Jump to content
The Corroboree
at0m

Annie Dookhan, Chemist In Drug Lab Scandal, May Face More Charges

Recommended Posts

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/29/annie-dookhan-chemist-drugs-lab-charges_n_1925335.html

BOSTON -- A chemist accused of lying about drug samples she tested at a state lab could face additional charges as prosecutors and defense attorneys sift through thousands of criminal cases that could be upended by her actions.

Annie Dookhan, 34, of Franklin, was arrested Friday in a burgeoning investigation that has already led to the shutdown of the lab, the resignation of the state's public health commissioner and the release of more than a dozen drug defendants.

Many more defendants are expected to be released. Authorities say more than 1,100 inmates are serving time in cases in which Dookhan was the primary or secondary chemist.

"Annie Dookhan's alleged actions corrupted the integrity of the entire criminal justice system," state Attorney General Martha Coakley said during a news conference after Dookhan's arrest. "There are many victims as a result of this."

Dookhan faces more than 20 years in prison on charges of obstruction of justice and falsely pretending to hold a degree from a college or university. She testified under oath that she holds a master's degree in chemistry from the University of Massachusetts, but school officials say they have no record of her receiving an advanced degree or taking graduate courses there.

State police say Dookhan tested more than 60,000 drug samples involving 34,000 defendants during her nine years at the Hinton State Laboratory Institute in Boston. Defense lawyers and prosecutors are scrambling to figure out how to deal with the fallout.

Assistant Attorney General John Verner called the charges against Dookhan "preliminary" and said a "much broader" investigation is being conducted.

Verner said state police learned of Dookhan's alleged actions in July after they interviewed a chemist at the lab who said he had observed "many irregularities" in Dookhan's work.

Verner said Dookhan later acknowledged to state police that she sometimes would take 15 to 25 samples and instead of testing them all, she would test only five of them, then list them all as positive. She said that sometimes, if a sample tested negative, she would take known cocaine from another sample and add it to the negative sample to make it test positive for cocaine, Verner said.

Dookhan pleaded not guilty and was later released on $10,000 bail. She was ordered to turn over her passport, submit to GPS monitoring, and not have contact with any former or current employees of the lab.

Dookhan's relatives and attorney declined to comment after the brief hearing in Boston Municipal Court. Her next court date is Dec. 3.

The obstruction charges accuse Dookhan of lying about drug samples she analyzed at the lab in March 2011 for a Suffolk County case, and for testifying under oath in August 2010 that she had an advanced degree from the University of Massachusetts, Attorney General Martha Coakley said at a news conference.

In one of the cases, Boston police had tested a substance as negative for cocaine, but when Dookhan tested it, she reported it as positive. Investigators later retested the cample and it came back negative, Verner said.

The only motive authorities have found so far is that Dookhan wanted to be seen as a good worker, Coakley said.

According to a state police report in August, Dookhan said she just wanted to get the work done and never meant to hurt anyone.

"I screwed up big-time," she is quoted as saying. "I messed up bad; it's my fault. I don't want the lab to get in trouble."

Dookhan's supervisors have faced harsh criticism for not removing her from lab duties after suspicions about her were first raised by her co-workers and for not alerting prosecutors and police. However, Coakley said, there is no indication so far of criminal activity by anyone else at the lab.

Co-workers began expressing concern about Dookhan's work habits several years ago, but her supervisors allowed her to continue working. Dookhan was the most productive chemist in the lab, routinely testing more than 500 samples a month, while others tested 50 to 150.

One co-worker told state police he never saw Dookhan in front of a microscope. A lab employee saw Dookhan weighing drug samples without doing a balance check on her scale.

In an interview with state police late last month, Dookhan acknowledged faking test results for two to three years. She told police she identified some drug samples as narcotics simply by looking at them instead of testing them, a process known as dry labbing. She also said she forged the initials of colleagues and deliberately turned a negative sample into a positive for narcotics a few times.

