marsha Posted March 23, 2005 what is the difference in potency of australian subs as opposed to cubenis and mexicana? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mescalito Posted March 23, 2005 The cubans and mexicans are funded by cartels? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amulte Posted March 23, 2005 :D ROFLMAO :D i love you funny bastards!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fenris Posted March 23, 2005 Is that the Australian Collins class sub? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marsha Posted March 23, 2005 hahaha this is going well! just wondering what spores to ummmm wonder about Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2b Posted March 23, 2005 quote: Is that the Australian Collins class sub? Possibly a footlong meatball ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2b Posted March 23, 2005 But seriuosly check out bluemeanie mycology they have the awnser you are looking for. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
smogs Posted March 23, 2005 mmm meatball sub... i got hooked on these when i was working 2 doors down froma subway for 2 weeks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amulte Posted March 24, 2005 ROFLMAO What ever did i used to do before reading this forum?!?!? :confused: :D Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
occidentalis Posted March 24, 2005 Hmmm... well, if you're like me, you had a life... And come on, lets give Yowie some info - after all, it's not often people from the Pilbara drop by. Subs are highly variable, especially between flushes. So you never know quite what you're going to get. Cubensis can also be variable, although most of the difference is between different strains and there is only a bit of variability between flushes for a single culture. In general, subs are seen as being 2-4 times, or around 3 times stronger than cubes. I don't know much about mexicana. [ 23. March 2005, 20:12: Message edited by: creach ] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
smogs Posted March 24, 2005 yeah ive been bad lately! any time i get a pm it emails me and i feel boliged to check all otehr posts lately ive been checking about 3 times a day! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mescalito Posted March 24, 2005 Someone told me they knew someone who married a person who wasn't a gnome and lived where our laws can't touch them and said that 5g of subs was like 7g of cubes. Though being a straight laced person with respect for our laws and my fellow man I can't verify this in any way. :D Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marsha Posted March 24, 2005 thanks guys i hear eating toadstools is dangerous but they look pretty also has anyone ever seen Gyroporus cyanescens, the blueing bolete i found quite a few growing in the southwest forrests of wa bloody amazing to wach they turn blue instantly when touched or broken. "Gyroporus cyanescens is a delicious edible mushroom. However, this is contrary to the Bolete Rule, which states that "you can safely eat any bolete EXCEPT ones that turn blue when bruised and/or have a red or orange pore surface." http://botit.botany.wisc.edu/toms_fungi/j2003alt.html [ 24. March 2005, 03:22: Message edited by: YoWiE ] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amulte Posted March 24, 2005 i find this to have been helpful when it comes to which can and cannot be eaten healthwise. http://bugs.bio.usyd.edu.au/Mycology/Anima...inSymptoms.html EDIT:-Not that i eat them, only the LEGAL ones [ 24. March 2005, 05:11: Message edited by: Amulte ] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
smogs Posted March 24, 2005 alot of the toxins in mushrooms break down if cooked throughly... but a good guide should tell u that like slipery jacks i think give you a bit of a crook gut if not cooked properly (could b wrong on that 1) and some are only bad to certain people... some are only bad when u mix it with something else like alcohol theres a mushroom that if you ingest alcohol within 24hrs of it you get violently ill... otherwise its fine my brother wants to invite people over for dinner with this mushroom and then offer beer/wine at the end (minus himself obviously) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amulte Posted March 24, 2005 Smogs - this is all hypothetically ofcourse, but does that mean some toxic ones could be ingested if prepared correctly? wow. i guess heat for eg is a ..for got the word but it starts a chemical reaction between to existing chems, then reaction and decomposition? it makes sense sort of but without prior knowledge of which can and cant, i would think it to be sensible. though i am quite far from that :D but yeah a little scarry Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
smogs Posted March 24, 2005 they get denatured... heat fucks up the structure so it doesnt inetract the same way anymore... eitehr that or heat provides energy for it to react with something else? like it oxidises or something but thats not for all toxic mushrooms... also i owuldnt recomend it... you would probably end up eitehr feeling a bit sick or with heavily over cooked mushrooms that are practically charcoal (i would end up with the latter) heh heh but there are some that are are fine just from a light fry in the pan... otehrwise they give you stomach cramps and diorhea THIS DOES NOT MEAN IF U COOK TOXIC MUSHROOMS YOU CAN EAT THEM! some of them cooking has no effect on toxicity Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
spiders Posted March 29, 2005 correction - slipperies always give me shokcing guts... Anywayz - subs are comparable to Ps.cyanescens which are the most potent Psilocybes in the world. Cubensis are generally one of the weakest Psilocybes. Mexicanna are slightly more potent than cubies, but still quite low. I look at it this way: Woodlovers are the most potent, grasslovers the middle and dung are the weakest. Then ofcourse, panaeolus are more potent than most grasslovers, so that confuses things - but if it grows on wood its usually around 4 times more potent than cubies. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mescalito Posted March 29, 2005 BM what chemical differences are there in the profile of actives that would confirm reports of mexicana's mild mannered effects compared to cubes and then onto the other side with subs/azures? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
spiders Posted April 2, 2005 Depends who you ask - Some people say its the lesser trytophan conversions that give it unique flavour, but im more along the belief that its the source of the L-trytophan (spelling?) that gives it a different feel.?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Adrian Posted April 11, 2005 I was under the impression that Panaeolus/ [Copelandia] cyanescens has been found to contain the most (2.95%) followed closely by Psilocybe azurescens (~2.5%), and Psilocybe semilanceata holds the highest average potency (~1%). I still think 1.93% for a sub is pretty bloody good. Then again, potency is not always everything to everyone i.e. size, quality & availability have their merits too Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rock n Liam Posted April 18, 2005 YoWiE: hahaha this is going well! just wondering what spores to ummmm wonder about Well i find wondering about psilocybe cubensis spores to be easier on the mind for a beginner to wonder about.Then after thoroughly thinking about cubensis a few times, one could move on to wonder about other things like an outdoor patch of azures. But all that wondering isn't easy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
spiders Posted April 19, 2005 Actually the highest known recording of psilocin/psilocybin maxima was from Psilocybe arcana, closely followed by Ps.cyanescens and Ps.azurscens. Many of these are around 2%-3% - subs are about the same. The highest from a panaeolus species was around 0.7% psilocin and 0.1% psilocybin or the other way around, i cant remember. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites