Jump to content
The Corroboree
  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
chilli

Can I get some I.D. help please?

Question

Can anyone please give me their ideas on what this hoary old fellow might be?

post-1250-1186975096_thumb.jpg

post-1250-1186975115_thumb.jpg

post-1250-1186975186_thumb.jpg

post-1250-1186975176_thumb.jpg

post-1250-1186975196_thumb.jpg

Cheers.

post-1250-1186975096_thumb.jpg

post-1250-1186975115_thumb.jpg

post-1250-1186975176_thumb.jpg

post-1250-1186975186_thumb.jpg

post-1250-1186975196_thumb.jpg

post-1250-1186975096_thumb.jpg

post-1250-1186975115_thumb.jpg

post-1250-1186975176_thumb.jpg

post-1250-1186975186_thumb.jpg

post-1250-1186975196_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

has a resemblance to macrogonus... but maybe something different which I have not seen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Hi IllegalBrain, thats an interesting plant! It looks like Trichocereus Cuzcoensis! bye Eg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

yes, it looks very similar to some of my plants that I'm guessing are KK242/T.Cuzcoensis in some ways, different in others... definitely not anything like the Macros I have, but XipeTotec sometimes sees Macros behind every bush :)

Tough one that...first guess was T.Cuzcoensis dont think its a marco

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

That's what was commonly known in the past as the "T. peruvianus KK242". The introduction under this name isn't really known, but I suspect it came from mislabeled Knize seed as KK242 indicates a plant from Matucana, Peru, and there is no indication this form of Trichocereus grows in Matucana. The KK242 name in the last few years has become associated with a plant apparently from Matucana and the surrounding areas which I would probably simply consider a form of T. pachanoi, similar to those found in Ecuador and northern Peru.

I'm apparently the first who shed some light on this plant possibly being T. cuzcoensis and I've refered to the plant in the photos as "T. peruvianus KK242 (T. cuzcoensis?)". This keeps the original name, but adds a possible, though not confirmed, idenitification. There does apparenlty appear to be "complex" of these "T. cuzcoensis" forms just as there is in T. peruvianus.

~Michael~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×