Torsten Posted April 12, 2002 http://www.shaman-australis.com/Website/Daturas.htm let me know if you find any mistakes. I wrote the Brugmansia section myself from a flow chart and I haven't had a chance to double check them all. The daturas should be good though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
t st tantra Posted April 16, 2002 what i have as d wrightii is a mixture of 7 and 7'.5 hook like teeth, wavy edges, no other colour on flower and yellowish seeds. t s t . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pablo Posted April 24, 2002 Dutra doesnt mean anything Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Torsten Posted April 24, 2002 One of the ways of classifying the daturas is to divde them into just three groups (sections I think). Dutra is one of these and includes the meteloides, metel, inoxia, etc species. I think this is all the pods that split unevenly. Another is ceratocaulis, which only includes ceratocaula. And the third is section stramonium, ferox etc. I think all those where the pods splits evenly into compartments. I think this section classification gives a good indication just how closely some of the species are related. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alcaline Posted April 24, 2002 There is'nt any question that points toward 5 (datura metel)! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Torsten Posted April 25, 2002 Originally posted by Alcaline: There is'nt any question that points toward 5 (datura metel)! Hmmm, I will check this out. I didn't write this key, so I am not sure why it was left out, but yes, it should probably be there. I will rewrite it. I am glad someone is actually using this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites