Designer Pills

[Torsten]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,...1148955,00.html

: new designer drugs are just a click away

Psychedelics legal in US but banned in UK are openly available on the internet

David McCandless

Monday February 16, 2004

The Guardian

British recreational drug users are turning to a new generation of designer class A drugs from the United States as demand for ecstasy plummets, the Guardian has established.

The majority of these new drugs are powerful synthetic psychedelics from the same chemical families as LSD, magic mushrooms and mescaline. They are too new to have enticing street names; instead their lengthy chemical names are shortened to abbreviations such as 2C-I, 4-HO-DiPT, and 5-Meo-DMT. Unlike ecstasy, methamphetamine or other synthetic recreational drugs, the new compounds are not made in illicit factories or backroom kitchen laboratories. Instead, "research chemicals", as they are euphemistically known, are synthesised by commercial labs, often based in the US, which openly sell their products on the internet.

The rapid growth in the transatlantic online trade in such chemicals has been fuelled by international differences over legality. While Britain has outlawed all of these drugs - under an amendment to the Misuse Of Drugs Act in February 2002 - they remain legal in most other countries, including the majority of EU member states. Even in the US, despite some of the most draconian anti-drug laws in the world, the bulk of research chemicals are legal to manufacture, sell, possess and consume.

With ecstasy dropping in price and popularity, users and dealers in this country are looking further afield to obtain new highs. A recent Home Office survey found that ecstasy use had dropped 21% in the last year. The street price had also dropped to an all time low of £2-£3 a pill.

But while most research chemicals are too psychedelically powerful to make it as club drugs, one, 2C-I, is rapidly gaining popularity in this country as a dance drug, thanks to some similarities in effect to MDMA, the main ingredient of ecstasy. More than 125 pills of the drug were seized by police last year, including 65 at the Glastonbury festival, and some London dealers are offering it for £10 a tablet.

British police acknowledge that the internet drugs trade is a growing problem. "It is one of our key priorities," a spokeswoman for the National Hi-Tech Crime Unit, responsible for policing internet crime, told the Guardian. "Supply of class As is one of the areas we are examining."

Most research chemicals come as crystalline white powder. They can be swallowed, snorted, smoked or injected. Some users prefer to administer them via enema.

Psychedelic stimulants such as 2C-I and 2-CT-2 induce visual hallucinations, energy surges, and euphoria. The most powerful is 5-Meo-DMT, doses of which are smaller than a grain of salt. When smoked, its effects are nearly instantaneous, propelling the user into an alternate reality, described as like "being shot out of the nozzle of an atomic cannon". The experience lasts 10 minutes.

Competitive

Online drug trading is becoming an increasingly competitive and sophisticated industry. Last month, the Guardian revealed that at least five British websites were selling cannabis online.

The leading research chemical sites compete openly to offer the purest product, the best customer service, the fastest deliveries and the lowest prices. Sophisticated e-commerce technology, electronic payment systems and next day courier services guarantee swift, effortless "one-click" transactions. Most sites offer between five and 15 different drugs, with prices ranging from $95 to $350 (about £50-£185) a gram excluding delivery. The maximum order is 5g. Customers must be over 21.

Credit cards and international money orders are accepted. Drugs like 2C-I can be shipped, via UPS or Fedex, worldwide. Next day delivery is often guaranteed. Most will ship to the UK and other EU states with one caveat: "All purchasers are responsible for compliance with any applicable city, county, state, federal or national regulations related to the purchase, possession and use of any and/or all product," reads the disclaimer on one site.

"It's very easy to get them if you know where to go and you're prepared to take the risk," said Charlie, 34, a photographer and graphic designer from south London. He calls himself a regular customer of a research chemicals company based in New York.

Every three months he buys a selection using his credit card. It usually takes three days to arrive via UPS Express. Most recently he made a repeat-order for 1g of 2,5-dimethyoxy-4-ethylthiophenethylamine (or 2-CT-2 for short), a class A psychedelic similar in effect to mescaline. It costs $175 excluding delivery.

"It's pure. You know exactly what you're getting," he said.

Research chemicals are advertised online as 99% lab pure, but experts warn that that does not mean they are safe. Compared with similar drugs like LSD and magic mushrooms, which have undergone decades of informal human experimentation with relatively few direct fatalities, research chemicals are unknowns. Few human or animal toxicity studies have been carried out.

Even their proponents are at pains to point out the unpredictability and danger involved in reckless experimentation. "It is not reasonable to assume that these chemicals are in any way 'safe' to use recreationally," states the FAQ at erowid.org, the internet's biggest underground drug resource. "When you take a research chemical, you are stepping out into the unknown, and you could be the unfortunate person to discover a new drug's lethal dose."

