I'm so confused why this clone is considered to be a pachanoi.
It has long spines, V notches and large areols. All these characteristics describe a peruvianus. However, it's rich green with no glaucinous (at least in my environment).
So why is it seen as a long-spined pachanoi? Is it the length of its flower tubes?
I'm so confused why this clone is considered to be a pachanoi.
It has long spines, V notches and large areols. All these characteristics describe a peruvianus. However, it's rich green with no glaucinous (at least in my environment).
So why is it seen as a long-spined pachanoi? Is it the length of its flower tubes?
Enlighten me please.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites