jondoe

(However I have to concede that you can suggest it, (as you did) even though the content of your suggestion is (as you certainly know) totally and utterly wrong.) Tell me, why would I be wrong ? Your Englsh skills are not the best are they ? No the costs are not that great, a couple of grand would do the job. If they dont have their own monney they have to borrow. Why would you mention China or are you aware that they have been there on a couple of occasions ? They are not about making the rich cunts richer, they are about selling their system to make themselves and their shareholders ritcher. Us poor stupid cunts will never worry while we have plenty of piss, drugs and TV.

I can suggest that this remark is incorrect, But alas, I now thing it is an elaborate hoax I keep in touch with Lu Britts weekly and it is no hoax, the only hoax are the people who are wanting the use his system but they dont have enough of their own money to pay for it. The new prototype is producing six to one at a 100rpm.

The extract from the site I provided identified two names of the persons involved. One is an ex-federal police officer from the NT and he lives in Irvinbank on the Atherton Tablelands and he is not game to take another matter with the Brigalow arguement in to any Qld pretend court as they have warned him that he will pay for all of the costs in any further attempts to argue this rubbish. David will not even concede that he has not yet been into a statutory court constituted in accordence with the public policy created by the defacto government. we don't have feee simple rights to our land anymore? You have never had the above because it is collateral for the State Corporation's debts but you do have fee simple rights to the use of the land you think you have purchased. You have only purchased the rights to the use of the the land, you have not purchased the land regardless of the alleged title printed on A4 paper. Are you enrolled to vote at the elections for the three levels of defacto government. Do you vote at the State Elections ? Do you vote at the Local Government elections ? Do you vote at the Federal Elections ?

Contacts If you have any problems you may contact me at the below mentioned telephone number or David Walter on 07) 4096 3009 or [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> or Sue Maynes on 02) 6345 1254 or email [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. http://www.saveoz.info/index.php?title=Land_ownership_removed_from_the_people_of_Queensland Contacts If you have any problems you may contact me at the below mentioned telephone number or David Walter on 07) 4096 3009 or [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> or Sue Maynes on 02) 6345 1254 or email [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. They have been driving this garbage for years and wonder why they were tossed out of every pretend court they have taken this rubbish to. If we are a corporation what part do you play willingly ?

I know exactly where you got this rubbish from and who created it. You have got the wrong corporation, its the State of Queensland Australia and the Queensland Treasury Corp. Go to the links and read all of the documents listed on the site. http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1244818/000119312509132811/0001193125-09-132811-index.htm http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1244818/000119312503079928/0001193125-03-079928-index.htm

I can only suggest that if he absorbs all of the bits of information provided on this topic he will end up in jail. I will suggest that he goes into the so called court and he does not leave the public gallery when called to the bar to speak to the alleged magistrate. Then demand that the magistrate provide a copy of his Commission, his instrument of appointment, issued by the Governor as this has now been done in Queensland on four occasions in Bris, Prosapine, Rockhampton and Cairns on several occasions in one particular matter where the defendant is being prosecuted by R the complainant ( who the fuck is that) and that is what is displayed on the alleged evidence brief provided by the Police. The Magistrates cant provide a copy of their Comission because it DOES NOT EXIST its one big scamm and they know we know. Others have also demanded these documents from their local Members of the Parliament but none have provided anything. The Office of Sue Boyce, a Senator from Qld has also requested copies of these official documents from their State brothers and six months later nothing has been provided and no reasons given. If the grub on the Bench is not a properly commissioned judicial officer with an instrument of appointment signed and sealed, he cant deal with any complaint from the Police without your express consent but they trick you into giving your implied consent. If you enter into the boundries of the court and leave the public gallery, and move into his personal court, you have provided your implied consent to the individual, pretend magistrate, hearing the complaint from the Police. We are not yet a Republic, but if you allow them to deny you your rights as a sovereign individual they will take your money or jail you so that the Corporation running the Prison ends up with your BOND and they make money on it while you are in their care. Dont give the grub on the bench jurisdiction, he does not have it without your express consent. In Queensland this has been the only thing that upsets the Bench, he wont go any further with the matter if you stand your ground. Also take a tape-recorder and record every word but dont do it openly they simply dont want you getting evidence of their criminal offences. Neutralise the Magistrate and the Police have nowhere to go

Below is the last paragraph of a speech given by Kevin Rudd in Sth Aust some weeks ago and found at the web address. http://www.pm.gov.au/node/5219 That if we’re serious about this principle, that we’ll make a difference here in this community by being in this together. For the challenge, ladies and gentlemen, lies with you. Work with us. Work through your local members. Work through the local priority employment coordinator. There is no monopoly of wisdom on our part in terms of what’s going to work in this community. I know enough about local community life from where I come from the People’s Republic of Queensland, that everywhere is different, okay. Everywhere is different. And everyone’s got their own best ideas about how things should be done and you’ve got your own best knowledge and your own best networks.