Safety is a big issue among avid users of research chemicals. Detailed "trip reports" and harm reduction tips are shared through an extensive network of websites and bulletin boards. First time users are expected to read up on their drug of choice and start with small amounts.

Nevertheless, with active doses running to hundredths or even thousandths of a gram, overdoses triggering unexpected reactions can be a very real threat, even with electronic scales sensitive to these weights.

In October 2000, Jake Duroy, 20, from Oklahoma, snorted 35mg of a research psychedelic called 2-CT-7 he had ordered from the web. He was an experienced user but this was a massive amount of the drug to take nasally, which can greatly amplify the effect. He quickly became agitated and violent and two hours later died of a heart attack.

In April the following year, a 17-year-old died after snorting a similar amount of the same drug. A year later in July 2002, 2-CT-7 was emergency-scheduled by the US Drug Enforcement Agency. In their statement, they cited information from trip reports on the internet. After these tragedies, 2-CT-7 was removed from the online marketplace and has not reappeared.

Police warning

The EU recently recommended that member states ban 2C-I as a matter of urgency, although they turned up no evidence of large scale manufacture. The police, however, were quick to sound the alarm. "The chemicals to make this are available and it can be made pretty much anywhere," a source said.

Most research chemicals were invented by one man, Californian biochemist Dr Alexander Shulgin, 78. As an expert witness and adviser to the US Drug Enforcement Agency, he held a licence permitting him to study psychoactive drugs. Over decades, he created hundreds of new mind-altering compounds and then tested them on himself and a small coterie of fellow "psychonauts". The recipes for more than 170 of his materials were published in two biochemical cookbooks in the 1990s and now form the backbone of the research chemicals industry.

Despite the risks, Charlie is prepared to order again, although he admits he gets nervous every time. "I track them via the delivery company's website and can watch when they pass through customs safely," he said. "Then I know I can relax."

Strange and outrageous chemicals

DMT Dimethyltryptamine

Found in minute quantities in certain Amazonian plants and in the human brain. Smoked, the effects are nearly instantaneous and very strange. "The closest you'll get to experiencing death bar actually dying" as one user put it.

Dose 2-60mg

Duration Less than 10 minutes

Legal status Class A

Price £100 a gram on the street

5-Meo-DMT Methoxydimethyltryptamine

A more powerful sister compound of DMT, occurring naturally in the venom of the Bufo alvarius toad but generally smoked in synthesised form. Not uncommon for those who take large amounts to suffer psychological and emotional difficulties for weeks afterwards.

Dose 1-20mg (smaller than a grain of salt)

Duration 5-20 minutes

Legal status Class A but available to buy on the internet

Price $175 (about £90) a gram

2C-I (2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenethylamine)

Most likely candidate for the coveted title "the next ecstasy".

Powerful psychedelic stimulant described as a cross between MDMA and LSD but with much gentler side-effects. Already appearing in pill form on the UK dance scene.

Dose 10-25mg

Duration 5-8 hours

Legal status Class A but available to buy on the internet

Price $299 a gram web price; £10 a pill on the street

2-CT-2 (2,5-dimethyoxy-4-ethylthiophenethylamine)

Respected psychedelic, from the same phenethylamine family as MDMA and mescaline.

Noted for its warmth and "outrageous visuals".

Dose 10-25mg

Duration 5-8 hours

Legal status Class A but available to buy on the internet

Price $299 a gram web price; £10 a pill on the street

[theobromos]

A relatively intelligent, sane and informative article. Thumbs up for the Manchester Guardian and Mr McCandless.

[theobromos]

http://www.davidmccandless.com/

[Spurious]

What's the status of these things in Aus?

I mean in particular 2C-I

[ 16. February 2004, 21:27: Message edited by: Spurious ]

[Auxin]

Good article as far as anti-drug articles go (not TOO incorrect).

All compounds mentioned are illegal in the US though (most dont have their own individual laws, but are still illegal under the drug analog laws and some have been prosecuted as such last I heard (from a second hand source)).

I wonder if that was written by a geologist- who else would call 5-MeO-DMT (a compound that predates the human race, and whos use by humans predates the written word) a 'new' drug- LOL!!!

[nabraxas]

spurios--as w/America i believe all those things are illegal here too under the analog laws- just like 2CB or 2CT-7

[theobromos]

If you think this is an antidrugs article then I, too, must be antidrugs. Though I would say that I am cautious and informative.

[theobromos]

Auxin, 5MeODMT is a relatively new drug in its pure state, no? Wouldn't want to confuse whole plants and crude extracts with pure chemicals now, would we?

