ref1ect1ons

Your logic is mind-blowing. The man is an oncologist, it is funny how condescending you are, do you really believe an oncologist would choose to believew that because cancer is white and because candida is white, therefore it must be candida. Why didnt he choose flour or some other substance. Valid science, hmmm, how did you determine that with NO investigation. Yes emotion have been greatly implicated in the regulation of dna. http://www.soulsofdistortion.nl/SODA_chapter9.html Negative emotions are bad for dna. Wow I wasnt so arrogant in my assuptions towards this info, seems we have alot of oncologist here. Dr Simoncini, http://www.curenaturalicancro.com/2-cause-cancer.html Genetics, the battle horse of modern oncology, is about to give up the ghost, together with its endless explanations based on enzymatic and receptor processes. Actually, it has already failed – it is just that no one can think of anything else that can take its place. The consequence of the oncological establishment’s inability to admit the failure of this line of research, which is at this point scientifically indefensible, is the continuous waste of a great quantity of economic, scientific and human resources. There are also chemicals in many vegetables that also prevent cancer, many ppl have heard the apricot seed myth.

Great work Nabraxas, I am really glad both explanations have been credited here. I am actually a believer myself, in that I dont say aliens or men, I say I believe in the mystery; an explanation that acknowledges the high technology that is sometimes evident in crop circles without saying who, cause I have yet to figure this out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgP9aiIUBU0 I must add that I thought part 2 and 3 were excellent, even if, as I have agreed, the beginning is a little shaky. Nuclear explosion. Heard a nice poem today, Ill share it here. "I am the Power and Flower of the Field." By 'field' they mean the Akashic Field.

2 hours.

.

That and GMO's are the greatest prob.

That was awesome, simply how he says "i dont feel homeless, Im just camping", and seems to have a rather peaceful and healthy existence. Sad so many Americans are doing this, but hey if you gotta do it, do it with others. Little tented community, everyone gathering round fires, sharing and shz. Ahhh, wouldnt it be nice. Lets all quit our jobs and start a tent community outside Nimbin. It would be awesome, bonfires everynight, bush tucker, rice, cooking together. Impending financial doom, or impending awesome outdoor party, you be the judge. Seriously I will probably end up in some sort of hippie cult where I end up farming or something.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1MuT_KSOo4 This is how I think it would actually go down, lmao.

Using organic farming to free yourself from the system more. It's in english.

Growers need to do the right thing, if their greed cost us this freedom it will be a fitting lesson for us all. Do they understand that it is not ALL ABOUT THEM AND THEIR FUKIN PROFIT, it is about medicine being free and fair. This is why we 'get what we deserve', and I have to suffer as I am lumped with the masses and their bondage.

Well it's 34 days now. I feel that this change will affect the whole world and eventually save my gnome alot of money. It is funny that the "no to prop 19" has only recieved a single civilian donator. While the "yes campaign' takes alot more money from the public, seems the public has already spoken and only the corporate interest (as usual) stand in our way. It is also funy that these corporations are made up of many of the workers who support prop 19. Meaning they support their 'slavery/freedom limitation' in an indirect way. URL: http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/38942-alcohol-lobby-now-openly-spending-against-californias-legal-pot-initiative-in-alliance-with-police-industrial-complex Alcohol Lobby Now Openly Spending Against California's Legal Pot Initiative in Alliance with Police Industrial Complex

Now they have established themselves as the official 'leaders' of the world. These are not our true leaders, they shlould not meet with alien populations. We want to 'Put you best foot forward', I nominate a native American chief or an Australian Aboriginal Leader or a Great Scientist, philosopher or Artist Pehaps a Brazillian Shaman or a Buddhist/spiritual Leader. The dalai Lama, Alex Grey, Echart Tolle, or some cool scientist that I respect. Any of these would be better than some halfwit beaurocrat (sp?). Edit: We may have been duped: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/09/27/appoints-contact-visiting-space-aliens/ Article is called; U.N. Denies Appointing 'First Contact' for Visiting Space Aliens

5HTP made me feel extremly strange, I felt kind of in a cloud, no pain, no stress, no motivation, my thoughts seemed to melt away and a peace and energy filled me (i only took it a couple times because I started to feel 'high' all the time and had to stop). Strange how diff chems affect ppl differently. I still have some of it in my fridge, it also changed my sleep and eating habits. i felt more tired and more hungry when tired and when hungry.

Amazing, sounds like some sort of group conciousness or 100 monkey effect. Dworx you have helped me a tonne, i couldnt find this info anywhere, and yeah really beautiful colours. Thanks. I think you can eat some young shoots as well, so yeah you can makes heaps of shiz from it and eat it, But don t smoke it. I would think. Heh, I searched this and found a vid of some idiot smoking bamboo. Seems it is almost/equally as useful as weed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnUis501bz0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJiCU6Jw0Co&feature=player_embedded#! 2 hrs here folks, it was aight

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMaMBy0EzcA

Ok, I see the way your mind works, and I see that you are looking for something different. I was demanding the spirit of a debate because it is a game, it is entertainment, it is untruth. I now see that you are searching for a real answer, very noble. I look for the Truth in other ways, wow this has taught me something. I sincerly wish you well on your way to Truth. Your Way is valid but different. I will tip my hat to you and be on my Way.