"I hope the system isn't treating the evidence against her the way she treated the evidence against several thousand defendants," said defense attorney John T. Martin, who has a client who was allowed to withdraw his guilty plea based on concerns over Dookhan's work.

Dookhan was suspended from lab duties after getting caught forging a colleague's initials on paperwork in June 2011. She resigned in March as the Department of Public Health investigated. The lab was run by the department until July 1, when state police took over as part of a state budget directive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My God.. What the fuck is wrong with people?

Although -- her mentality is more inline with the legal system anyways -- all potential suspects are guilty.

Why bother proving innocence when you can just screw with results, show everyone as guilty,. and show yourself as a conscientious worker?

Also, for such a sensitive job, why weren't her university qualifications verified during the employment / onboarding process?

Edited by SYNeR
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FUCK ME DEAD!!!

This is a huge story, it calls into question drug tests and the quality of testing worldwide!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the "system" encourages this behaviour on all fronts as syner has mentioned.

she's just a pawn trying to get ahead in this world.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just came across this article:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/06/annie-dookhan-drug-lab-scandal-500-released_n_1944804.html

I like how they've totally spun the story around..

The message I'm getting is "sure, she fucked up and incriminated people, but all these dangerous people will be back on the streets!1!11"

Which completely misses the point and is a piss poor excuse for her behaviour.

This story (and articles surrounding it) is completely mind boggling

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just came across this article:

http://www.huffingto..._n_1944804.html

I like how they've totally spun the story around..

The message I'm getting is "sure, she fucked up and incriminated people, but all these dangerous people will be back on the streets!1!11"

Which completely misses the point and is a piss poor excuse for her behaviour.

This story (and articles surrounding it) is completely mind boggling

 

Agree, it's totally mind-boggling. Little concern for the 300-500 people who are innocent until proven guilty with due process, but have nonetheless been incarcerated. If they're truly "dangerous people", that is, they have been proven to commit violent crimes, then they will still have a conviction for those crimes.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope some kind of class-action lawsuit is possible for these people. Only because it might deter this kind of testing in future. Maybe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t know why a story like this would surprise anyone. We’re talking about a country, which has the highest incarceration rates in the entire world. A country which brainwashes their citizens from birth into believing they are actually the freest & fairest country in the world.

I’m sure this kind of thing is much more common than people would think, due to the US guaranteed growth industry, of the prison industrial complex.

http://en.wikipedia....n_rate#See_also

Edited by jabez
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She ruined over 1000 people's lives because she was lazy, and she's only facing 20 years? Not surprising, but still horrific.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"I screwed up big-time," she is quoted as saying. "I messed up bad; it's my fault. I don't want the lab to get in trouble."

 

What about all falsely accussed defendants?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think the bitch(Scuse language) quite gets what she has done... How can it not have clicked in her head that turning a negative test into apositive will likely send someone to jail wrongfully. Good that now those wrongfully incarcerated can actually fight it, worrying that a large amount of people involved in organised crime gangs etc are undoubtedly also going to be able to get their charges revoked and get back out ont othe streets, because now they cant even re-test samples because she has contaminated many of them...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t know why a story like this would surprise anyone. We’re talking about a country, which has the highest incarceration rates in the entire world. A country which brainwashes their citizens from birth into believing they are actually the freest & fairest country in the world.

I’m sure this kind of thing is much more common than people would think, due to the US guaranteed growth industry, of the prison industrial complex.

http://en.wikipedia....n_rate#See_also

 

Exactly! Its not surprising that an individual would take short cuts in their work to try to get ahead in their career. She was reporting far more tests per day than was realistically possible compared to her co-workers. What is horrifying is that even when her behavior was clearly suspicious, no one in management stopped to think about the possible repercussions, and dismissed the concerns. I wouldnt be at all surprised if this kind of behavior is just the tip of the iceburg. Considering how embarrassing situations like this are for the US justice system, I'm a bit surprised this level of corruption was allowed to be made public.

Edited by Mr. Bowser

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×