ahura999

Still on bail in victoria and have been signing in daily on bail for over 2 years now ... charges 10 x import border controlled drug (methylone) 1 x trafficking of (LSD) 1 x attempt possess border controlled drug(methylone) 1 x possess border controlled drug(methylone)

still on bail signing i now daily for 2 years + ...

i cant find any court references, docs etc if anyone can help that would be great .

PRISM was founded in Australia as an incorporated non-profit research association in March 2011 and is a government approved tax-exempt charity. Our purpose is to investigate whether psychedelic compounds, while being powerful psychoactive agents that should be approached with enormous respect, are also potential medicines that may be employed to achieve significant positive outcomes in the treatment of a range of diseases for which conventional medicines provide limited relief. The word ‘psychedelic’ was explicitly included in the name of our organisation in the hope of encouraging more widespread familiarity, removing the mystery of the unknown, addressing the social stigma still attached to psychedelics and ultimately according them value and respect. PRISM is closely aligned with our USA based collaborative partner, the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS). www.prism.org.au/

be very aware of the of Mens Rea, mental or fault elements definitions under the code ... 5.1 Fault elements (1) A fault element for a particular physical element may be intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence. (2) Subsection (1) does not prevent a law that creates a particular offence from specifying other fault elements for a physical element of that offence. 5.2 Intention (1) A person has intention with respect to conduct if he or she means to engage in that conduct. (2) A person has intention with respect to a circumstance if he or she believes that it exists or will exist. (3) A person has intention with respect to a result if he or she means to bring it about or is aware that it will occur in the ordinary course of events. 5.3 Knowledge A person has knowledge of a circumstance or a result if he or she is aware that it exists or will exist in the ordinary course of events. 5.4 Recklessness (1) A person is reckless with respect to a circumstance if: (a) he or she is aware of a substantial risk that the circumstance exists or will exist; and (having regard to the circumstances known to him or her, it is unjustifiable to take the risk. (2) A person is reckless with respect to a result if: (a) he or she is aware of a substantial risk that the result will occur; and ( having regard to the circumstances known to him or her, it is unjustifiable to take the risk. (3) The question whether taking a risk is unjustifiable is one of fact. (4) If recklessness is a fault element for a physical element of an offence, proof of intention, knowledge or recklessness will satisfy that fault element. 5.5 Negligence A person is negligent with respect to a physical element of an offence if his or her conduct involves: (a) such a great falling short of the standard of care that a reasonable person would exercise in the circumstances; and ( such a high risk that the physical element exists or will exist; that the conduct merits criminal punishment for the offence. 5.6 Offences that do not specify fault elements (1) If the law creating the offence does not specify a fault element for a physical element that consists only of conduct, intention is the fault element for that physical element. (2) If the law creating the offence does not specify a fault element for a physical element that consists of a circumstance or a result, recklessness is the fault element for that physical element. Note: Under subsection 5.4(4), recklessness can be established by proving intention, knowledge or recklessness.

