Crop Circles, Worm holes, DNA manipulation

[-YT-]

My link

CROP CIRCLES EXPLAINED

Bradley York Bartholomew

The findings of the molecular biologists Dr Pjotr P. Garjajev and Dr. Vladimir Poponin of the Russian Academy of Science concerning the ‘Phantom-DNA Effect’ have a radical connection with the formation of crop circles in the United Kingdom and throughout the world in recent times. According to these scientists the DNA is emitting electromagnetic waves that continue to manifest even after the DNA sample has been removed from the experiment. Hence the name ‘Phantom-DNA Effect’. The genetic procedures being adopted by these scientists have been commented on and explained by Grazyna Fosar and Franz Bludorf in their book Vernetzte Intelligenz (1), who have put forward the theory that self-radiating balls of light often seen in the sky and mistaken for extra-terrestrial visitors are in fact a group consciousness phenomenon brought about by hypercommunication within the DNA. This theory by Fosar and Bludorf can also explain the formation of crop circles which are also commonly attributed to extra-terrestrial visitors. In addition it will be shown that the precise technology being adopted by the aforesaid scientists in Moscow represents a new energy source, previously unknown to mankind, that is capable also of creating crop circles.

The sensational discovery of the Phantom-DNA Effect by Drs. Grajajev and Poponin, as described by Fosar and Bludorf, occurred when they were attempting to measure the actual vibration pattern of a DNA sample. They illuminated this specimen DNA with a laser light that produced a typical wave pattern on a screen. However when they removed the sample the wave pattern did not completely disappear. There remained on the screen a regular wave pattern as if there was still a material sample of DNA being illuminated. A control experiment demonstrated that this secondary wave pattern must still be coming from the original DNA sample that was removed. The control experiment had no DNA sample placed in the radiation beam and only a random pattern was produced on the screen. This phantom DNA effect is always repeatable when a DNA sample is used.

Fosar and Bludorf also describe other findings of this Moscow Group particularly concerning the 90 percent of human DNA that does not code for protein synthesis, and is therefore considered to be biologically inert. They point out that these days we refer to the DNA quite naturally as a ‘genetic code’, and we look upon it as a systematic encoding of information. Yet at present main-stream geneticists remain committed to examining the DNA exclusively trough chemical processes instead of bringing in speech and linguistic analysts which would normally happen when you are attempting to decipher a code.

Not so in Moscow, however. Here the genetic code is being examined precisely as an exercise in linguistics. This is the science of the structure and construction of speech. It can be used to explore not only natural speech that has evolved in individual countries and cultures, but it can equally be applied to artificial speech, for example computer programming languages. By examining speech one ascertains the basic rules of syntax (the creation of words from letters or characters), of semantics (a study of the meaning content of words) and these together make up the foundation for a grammar. By applying this scientific form of linguistic examination to the genetic code the Moscow group have found that the DNA follows similar grammatical rules as human speech.

Albeit not the rules of a particular language ( in this case for example the Russian language), but at a more fundamental level the DNA does follow the rules that contain the common features for all languages. What they have found is that there is an essential relationship between the structure of the genetic code and all the languages of mankind. For centuries scientists have been speculating on a human protolanguage, and it may well be that Pjotr Garjajev and his colleagues in the Moscow group have actually found it.

Fosar and Bludorf tell us that we must think of the normal relationship in reverse. The structure of DNA does not correspond to human speech structures, but all human language rather follow the pattern of the genetic code. After all DNA and the genetic code existed long before the first human uttered the first word. So the human languages that have evolved since the advent of humans must have followed the grand pattern that was already laid out in the structure of the genetic code.

Fosar and Bludorf warn us that this is not a question of an orthodox material worldview, according to which the facility of speech is merely a secondary effect of being bodies constructed of proteins that are coded for in some genes. The arrangement of the elementary bases in the DNA itself follows a fixed grammar, an ethereal plan, to which our human language is analogous. That this is not a question of a bodily event is already demonstrated by the following finding of the Moscow group, namely that the analogy between the structure of the DNA and human language is particularly pronounced in the particles of the larger molecular structure that actually serve no purpose for protein synthesis.

