November 4, 2011 It may be sloppy writing, but it still makes sense. He was wearing socks. She was wearing pants. I don't get what the issue is. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ThunderIdeal Posted November 4, 2011 (edited) oh i see, your bold text made sense of it. i thought you were pointing out that it's even stupider than we first thought. where would SAB be without your magnificent brain? first thought it said 'she was naked and she had pants' then read your bold and got 'modrich (he) was naked and she had pants', so as well as swapping decency mid sentence they swapped sex. that's why it makes sense though. it's a double-stupid, which is similar to a double-negative. i choose to walk away from this without feeling like a dumbass Edited November 4, 2011 by ThunderIdeal 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ballzac Posted November 5, 2011 it's a double-stupid, which is similar to a double-negative. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Francois le Danque Posted November 5, 2011 yeah i guess the cop or newspaper simply can't speak sensible english. not surprising. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
