Jump to content
The Corroboree
  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
prier

TreEchOseeiRuosz IDzz?!?

Question

I don't know what these things are. I am stumped aye.

This one

post-1178-0-41697900-1397477831_thumb.jp

and this one

post-1178-0-21445300-1397477838_thumb.jp

and this fuckin' one

post-1178-0-67692000-1397477844_thumb.jp

and fuckin' this cunt 'ere

post-1178-0-92501900-1397477851_thumb.jp

post-1178-0-41697900-1397477831_thumb.jpg

post-1178-0-21445300-1397477838_thumb.jpg

post-1178-0-67692000-1397477844_thumb.jpg

post-1178-0-92501900-1397477851_thumb.jpg

post-1178-0-41697900-1397477831_thumb.jpg

post-1178-0-21445300-1397477838_thumb.jpg

post-1178-0-67692000-1397477844_thumb.jpg

post-1178-0-92501900-1397477851_thumb.jpg

Edited by prier

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

That's easy, just check the file names .... ;). The last one.... I don't know.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I'll say

nice bridgesii

hybrid with peru and bridge in the mix

cuzco

no idea

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

The further collections get crossed and seedlings spread the more and more difficult an ID will get and we'll just call it whatever "pure" species it most looks like, this even though seed from the same pod when grown out can look like either parent or even the parents parent if a hybrid of a hybrid. :blink:

With that in mind, the first looks most like T. bridgesii, the second like some T. pachanoi or some T. peruvianus (or any intermediary), the third I'd just call T. cuzcoensis, and the last looks like some sort of strange T. tacaquirensis/taquimbalensis/werderamnnianus.

I'm most fond of the plant in the second photo.

~Michael~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I have a rough idea of what they might be. the files names are rough guesses ;) curious if anyone has clone names for the first three and the last i really have no idea, haven't seen it flower yet.

Edited by prier

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Think the first Two are bridgesii. Or at least involve bridgesii. Third cuzcoensis and the fourth looks similar to what shruman called terscheckiinot! A peruvianus! Could be from the wide variety of cuzcoensis type plants. But of course not in the sense of kk242. There are many cuzcoensis varieties and i think that the original describer saw a spiny peru like that when he described Macrogonus!

Edited by Evil Genius

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×