Herein lies a revolutionary discovery for the entire field of genetics. Those who are only interested in examining the known genes, and derogatively dismissing the rest of the genome as ‘junk DNA’, are possibly missing what is really fundamental. It is truly a paradox says Fosar and Bludorf, for it is precisely the ‘dumb DNA’ that is actually speaking.

According to Pjotr Garjajev: “The majority seek to understand the principles of DNA-Biocomputers in which they refer exclusively to the DNA-Watson-Crick-Rules: A-T, G-C. That is correct, but it is not enough. The DNA-Chromosomal continuum in living systems has wave attributes, that have remained elusive to us, and that are like a computer program for the structure of organisms. The known genetic code is a code for protein synthesis, and nothing more. Living chromosomes however function just like solitonic/holographic computers using the endogenous DNA laser radiation.”

Fosar and Bludorf list some of the extraordinary consequences of this new approach to genetics which has been pioneered by the Moscow group. They were able to modulate certain frequency patterns into a laser beam in such a way as to influence the DNA frequency, that is to say they could influence the genetic information itself. It was not necessary to painstakingly decode the sequences of base pairs in the DNA, and thereby artificially formulate genetic information. Quite simply these Russian researchers were able to use the words and sentences of human language to change the information in the DNA once they had ascertained the basic structures were synonymous.

The Moscow group were able to prove this astounding procedure experimentally. DNA substance in vivo (i.e. living tissue, not in vitro) reacts to the speech modulated laser light, as well as radio waves, provided the correct frequency is found. They were able to direct the information pattern from one DNA sample onto a different sample, and thus able to effect a transmission of the genetic information. This function can be demonstrated in natural cells in various ways. Garjajev and his colleagues have already succeeded in this manner to reprogram cells with information taken from a different genome. Specifically they have managed to convert frog embryos into salamander embryos simply by exchanging the information patterns in the respective DNA. They have therefore demonstrated a radical new way of interacting and even communicating with the DNA through voice modulated laser beams. This has to be seen as a totally new form of energy which has been discovered and harnessed, that opens up virtually unlimited possibilities for the evolution of life not only on earth but in the Universe.

Fosar and Bludorf also relate the findings of the Russian physicists Alexej Dimitrijev and Vjatcheslav Djatlov. These two were commissioned by the Russian military to investigate the many sightings of self-radiating balls of light that appear regularly in Siberia on the border with China. They came to the conclusion that these UFOs were actually caused by vacuum domains where gravitational forces can change into electricity, and vice versa. This theory introduces a sensational new element into the New Physics because it opens up the possibility of hypercommunication through stable wormholes into other parts of the Universe.

The theory however has radical implications for the functioning of DNA as well. It is now known that DNA functions as a superconductor at body temperature and is able to store light and information. Fosar and Bludorf have come up with the theory that the DNA itself acts as an intelligence network which enables hypercommunication via these wormholes. Effectively then these sightings of mysterious balls of light in the Russian sky can be explained as a phenomenon based in group consciousness brought about by hypercommunication through the wormholes in the DNA. In this way they are able to explain the often reported experience of people who have seen them, that the balls of light are in various subtle ways interacting at a psychic level.

In order to demonstrate the connection between wormholes in space and wormholes in the DNA, Fosar and Bludorf refer to the theory of the Finnish physicist, Matti Pitkänen, who some years ago formulated a new theory about the construction of the universe, based on an eight-dimensional space geometry. The theory is called TGD (Topological Geometrical Dynamics). In this complex theory magnetic wormholes play a very significant biological role. In fact the innovative thrust of his theory is to establish a scientific link between Physics and Biology. His theory leads to a cosmology of sentient beings. Contained in the DNA is much more than simply the instructions for synthesizing proteins for the construction of living cells. These powerful genetic biomolecules also contain the data for the operation of magnetic wormholes as biological communication channels.