analogue laws are not complex at all ... if it has a pharmacalogical effect "similar" to, or chemical structure "substantially similar" to,( the FEDS say what is and what isnt) , and, unless you are a rare bird, and can get a chemist to be expert witness and PROOVE otherwise - shulgin has appeared in australia ) and...your unlucky enough to be brought to the attention of the authorities, one will be more often than not charged and prosecuted under 314.4 criminal code act 1995 (www.erowid.org/psychoactives/law/countries/.../australia_law1.pdf) ...from then on you, your friends and your family are fucked...the rest is history this i know all to well... and be very careful of Mens Rea, mental or fault elements definitions under the code ... 5.1 Fault elements (1) A fault element for a particular physical element may be intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence. (2) Subsection (1) does not prevent a law that creates a particular offence from specifying other fault elements for a physical element of that offence. 5.2 Intention (1) A person has intention with respect to conduct if he or she means to engage in that conduct. (2) A person has intention with respect to a circumstance if he or she believes that it exists or will exist. (3) A person has intention with respect to a result if he or she means to bring it about or is aware that it will occur in the ordinary course of events. 5.3 Knowledge A person has knowledge of a circumstance or a result if he or she is aware that it exists or will exist in the ordinary course of events. 5.4 Recklessness (1) A person is reckless with respect to a circumstance if: (a) he or she is aware of a substantial risk that the circumstance exists or will exist; and ( having regard to the circumstances known to him or her, it is unjustifiable to take the risk. (2) A person is reckless with respect to a result if: (a) he or she is aware of a substantial risk that the result will occur; and ( having regard to the circumstances known to him or her, it is unjustifiable to take the risk. (3) The question whether taking a risk is unjustifiable is one of fact. (4) If recklessness is a fault element for a physical element of an offence, proof of intention, knowledge or recklessness will satisfy that fault element. 5.5 Negligence A person is negligent with respect to a physical element of an offence if his or her conduct involves: (a) such a great falling short of the standard of care that a reasonable person would exercise in the circumstances; and ( such a high risk that the physical element exists or will exist; that the conduct merits criminal punishment for the offence. 5.6 Offences that do not specify fault elements (1) If the law creating the offence does not specify a fault element for a physical element that consists only of conduct, intention is the fault element for that physical element. (2) If the law creating the offence does not specify a fault element for a physical element that consists of a circumstance or a result, recklessness is the fault element for that physical element. Note: Under subsection 5.4(4), recklessness can be established by proving intention, knowledge or recklessness.

hi, trying to find info on court case at which Sasha Shulgin was expert witness . where is R.Simpson now ? anyone have info/advice where to find caselaw, notes or how to contact R.Simpson ?

ha fukin ha

thanks. have been in contact with torsten

probably with mine in the custody of the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA ...

dont even try it ...you will regret it

ahhhhhhhhhhh all too familiar . DAmned if you do and damned if ya dont . 458 days signing in for bail and counting ...35 yr max sentence import border controlled 307.3.1 .......

Hi , i need legal representation urgently in relation to arrest for import border controlled 307.3.1 criminal code . Analogue of ....... anyone have any solid contacts .... help...

RIP OWSLEY

Psychedelic icon killed in Qld car crash ABC March 14, 2011, 9:56 am Stanley "Bear" Owsley , a 1960s counterculture figure who flooded the flower power scene with LSD and was an early benefactor of the Grateful Dead, reportedly died in a car crash in far north Queensland at the weekend. Former Rolling Stones and Grateful Dead tour manager Sam Cutler, who now lives in Brisbane, released a statement on behalf of Stanley's family saying the crash occurred near Stanley's home. Stanley was believed to be 76. The renegade grandson of a former governor of Kentucky, Stanley helped lay the foundation for the psychedelic era by producing more than a million doses of LSD at his labs in San Francisco's Bay Area. "He made acid so pure and wonderful that people like Jimi Hendrix wrote hit songs about it and others named their band in its honour," Cutler wrote in his 2008 memoirs You Can't Always Get What You Want. Hendrix's song Purple Haze was reputedly inspired by a batch of Stanley's product, though the guitarist denied any drug link. The ear-splitting blues-psychedelic combo Blue Cheer took its name from another batch. Stanley briefly managed the Grateful Dead and oversaw every aspect of their live sound at a time when little thought was given to amplification in public venues. His tape recordings of Dead concerts were turned into live albums. According to a 2007 profile in the San Francisco Chronicle, Stanley started cooking LSD after discovering the recipe in a chemistry journal at the University of California, Berkeley. The police raided his first lab in 1966, but Stanley successfully sued for the return of his equipment. After a marijuana bust in 1970 he went to prison for two years. "I wound up doing time for something I should have been rewarded for," he told the Chronicle's Joel Selvin. "What I did was a community service, the way I look at it. I was punished for political reasons. Absolutely meaningless. Was I a criminal? No. I was a good member of society. Only my society and the one making the laws are different." He emigrated to Queensland in the early 1980s, apparently fearful of a new ice age, and sold enamel sculptures online. He lost one of his vocal cords to cancer. Stanley is survived by his wife Sheila, four children, eight grandchildren and two great-grandchildren. - *Reuters*