My medication, or I should say my diet, has not made me cranky and I dont know how you have come to that conclusion but its your right to have that opinion. As for your statement half our problem is we spend so much time getting on eachother's nerves Its very obvious that I have got on somebodies nerves, the people on this site dont get on my nerves at all so I dont understand why you make that statement as its infers that the people on this site get on my nerves, if they did I would not bother posting any comments on this site. As for the information I provide on this site, I dont see anybody suggesting its incorrect and prooving I am wrong, the problem is they simply dont understand the facts of how our LEGAL SYSTEM has been hijacked by a particular section of the community and the elite members of the legal profession who have absolute control over the other pretenders. When you realise what is happening behind the scenes, or what has NOT taken place in relation to the creation of so called laws or public policy, you may have half a chance of being successful with your pursuits in relation to the medical use of your favourite plant or other substances. lightning I see no gain being made by denying the jurisdiction of the courts or challenging the integrity of the court to their face. If you honestly think that there is some integrity in the court and that it has jurisdiction to exercise judicial power over your rights, what do you base this belief on ? If the so called laws are not created in accordence with the State and Commonwealth Constitution and these laws create the courts and the judicial appointments, dont you think it would be prudent to actually check that all the procedures have been done correctly in compliance with the Constitutions. The facts are that this has not happened, and it has been done this way specifically so the jurisdiction is provided by the parties before the court and not the law or authority of the grub wearing the black or red robes in the court room. The courts can only exist or be constituted in accordence with the laws created by the Parliament that you all take part in electing and the one very important procedure is the Royal Assent issued by the Governor or Governor-General for and on behalf of the Sovereign. We are not yet a Republic are we, we are alleged to be a Constitutional Monachy with a westminister system of government. If this Royal Assent has not been issued, properly signed and sealed, it has not happened at all, so we dont have laws with force, only terms and condition of public policy set out in the Bill passed by the Legislative Assembly in Qld. Qld does not have an upper house. In the Commonwealth it has to be passed by both the Legislative Assembly and the Senate.

NO reptyle Also...I'm going to court on Monday for possession of a Prohibited substance, namely three grams of DMT... I am pleading not guilty If you were in posssession of the DMT why are you in denial ? Why enter a plea at all ? All you have done is give him jurisdiction to hear the complaint being made by the Police. Is the grub in the blackdress up on the bench authorised to be there ? The following is an extract from the Queensland Constitution and it would appear that the Magistrate also has to have his piece of paper, "Instrument of Appointment", just like you with your drivers licence. This question was asked of a Magistrate in Brisbane yesterday and the reply was yes, I have one but I dont have it with me and he refused to produce it. Does he have an " Instrument of Appointment" issued by the Governor of Queensland displaying on its face the Public Seal of the State and the Governor's signature, I will bet he has a bit of paper with some mark on it that you could assume is a signature but it wont disoplay the Public Seal of the State. Page 39 of the Annotated Queensland Constitution. A seal is a device that leaves an impression on paper and provides a mark of authenticity on certain official instruments. The “Public Seal of the State” is the seal that demonstrates the Sovereign’s authority in Queensland. Examples of documents that the Governor seals with the Public Seal of the State include commissions appointing members of the judiciary, Deputy Governors, Ministers and Executive Councillors, as well as various types of proclamations.

I did not provide a sugar coated opinion either way and I dont beleive that I could honestly say that I am againt the ethnobotanicalists as I rely on a form of medication for pain releif in the same way, but I try and use substances that dont effect my thought processes and wipe me out for hours or days. If any person wishes to use MJ for medicial purposes or pain relief that is entirely up to them but public policy dictates otherwise and they know that. I have not made my mind up about any opinion posted on this site, cant see why you did, I just provided opinion and supportered the opinion with evidence to support my comments, it got removed to another thread by the local forum Policeman so I guess that he has made up his mind as well. I am suggesting that this matter will never be dealt with in any bulshit statutory court, they are not courts exercising judicial power without your consent, they are legal proceedings, conducted by member of the legal professiion and the self litigants, surreptitiously created with the implied consent of both parties under their statutory rules and they are dealing with public policy made by the very people who you willingly elect to sit in the Parliament and create this soft law for and on your behalf. Nothing to do with the Queen or the Sovereign whoever that my be. If you beleive that any other person has the authority to exercise power and affect your substantive rights and you consent or apply to go into their legal system you will be bound by the results of the fraudlent process that you have willingly entered into. It is a commercial system as you enter into a contract with the court (tribunal) to deal with the matter in dispute, you pay them a fee to conduct the business of the court. I suspect that it would have been a thousand dollar fee plus, to have the High Tribunal Office close the doors on the application for leave. I have seen many many applications go the same way and this scamm will continue for many years to come.

Well, how can I respond to this little gem, non-participating bystanders are reporting you as spam! As the site POLICEMAN and self appointed site JUDGE and ADMINISTRATION OFFICER I really beleive that you should take more notice of these people and start a few other threads and see if I take any notice of them. I could comment on some of the other rants but I wont bother, some of the Ethnobotanicalists and bush lawyers will get offended. I dont feel that any further comments are required by me and this thread will go on for years if it follows the prosecution but there will be no successful appeals in this matter so it could be over when the defendents do some time at Her Majesty's pleasure regardless of the beliefs of their supporters.

Dale, As for prohibition, they can choof up and drink as much grass and mushrooms and all of the other shit as they like, I could not care less as long it has no direct effect on myself or my family and I am not expected to pay for the after effects and any harm caused. I have had plenty of friends that use more than a bit of harmless grass. No I dont support prohibition on anything except the vile lying corrupt coppers, public servants and the grubs on the bench in the pretend courts conducting their LEGAL PROCEEDINGS under their rules. As for the snide remarks, they dish it out and I give it back. Do you want some examples ? This case will never be successful even after the conviction in the lower court and any belief that it could be successful at a later date in any higher court is fancyful. The system is designed and has been manipulated in the way it has for this very reason. Time will tel and that will be another two or three years before they get back to attempting to get into the OFFICE of the High Court of Australia.

Where is the agro you goose, have another joint, dont you like to hear the truth about the illusion you have all been sucked into.