Pitkänen has come up with a genuinely new approach of incorporating the mental concepts of consciousness and perception into the New Physics. According to Pitkänen, Wormhole-Magnetic-Fields, which present as Space-Time-Layers, are contained in the normal biological material, and are excellent candidates for a physical explanation of perception. Magnetized wormholes can really be seen as the quintessential living system. Fosar and Bludorf explain that Pitkänen’s TGD theory demonstrates the long suspected connection between Gravitation and Consciousness – namely, that Gravitation and Consciousness represent antipoles. It even suggests that Gravitation is a fiction, evidenced by the fact that gravitational force can be converted into electricity (i.e. electromagnetic vibrations synonymous with brain waves) in vacuum domains. Here is the explanation how self-radiating balls of light can enter into telepathic communication with observers.

There is a lot of material on the internet concerning the ability of DNA to react to various vibrations and electromagnetic waves. Much of this material seems to be based on the findings of Popp (2) that DNA emits quantum coherent photons. The Institute of Heart Math at Boulder Creek, Colorado presents published articles concerning the modulation of DNA by heart frequencies (4). There are theories about DNA resonance actually emitting information as well as acting as antennae. In a particular experiment conducted by Vladimir Poponin it was found that DNA will cause randomly dispersed light photons in a vacuum to line up in an orderly fashion in alignment with the DNA. In other words the DNA was having an effect on the light particles that are in its external environment. Other experiments describe how DNA removed by as much as fifty miles from the biological donor will show identical and simultaneous responses to the changes in the emotional state of the donor. There is no lag time whatsoever. In other words, as argued by Fosar and Bludorf, there is a simultaneous hypercommunication within the DNA. It may be reasonably predicted that samples of DNA taken from astronauts traveling in outer space would likewise display this hypercommunication ability.

In his book, Secrets in the Fields, Freddy Silva (5) argues that the energy behind crop circles is natural, and “that an intelligent source is able to control it to a very high degree. How else can we explain a ‘natural phenomena’ that selectively avoids houses, towns, gardens, and parks? That produces hundreds of geometrical and philosophically significant shapes of great complexity? That interacts with, even reads, the minds of its human observers.”

According to Fosar and Bludorf therefore this natural energy is brought about by hypercommunication via magnetic wormholes in the DNA. The crop circle is a group consciousness phenomenon. Dr Poponin (3) himself states: “Perhaps the most important finding of these experiments is that they provide an opportunity to study vacuum substructure on strictly scientific and quantitative grounds. This is possible due to the phantom field’s intrinsic ability to couple with conventional electromagnetic fields.” This surely has to mean that the waves emanating from the DNA are resonating with external electromagnetic fields, which implies as a matter of logic that these waves from the DNA are capable of changing and directing the external electromagnetic fields. Again to quote Dr Poponin: “This model is suggested as the basis for a more general nonlinear quantum theory which may explain many of the observed subtle energy phenomena and eventually could provide a physical theory of consciousness.”

The geometrical and philosophically significant shapes of the crop circles can be explained, as pointed out by Fosar and Bludorf, in terms of Jungian archetypes in the collective unconscious. This also of course explains a very essential element of crop circle phenomena, namely that they seem to interact with the psyche of the human observers. Hypercommunication through magnetic wormholes in the DNA could not fail to impact on the psyche of persons observing the formation of these crop circles in a group consciousness experience.

Another essential characteristic of crop circles is that they appear to have been formed by some form of electromagnetic energy. According to Professor Charles Thomas (5) who visited crop circles in Wiltshire and Cornwall in 1991/92, “The process of crop circle formation in these cases appears to have produced a local magnetic anomaly detectable with a reliable instrument. One could add the comment that the anomaly appears to be linked to the direction in which the stalks are flattened and that the strength of the anomaly appears to vary with the distance from ground level. There may be a suspicion that the magnetic field is created at the time of the formation and decreases through time.” Freddy Silva documents many incidents where all sorts of electrical and mechanical equipment has malfunctioned precisely when taken into a crop circle, and then resumes normal functions as soon as it is removed from the immediate vicinity of the crop circle. The engines of aircraft flying over crop circles have even been known to malfunction. According to the theory of Fosar and Bludorf these crop circles appear precisely as a result of hypercommunication through magnetized wormholes in the DNA, and this would explain the magnetized anomalies aspect of this phenomenon.