I love eckhart, started reading him as a teen. "There are still many people who believe that the problems of this world can be solved if we just think, think harder about them. Have more commitee meetings..., and eventually they can be solved. They dont realise that the problems of this world are there because we have lost touch with the source..., further differentiation (thinking) cannot help, it can only create more problems" I can understand how others may see it as a cult, for example some people feel that to stop thinking would leave them vulnerable to any external influence, that they would lose their sense of self. However I have found the opposite to be true, when there is a space or you put your attention on some stillness, a space opens, your mind ceases and you feel more alive and more your self. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/8025142/Bill-Bryson-Have-faith-science-can-solve-our-problems.html Also here is an article about how scientist can solve and understand every thing.

I think it is easier to control these kinds of people with professional/intellectual 'mechanisms'. Because porfessors who come-up with a new idea or even challenge the status quo take a risk, I feel that scientist are keeping their heads down and are afraid to speak-out. The greatest fear an intellectual has is being thought of as stupid, they absolutely resent it, as a large part of their identity, quite understandably, comes from their knowledge and intellect. They are valued for thier knowledge and intellect. So if a scientist speaks out, the media can make them seem 'crazy' or a 'mad scientist', a kook i think is the word. Scientist are afraid of being thought of as kooks in the eyes of the general public, as this is where their self-worth derives. It is certain that there are going to be some dangers with GMO and that these have not been discussed; this is why I think there is some sort of manipulation going on, either through money or other means. The other possibilty, which seems rather implausible to me, is that GMOs are completely safe and scientist arent speaking out as much as they should (nice info, thanks rm) because they are infact safe. Which I dont think is true. But you know, others may choose to believe this, my condolences.

Yes those plants are irresistable. Such vibrant specimens, I can almost taste their potency. Welcome, maybe in time you will allow your unique strain to spread slowly throughout. I wanted to ask as well, but I knew the answer, maybe some of us can get together and bring another strong strain to Aus. I am really interested in the prospect of a strong and slightly psychidelic kava, I hate alcohol so this is appealing. I always liked kava, but find most stuff to be kinda weak. I am going to start searching to this end, I will be checking ebay in hawaii etc, I hope to find a strong strain, is there a way to go about finding a strong strain Casaurius?, any stand out cultivator names where i could start? once again welcome.

I originally assumed it was shopped until I found these.

Seems you can't order young baboo sapling anywhere in aus, they also appear to be very expensive and pick-up only. Anyone know a good site besides bambooland? I am after a nice blue specoes of bamboo, a young plant from a mail site or a nursery in se qld/ ne Nsw. Any advice asppreciated, as I havent come across this before, bamboo seems unusually hard to get a hand on. Also even a species name for this blue bamboo ius elusive. I think weeping himalayan has a blue tinge, not like this though.

Wow you have managed to call me a kook and a fanatic (in an indirect way), obviously this is just an artifact of your reasoning style, which is to attack the person's subjective traits, and avoid addressing anything they have to say directly. I understand you are sememingly (not objectively) arrogant, as you to refuse to enter a debate, "because I don't argue with fanatics"; so you don't argue with those who hold 'inferior' beliefs, or beliefs that are threatening to your own beliefs. I have evaluated your journal article fairly and integrated it into my value systrem, it has value. But to suggest that everything I offer has no value, now that's fukin stupid. You didnt even consider the information in the first place so how can you call it 'worthless' and dismiss it as 'conspiracy'. It only apppears to be conspiracy, you have been taught to spot 'conpriacy' or threatening information very efficiently, also called brain washing, as the typical reaction is to reject threatening info. You have misjudged me as a kook, because although you have learnt to identify 'kook's in school, they forgot to teach you to criticise your subjective feelings. If you had done so you would see that I am not a kook, that I am a reasonable and loving man, equal in intelligence and power to you, and am truly worthy to answer you and counter your points. Svarg may have called you a vegetable, but he didnt call me a kook. You have called me, and I will answer.

Argue the fukin point directly. This backhanded ad hominen reference nonsense is BS. Argue each point on it's merit, elaborate the points of the journal article that make your case. Drop the petty BS, or save it for me. So the point of the argument from my perspective was that of a difference between man-made and naturally occuring flouride. Now rahli did not state what source he considered the black tea from, I assume natural (is it an added component?), so I assume the ref rahli provided makes the point that naturally occuring floride is also harmful. I have NOT read the article and do not care to. I am interested in elaborating this part of the article to draw out this point. I am also aware that rahli did not seem, from here, to enter into a debate with svarg about this. Infact you seemed to avoid it by calling attention to svarg's 'refs', while not addressing his point directly. Svarg has said that there is a diff between natural and man-made floride, svarg has said that apatite, is actually very different from the stuff that is added to our water. It contradicts rahli's journal article, as it would suggest that the black tea source SHOULD NOT have produced the effect it did in an experimental design. So basically svarg has to suggest that there is a third or other naturally occuring source that does not produce these toxic effects (simple, our teeth, apatite). And rahli has to explicitly state his point. Specifically whether he believes all flouride to be toxic or not. Or state what he believed the argument to be about. Also is apatite the same as the flouride of black tea? (both natural sources), i think that these would be different again. Although the source may be questionable (i think most uni professors and mainstream scientist are rather questionable also) it has still been reported in a number of places, so perhaps leads back to a good source. On any note the information seems logically sound as it does seem plausible that chemicals produced in a factory would vary, and be potentially more toxic, then their natural counterparts. I have no understanding of chemistry, which is why I didnt sink deeper. I know I dont have the knowledge here. But some of you do and can educate me through your honest and sincere observations. This is all i ask, as i have done.