bit Posted December 7, 2006 Hrm.. I could have sworn this was pach.. but on closer inspection it doesn't seem to have any spines at all.. which leads me to think it could be scop? Sorry about the pic quality. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 _e_ Posted December 7, 2006 hmm, thats possibly some of the biggest photos ive EVER seen on these forums.. i thought T said he had some pictue size optimising function enabled? By my eyes it looks like the spines have been removed??? doesnt look typical scopish to me, more cordobensis or something like that. Beautiful big and healthy specimen i must say! very very awesome score bit, your quite the monster long hauler arent you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 AndyAmine. Posted December 7, 2006 looks like a scop to me mate... was it bitter at all? I usualy give my cutting the lick test when they have some exposed flesh. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 bit Posted December 7, 2006 hmm, thats possibly some of the biggest photos ive EVER seen on these forums.. i thought T said he had some pictue size optimising function enabled?By my eyes it looks like the spines have been removed??? doesnt look typical scopish to me, more cordobensis or something like that. Beautiful big and healthy specimen i must say! very very awesome score bit, your quite the monster long hauler arent you. Biggest photos? 800x600 @ 78kb? Spines have not been removed, I helped the seller cut this off the parent plant, which is huge! Doesn't really look scopish to me either, but the lack of spines made me wonder.. Yep, me the monster cacti hunter :D There's another cutting this size up for sale that I hope to procure also :D Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 _e_ Posted December 7, 2006 dont get me wrong, i love big photos, i use broadband so no dramas... i just thought it wasnt actually possible to post pics that big for some reason... or maybe its the old computer and crappy browser that makes them seem so big. I def dont think its a scop, but the spinelessness points towards the possibility of somekind of hybrid. Seed would be very very much appreciated over here if you could ever wrangle such things. i bet that arm weighed quite a lot! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 bit Posted December 7, 2006 (edited) dont get me wrong, i love big photos, i use broadband so no dramas... i just thought it wasnt actually possible to post pics that big for some reason... or maybe its the old computer and crappy browser that makes them seem so big.I def dont think its a scop, but the spinelessness points towards the possibility of somekind of hybrid. Seed would be very very much appreciated over here if you could ever wrangle such things. i bet that arm weighed quite a lot! Coolness Yeah it is quite heavy.. I'm trying to devise a method of supporting it when I plant it.. A couple of other kiwis have id's this as Juuls, although it's different to this one also id'd as Juuls: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v441/evo...MG_8898copy.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v441/evo...ts/IMG_6269.jpg Edited December 7, 2006 by bit Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 apothecary Posted December 7, 2006 Nice find. No idea what it is, but I definitely think it's not a scop. Although as mentioned, spinelessness is possibly an indication of hybrid, maybe the mummy or daddy was a scop? Also, as this is clearly a mature specimen, you should only really compare it to photos of other mature specimens for identification purpose (at least, imo). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 AndyAmine. Posted December 8, 2006 I ID'd it as scop because I got a piece from Darcy named as such a while back that looked the same. Wasnt Jono's big scop find spineless? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 M S Smith Posted December 8, 2006 I wouldn't say a scop, and those really small areoles are common on most Juul's. I might also add that some better focused and lit shots would be appreciated, especially of the growing tip....oh, and a clipping sent me way. How about spines, are there any longer ones on the lower portions of the stalk? ~Michael~ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 bit Posted December 8, 2006 (edited) I wouldn't say a scop, and those really small areoles are common on most Juul's. I might also add that some better focused and lit shots would be appreciated, especially of the growing tip....oh, and a clipping sent me way. How about spines, are there any longer ones on the lower portions of the stalk? ~Michael~ Here's a couple more pics, one of the tip and one of the spines lower down the plant. Pity I didn't have my camera to take pix of the mother plant :/ If you're serious about a clipping send me a pm - the seller had more of the same, for a very reasonable price ($50NZ for this cutting) Edited December 8, 2006 by bit Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 Conan Troutman Posted December 9, 2006 defiently reminds me of eileen in spineshifting mode.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 Torsten Posted December 9, 2006 there is no limit to the size of pics that can be sourced from elsewhere [as these are]. the images that are uploaded to the server are a different story. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 AndyAmine. Posted December 9, 2006 Hmm, by the looks of the tip it doesnt look like a straight scop does it? Any chance of getting a reply on the lick test? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 bit Posted December 9, 2006 Hmm, by the looks of the tip it doesnt look like a straight scop does it? Any chance of getting a reply on the lick test? Heh, sorry forgot to reply to that. The vendor cut and applied sulphur as I watched, so I didn't get a chance to lick the flesh. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hrm.. I could have sworn this was pach.. but on closer inspection it doesn't seem to have any spines at all.. which leads me to think it could be scop? Sorry about the pic quality.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites