jondoe

(However I have to concede that you can suggest it, (as you did) even though the content of your suggestion is (as you certainly know) totally and utterly wrong.) Tell me, why would I be wrong ? Your Englsh skills are not the best are they ? No the costs are not that great, a couple of grand would do the job. If they dont have their own monney they have to borrow. Why would you mention China or are you aware that they have been there on a couple of occasions ? They are not about making the rich cunts richer, they are about selling their system to make themselves and their shareholders ritcher. Us poor stupid cunts will never worry while we have plenty of piss, drugs and TV.

I can suggest that this remark is incorrect, But alas, I now thing it is an elaborate hoax I keep in touch with Lu Britts weekly and it is no hoax, the only hoax are the people who are wanting the use his system but they dont have enough of their own money to pay for it. The new prototype is producing six to one at a 100rpm.

Below is the last paragraph of a speech given by Kevin Rudd in Sth Aust some weeks ago and found at the web address. http://www.pm.gov.au/node/5219 That if we’re serious about this principle, that we’ll make a difference here in this community by being in this together. For the challenge, ladies and gentlemen, lies with you. Work with us. Work through your local members. Work through the local priority employment coordinator. There is no monopoly of wisdom on our part in terms of what’s going to work in this community. I know enough about local community life from where I come from the People’s Republic of Queensland, that everywhere is different, okay. Everywhere is different. And everyone’s got their own best ideas about how things should be done and you’ve got your own best knowledge and your own best networks.

The extract from the site I provided identified two names of the persons involved. One is an ex-federal police officer from the NT and he lives in Irvinbank on the Atherton Tablelands and he is not game to take another matter with the Brigalow arguement in to any Qld pretend court as they have warned him that he will pay for all of the costs in any further attempts to argue this rubbish. David will not even concede that he has not yet been into a statutory court constituted in accordence with the public policy created by the defacto government. we don't have feee simple rights to our land anymore? You have never had the above because it is collateral for the State Corporation's debts but you do have fee simple rights to the use of the land you think you have purchased. You have only purchased the rights to the use of the the land, you have not purchased the land regardless of the alleged title printed on A4 paper. Are you enrolled to vote at the elections for the three levels of defacto government. Do you vote at the State Elections ? Do you vote at the Local Government elections ? Do you vote at the Federal Elections ?

Contacts If you have any problems you may contact me at the below mentioned telephone number or David Walter on 07) 4096 3009 or [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> or Sue Maynes on 02) 6345 1254 or email [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. http://www.saveoz.info/index.php?title=Land_ownership_removed_from_the_people_of_Queensland Contacts If you have any problems you may contact me at the below mentioned telephone number or David Walter on 07) 4096 3009 or [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> or Sue Maynes on 02) 6345 1254 or email [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. They have been driving this garbage for years and wonder why they were tossed out of every pretend court they have taken this rubbish to. If we are a corporation what part do you play willingly ?

I know exactly where you got this rubbish from and who created it. You have got the wrong corporation, its the State of Queensland Australia and the Queensland Treasury Corp. Go to the links and read all of the documents listed on the site. http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1244818/000119312509132811/0001193125-09-132811-index.htm http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1244818/000119312503079928/0001193125-03-079928-index.htm

I can only suggest that if he absorbs all of the bits of information provided on this topic he will end up in jail. I will suggest that he goes into the so called court and he does not leave the public gallery when called to the bar to speak to the alleged magistrate. Then demand that the magistrate provide a copy of his Commission, his instrument of appointment, issued by the Governor as this has now been done in Queensland on four occasions in Bris, Prosapine, Rockhampton and Cairns on several occasions in one particular matter where the defendant is being prosecuted by R the complainant ( who the fuck is that) and that is what is displayed on the alleged evidence brief provided by the Police. The Magistrates cant provide a copy of their Comission because it DOES NOT EXIST its one big scamm and they know we know. Others have also demanded these documents from their local Members of the Parliament but none have provided anything. The Office of Sue Boyce, a Senator from Qld has also requested copies of these official documents from their State brothers and six months later nothing has been provided and no reasons given. If the grub on the Bench is not a properly commissioned judicial officer with an instrument of appointment signed and sealed, he cant deal with any complaint from the Police without your express consent but they trick you into giving your implied consent. If you enter into the boundries of the court and leave the public gallery, and move into his personal court, you have provided your implied consent to the individual, pretend magistrate, hearing the complaint from the Police. We are not yet a Republic, but if you allow them to deny you your rights as a sovereign individual they will take your money or jail you so that the Corporation running the Prison ends up with your BOND and they make money on it while you are in their care. Dont give the grub on the bench jurisdiction, he does not have it without your express consent. In Queensland this has been the only thing that upsets the Bench, he wont go any further with the matter if you stand your ground. Also take a tape-recorder and record every word but dont do it openly they simply dont want you getting evidence of their criminal offences. Neutralise the Magistrate and the Police have nowhere to go

Who can provide an explanation for the forced sale of private homes for the non pament of rates ?

My medication, or I should say my diet, has not made me cranky and I dont know how you have come to that conclusion but its your right to have that opinion. As for your statement half our problem is we spend so much time getting on eachother's nerves Its very obvious that I have got on somebodies nerves, the people on this site dont get on my nerves at all so I dont understand why you make that statement as its infers that the people on this site get on my nerves, if they did I would not bother posting any comments on this site. As for the information I provide on this site, I dont see anybody suggesting its incorrect and prooving I am wrong, the problem is they simply dont understand the facts of how our LEGAL SYSTEM has been hijacked by a particular section of the community and the elite members of the legal profession who have absolute control over the other pretenders. When you realise what is happening behind the scenes, or what has NOT taken place in relation to the creation of so called laws or public policy, you may have half a chance of being successful with your pursuits in relation to the medical use of your favourite plant or other substances. lightning I see no gain being made by denying the jurisdiction of the courts or challenging the integrity of the court to their face. If you honestly think that there is some integrity in the court and that it has jurisdiction to exercise judicial power over your rights, what do you base this belief on ? If the so called laws are not created in accordence with the State and Commonwealth Constitution and these laws create the courts and the judicial appointments, dont you think it would be prudent to actually check that all the procedures have been done correctly in compliance with the Constitutions. The facts are that this has not happened, and it has been done this way specifically so the jurisdiction is provided by the parties before the court and not the law or authority of the grub wearing the black or red robes in the court room. The courts can only exist or be constituted in accordence with the laws created by the Parliament that you all take part in electing and the one very important procedure is the Royal Assent issued by the Governor or Governor-General for and on behalf of the Sovereign. We are not yet a Republic are we, we are alleged to be a Constitutional Monachy with a westminister system of government. If this Royal Assent has not been issued, properly signed and sealed, it has not happened at all, so we dont have laws with force, only terms and condition of public policy set out in the Bill passed by the Legislative Assembly in Qld. Qld does not have an upper house. In the Commonwealth it has to be passed by both the Legislative Assembly and the Senate.

NO reptyle Also...I'm going to court on Monday for possession of a Prohibited substance, namely three grams of DMT... I am pleading not guilty If you were in posssession of the DMT why are you in denial ? Why enter a plea at all ? All you have done is give him jurisdiction to hear the complaint being made by the Police. Is the grub in the blackdress up on the bench authorised to be there ? The following is an extract from the Queensland Constitution and it would appear that the Magistrate also has to have his piece of paper, "Instrument of Appointment", just like you with your drivers licence. This question was asked of a Magistrate in Brisbane yesterday and the reply was yes, I have one but I dont have it with me and he refused to produce it. Does he have an " Instrument of Appointment" issued by the Governor of Queensland displaying on its face the Public Seal of the State and the Governor's signature, I will bet he has a bit of paper with some mark on it that you could assume is a signature but it wont disoplay the Public Seal of the State. Page 39 of the Annotated Queensland Constitution. A seal is a device that leaves an impression on paper and provides a mark of authenticity on certain official instruments. The “Public Seal of the State” is the seal that demonstrates the Sovereign’s authority in Queensland. Examples of documents that the Governor seals with the Public Seal of the State include commissions appointing members of the judiciary, Deputy Governors, Ministers and Executive Councillors, as well as various types of proclamations.

I did not provide a sugar coated opinion either way and I dont beleive that I could honestly say that I am againt the ethnobotanicalists as I rely on a form of medication for pain releif in the same way, but I try and use substances that dont effect my thought processes and wipe me out for hours or days. If any person wishes to use MJ for medicial purposes or pain relief that is entirely up to them but public policy dictates otherwise and they know that. I have not made my mind up about any opinion posted on this site, cant see why you did, I just provided opinion and supportered the opinion with evidence to support my comments, it got removed to another thread by the local forum Policeman so I guess that he has made up his mind as well. I am suggesting that this matter will never be dealt with in any bulshit statutory court, they are not courts exercising judicial power without your consent, they are legal proceedings, conducted by member of the legal professiion and the self litigants, surreptitiously created with the implied consent of both parties under their statutory rules and they are dealing with public policy made by the very people who you willingly elect to sit in the Parliament and create this soft law for and on your behalf. Nothing to do with the Queen or the Sovereign whoever that my be. If you beleive that any other person has the authority to exercise power and affect your substantive rights and you consent or apply to go into their legal system you will be bound by the results of the fraudlent process that you have willingly entered into. It is a commercial system as you enter into a contract with the court (tribunal) to deal with the matter in dispute, you pay them a fee to conduct the business of the court. I suspect that it would have been a thousand dollar fee plus, to have the High Tribunal Office close the doors on the application for leave. I have seen many many applications go the same way and this scamm will continue for many years to come.