The stem of the plants within a crop circle are bent in a manner which cannot be explained by conventional science. Crop circles have appeared in wheat, canola, barley, rye and linseed as well as many other cultivated crops. With a number of these crops any attempt to bend the stalk will result in it snapping. However all plants in a crop circle have the stem permanently bent, and yet apart from that they remain alive and well. As regards the walls of crop circles (5), “this force is capable of incising pictograms containing over a thousand elements with surgical precision, covering areas of up to 150,000 square feet, and with such unerring accuracy that ‘curtains’ of wheat one stalk wide are sometimes all that separate one circle from another. The perimeter walls resemble the seamless curve of a drum, and where inward-curving walls meet inside a design, the central point can be defined down to a single stalk.” From this description it is a abundantly clear that the force that creates these crop circles has to include precision laser beam technology. The same technology that is being used by the Moscow group in their experiments with DNA vibrations.

The floor of crop circles consists of plants that have been flattened, but are otherwise undamaged and unharmed. The flattened plants can be woven into complex spirals and swirls, and there can also be several layers of densely interwoven stalks resembling interrelated wave patterns. Generally any attempt to pry the interwoven plants apart will destroy them. The flattening process can also exhibit extraordinary selectivity. Different species of plant can be left standing amongst an otherwise flattened crop. The selectivity can even extend to plants of the same type and age which are left standing amidst flattened crop. This again recalls an aspect of these experiments on DNA by the Moscow group, where it is found that the DNA will only respond to vibrations of exactly the right frequency. It is only technology of this sophistication that can explain how some plants can be deliberately spared the flattening process on the floor of a crop circle.

Laboratory analysis (5) has revealed the crystalline structure of the flattened plants has actually been changed by some force. Even more significant is the fact that the DNA is considerably different from the plants that have not been flattened. In other words this force that has flattened the crop had the exact vibrational frequency necessary to modify the information patterns in the DNA. The laboratory analysis also found that the seeds and the germinating process of the affected plants had been changed. Although the plant itself was unharmed, this force had made substantial changes to the plants natural regenerative processes. It is suggested that this kind of change can only be brought about by tampering with the information patterns in the DNA of the plant. As regards the flattening process itself, the laboratory analysis undertaken by Dr Levengood concluded that an energy source “originating in the microwave region had boiled the water inside the plants’ nodes, effectively transforming it into steam.” Again indicating that electromagnetic waves of a certain frequency are involved, and from the statement by Dr Poponin above we know that Phantom DNA has the ability to couple with conventional electromagnetic fields. In this way the force can modify biologically inert matter such as soil and rock as well as boiling water.

Freddy Silva reviews the evidence of eye witnesses to the formation of crop circles and the most consistent observation seems to be that there appeared a ‘tube of light’. Silva himself concludes that it is something like a laser beam, and he quotes observations of the Russian metaphysician P.D. Ouspensky that the ray of light can be transformed “into a spiral, into a hollow cylinder” where the photons lie close to one another lengthwise “with two kinds of thread”. Silva concludes, “Regardless of what we call the energy inside those tubes, it seems to send a ‘code’ which tells plants what to do and when.” This light energy is clearly analogous to the voice modulated laser beam that the Moscow group is using to modify the information patterns in DNA. Putting aside for one moment the actual source of the energy, it is almost certain the energy that is creating crop circles and the energy that the Moscow group is using to modify DNA is one and the same.

There has also been many reports of a very distinctive sound that is heard when crop circles are being formed. Freddy Silva refers to the findings that music can actually cause plants to move towards or away from the source of the sound. It has also been found scientifically (3) that spiritual musical chants resonate with the DNA. Silva refers to references in ancient religious scripts that the Sanskrit language is sacred because it is ‘the language of light’, and its characters were considered to be ‘the sounds of light’. The geometrical vibrations in language were not only believed capable of harnessing the power of light, but also were capable of actually creating matter. Here again we find exactly the same principles being applied by the Moscow group using voice modulated laser beams to modify the information patterns in DNA. Sanskrit may be the source language for Indo-European languages, but obviously all language has this ability to resonate with the DNA.