[X. Torris]

FYI---

Nearly all of the substances covered in the article in question are not technically illegal and can be found relatively "legitimately" with ridiculous ease in the U.S.

Too right about analog acts, tho....I wouldn't want such things in my home.

X. Torris

[Auxin]

theobromos:

If you think this is an antidrugs article then I, too, must be antidrugs.

Granted by itself it is fairly neutral, but most anti-drug as well as 'non-drug' people would view it as saying the stuff is really bad and never of benefit. And I was having a pessimistic night when I wrote that.

 

theobromos:

Auxin, 5MeODMT is a relatively new drug in its pure state, no?

Yup- but then so are most drugs. Anyway, it said (or was it implied) that its a 'designer drug' as in one not occuring in nature thats chemically tailored to produce effects similar to an illegal one.

 

theobromos:

Nearly all of the substances covered in the article in question are not technically illegal... Too right about analog acts, tho

:confused: You just contradicted yourself. The analog laws are laws. Granted they dont have their very own individual laws, but blanket laws instead... but still. Just because a law isnt very enforced at the moment doesnt mean the law is nullified.

[SirLSD]

no designer drug means one designed to produce similar or enjoyable affects similar to an illegal drug but it itself is not yet illegal

[theobromos]

"most anti-drug as well as 'non-drug' people would view it as..."

These people think euphoria is evil and need more education than an article in the Guardian to help them.

For designer drugs, SirLSD, that might have been the original meaning. However, times have changed and governments are a bit more on the ball. Surely now a designer drug is any synthetic analogue of a traditional drug from natural sources.

The phrase used here, "Designer Class A Drugs" does not mean that they are primo trips but scheduled as a Class A Drug under the Misuse of Drugs Act.

[Flip]

Articles like this are disturbing and can only lead to more problems.

Here I see oversimplication of the issues that are crossing over into being incorrect. why on earth would this ass list dosages?

and opinions upon what is most desireable molecule?

The people that may read this article, are not only, going to google the most obscene vendors of RC's (and thus reward their efforts and promote MORE recklesness). they're also going to be the individuals most likely to lack the basic research and understanding of what they're attempting.. only leading to problems, ER visits and forcing illegality.

[ 22. February 2004, 09:36: Message edited by: Flip ]

[theobromos]

Yeah, and why didn't Albert Hofmann keep his mouth shut about LSD and psilocybin? Why did Osmond report his results? Then the hoi polloi wouldn't know about them and they wouldn't be illegal. Only a cabal of elite pharmacognosists would have the Philosopher's Stone.

Everybody has the potential to use these substances wisely if they are given the information.

¡Power to the People!

[theobromos]

And check out the links on the article page on the Guardian website.

[Northern Gnome]

Please excuse me for being off topic in a oblique way, but this thread is probably a good one to ask. Does anyone know when DMT became scheduled or made illegal (in the parts of the world it is) and why it was made illegal? Did people die or what?

[theobromos]

I often do right hand turns here for no apparent reason, no need to ask to be excused.

I think the UN decided it was a baddie and lots of governments followed suit. Why do they need reasons if it affects the mind? It was definitely being smoked by the time of Woodstock. The UN Convention on Psychotropic Substances mentioned it in 1971.

http://www.incb.org/e/conv/1971/index.htm

Argentina, Austria and Britain followed rapidly in 1971. Egypt 1976.

[nabraxas]

Everybody has the potential to use these substances wisely if they are given the information.

preach baby preach...i'm w/ya.

[Beatnik]

Unfortuanately i think articles like this allow people to bypass the reading and research needed to understand what they are doing. The information is free all over the net, atleast from my experience, finding it all and putting it together takes time and a little dedication. Something everyone should put in before ingesting a RC. Mainstream generalisations are nothing but trouble.

[theobromos]

If anyone is stupid enough to take research chemicals without researching them after reading IN THIS ARTICLE that some people have died perhaps we don't need such people in the meme and gene pools. They were warned, let them darwin.

Why does this article not count as research for people who are interested when you think that anything put on the net is valid? Many net articles are stupid, confused and at times malicious. This is at least well-informed and balanced.

If you are really discapacitated mentally by all means spend your life in a padded, assisted institution. I want to live in a world that lives.

My only quibble is that he did not mention PMA, the perfect example of a designer drug that should never have been made available commercially. And killed quite a few people.

[Darklight]

theobromos:

They were warned, let them darwin.

Darwin- a verb theo?

[theobromos]

To darwin (I assume he darwinned, they darwinned, but darwined is more common on a google search), not my invention.

http://www.darwinawards.com/