Effectively the researchers in Moscow are talking to the DNA through these laser beams, and the DNA is responding. There is communication. With these crop circles the DNA is demonstrating to us how sound vibrations contained in beams of laser light can create intricate and intelligent patterns in organic external matter simply by modifying the information patterns in the genome of the plants. It may even come to pass that once the significance of crop circles is known, they will begin to contain even more sophisticated patterns to better enable us to decode the DNA.

At the conclusion of his book, Freddy Silva refers to the published channelings of a clairvoyant, Isabelle Kingston. In 1989 she had contact with a Universal Consciousness, called the Watchers. This was before much of the recent upsurge in crop circle activity. Amongst other things, she was told by the Watchers that “the energy has been put through crop circles through thought processes”. She was also informed that “this new source of energy is now being created and certain beings are being prepared to understand the messages being projected at this time. Power is being created through the intellect of the scientist, knowledge is being awakened; some scientists are very close to the answer – an energy machine. This energy is only partially linked to magnetism. It is linked to the illusion of time. Rather like thought-transference, man will be able to change the molecular structure of things, including himself. Within the energy-pattern of the circles we give you this information.”

Not long after this channeling experience by Isabelle Kingston, the crop circle activity started to appear in earnest, and around about the same time the Moscow group of scientists came together to commence their experiments with the DNA using voice modulated laser beams produced by a ‘MALVERN’ LCPS (Laser Photon Correlation Spectrometer). This laser technology – the energy machine – was literally a new form of energy which has the capacity to change the molecular structure of all things. While they were developing this energy, the divine intelligence in the DNA was creating these crop circles using exactly the same source of energy, as a means of demonstrating to us how the Universe was created in the first place, and how it may now be modified and colonized.

NOTES

1. Grazyna Fosar and Franz Bludorf. Vernetzte Intelligenz [Networked Intelligence]. Aachen: Omega, 2003.

2. Rattemeyer M., F.A. Popp. Naturwissen 68 (1981): 572.

3. Glen Rein. Biological Effects of Scalar Acoustic Energy: Modulation of DNA. Columbus, Ohio: Proc. US Psychotronics Assoc., 1998. http://www.zayra.de/rein/'>http://www.zayra.de/rein/

4. Glen Rein. Modulation of DNA by Coherent Heart Frequencies. Institute of Heart Math. http://www.zayra.de/rein

4. Dr. Vladimir Poponin. The DNA Phantom Effect: Direct Measurement of A New Field in the Vacuum Substructure. http://www.twm.co.nz/DNAPhantom.htm

5. Freddy Silva. Secrets in the Fields. Charlottesville, VA: Hampton Roads, 2002.

[spice]

And these guys wonder why no one takes them seriously.

[Alchemica]

Transcriptome profiling in Arabidopsis inflorescence stems grown under hypergravity in terms of cell walls plant hormones

Land plants rely on lignified secondary cell walls in supporting their body weight on the Earth. Although gravity influences the formation of the secondary cell walls, the regulatory mechanism of their formation by gravity is not yet understood. We carried out a comprehensive analysis of gene expression in inflorescence stems of Arabidopsis thaliana L. using microarray (22 K) to identify genes whose expression is modulated under hypergravity condition (300 g). Total RNA was isolated from the basal region of inflorescence stems of plants grown for 24 h at 300 g or 1 g. Microarray analysis showed that hypergravity up-regulated the expression of 403 genes to more than 2-fold. Hypergravity up-regulated the genes responsible for the biosynthesis or modification of cell wall components such as lignin, xyloglucan, pectin and structural proteins. In addition, hypergravity altered the expression of genes related to the biosynthesis of plant hormones such as auxin and ethylene and that of genes encoding hormone-responsive proteins. Our transcriptome profiling indicates that hypergravity influences the formation of secondary cell walls by modulating the pattern of gene expression, and that auxin and/or ethylene play an important role in signaling hypergravity stimulus.

http://linkinghub.el...273117709001999

Leaf proteomic analysis of three rice heritable mutants after seed space flight

http://linkinghub.el...273117708000719

Physiologic and metabolic responses of wheat seedlings to elevated and super-elevated carbon dioxide

http://linkinghub.el...273117708004146

Effects of geomagnetic activity and atmospheric power variations on quantitative measures of brain activity: Replication of the Azerbaijani studies

Abstract

This study replicates and extends the observations by Babayev and Allahveriyeva that changes in right hemispheric electroencephalographic activity are correlated with increases in geomagnetic activity. During the geomagnetically quiet interface between solar cycle 23 and 24 quantitative electroencephalographic (QEEG) measurements were completed for normal young adults in three separate experiments involving about 120 samples over 1.5 years. The most consistent, moderate strength correlations occurred for the changes in power within the gamma and theta ranges over the right frontal lobe. Real-time measures of atmospheric power obtained from polar orbiting satellites showed similar effects. The preferential involvement of the right frontal lobe and the regions subject to its inhibition with environmental energetic changes are consistent with the behavioural correlations historically associated with these conditions. They include increased incidence of emotional lability, erroneous reconstruction of experiences, social confrontations, and unusual perceptions.

Human dynamics -> solar activity?

Relation between the electromagnetic processes in the near-Earth space and dynamics of the biological resources in Russian Arctic

The start of the satellite era in the Space explorations led to new and more profound knowledge of the solar physics and the sources of its activity. From these points of view, it is worthy to examine again the relations between biological processes and the solar activity. We explore the relation between dynamics of the solar activity (including the solar wind) and changes in population of some species of Arctic fauna (lemmings, polar foxes, caribous, wolves, elks, etc.). The data include statistical rows of various lengths (30–80 years). The best correlation between two data sets is found when the solar wind dynamic pressure as well as variations of the total solar irradiance (i.e., level of the solar UV radiation) is taken as the space parameters. Probably the electromagnetic fields of space origin are an important factor determining dynamics of population of the Arctic fauna species.

...I like the thinking of the Rainbow Serpent: Glastonbury UK as the 3rd Eye Chakra

Edited February 25, 2010 by Alchemica

[Quill]

very interesting, cheers YT

[nabraxas]

very interesting, cheers YT

seconded.

[The Dude]

And these guys wonder why no one takes them seriously.

 

And you wonder why no one takes you seriously.

Is this a serious comment?

Is ridicule the best way for you to scientifically refute their arguments? Tell me, why is this below taking seriously? .. I think you are below taking seriously.

[Oh 'cos?]

Wow. Really interesting read.

[botanika]

And you wonder why no one takes you seriously.

Is this a serious comment?

Is ridicule the best way for you to scientifically refute their arguments? Tell me, why is this below taking seriously? .. I think you are below taking seriously.

 

Spice's comment is fair play. the article is pseudo science. UFOTV fodder. Carry on

[MORG]

The results cannot be refuted scientifically because there is no evidence to discuss!

A) Googling Dr Pjotr P. Garjajev and Dr. Vladimir Poponin provides nothing but a couple of self-referencing websites, one of which is the source for this article. They might not even exist.

An ISI Web of Science search of peer-reviewed material for these authors reveals nothing. They might not exist.

C) A search for people named "Garajejev" on the RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCE website returns no results. They don't exist. http://www.ras.ru/en/index.aspx

D) There are no references to ANY published science of any kind in that article. There is no data. There are no methods. The experiments and the authors might not exist.

This is the "Phantom-scientist effect", where things that sound vaguely scientific are emitted from a vacuum of thought, evidence and critical thinking.

If you can show me a) you actually exist, then you actually did this experiment then maybe we'll talk about the results.

And I only had to read the first paragraph to smell the stink on this...