Well, how can I respond to this little gem, non-participating bystanders are reporting you as spam! As the site POLICEMAN and self appointed site JUDGE and ADMINISTRATION OFFICER I really beleive that you should take more notice of these people and start a few other threads and see if I take any notice of them. I could comment on some of the other rants but I wont bother, some of the Ethnobotanicalists and bush lawyers will get offended. I dont feel that any further comments are required by me and this thread will go on for years if it follows the prosecution but there will be no successful appeals in this matter so it could be over when the defendents do some time at Her Majesty's pleasure regardless of the beliefs of their supporters.

Dale, As for prohibition, they can choof up and drink as much grass and mushrooms and all of the other shit as they like, I could not care less as long it has no direct effect on myself or my family and I am not expected to pay for the after effects and any harm caused. I have had plenty of friends that use more than a bit of harmless grass. No I dont support prohibition on anything except the vile lying corrupt coppers, public servants and the grubs on the bench in the pretend courts conducting their LEGAL PROCEEDINGS under their rules. As for the snide remarks, they dish it out and I give it back. Do you want some examples ? This case will never be successful even after the conviction in the lower court and any belief that it could be successful at a later date in any higher court is fancyful. The system is designed and has been manipulated in the way it has for this very reason. Time will tel and that will be another two or three years before they get back to attempting to get into the OFFICE of the High Court of Australia.

Where is the agro you goose, have another joint, dont you like to hear the truth about the illusion you have all been sucked into.

Lightning, I will post what ever I like on this thread and you can choof up as much dope as you like. You have admitted that your doocument is not SEALED and only stamped with a rubber stamp that displays the design of the seal on the stamp on the page. You have also admitted again that you had only LODGED the documents, they have to be FILLED in accordence with the rules of court but you appear to disregard these procedures. As for the alleged ORDER of the High Court of Australia, its not SEALED with the SEAL OF THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA so this process has not been ISSUED out of the Registry of the High Court, because it never got FILLED, it has never been in there but if you snort up some more of the medical grass it wont really matter anyhow. As for the alleged signature of the Registrar on the pretend HIGH COURT ORDER, can you read the full legal NAME of the person who allegdly signed the so called ORDER, no you cant because its not anybodies signature, its an autograph by an unidentified person. You wont find the full legal signature of any person on any government or court document anywhere in Australia and they know exactly why they have to conceal their identity, it will attach full commercial liability to the legal person who is identified by their signature being displayed on the documents. I suggest that before you dig the hole any deeper for the defendants you read all of the legal definitions in the Black's law dictionary as this is all that applies in our LEGAL SYSTEM, not judicial system, it just does not exist in this country where we do not have a Sovereign Government. You should start with the words sign, signature, sign-manual, autograph, file and lodge Either jump on board and use your obvious intellect to help in the fight or stay out of the thread please. Why would I wish to jump on board a sinking ship that is bound to run aground anyway, and I have no intentions of staying out of the thread. Was it too embarrissing to display the alleged HIGH COURT ORDER, put it up on the site for all to see or stop your pretence that is having a very detrimental on some other person's life.

So one of the Justices of the High court has made this statement, Pursuant to r 41.11.1 we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application Were his instructions complied with by the Registrar of the High Court ? Where is this bogus order, is it too embarrissing to post the SEALED ORDER for all to see the OFFICE STAMP displayed on it ? You can assume what ever you like but you wont beat these grubs at their own game. I assume 1) is due to necessary paperwork not being lodged in accordance with the courts requirements You have hit the nail on the head here as the paperwork was only ever LODGED and never actually FILLED in or issued from the Registry of the Court. It was only ever LODGED in the High Court OFFICE and never actually FILLED in the Registry of the High Court of Australia. If you cant read and understand the rules of this club you are wasting your time going in there. Do I have to remind you about my previous posts on this subject.

Paragraph 7A of the Corporations Constitution states The Corporation is declared to be an excluded matter for the "Corporations Act, section 5F,1 in relation to the whole of the Corporations legislation." If you consider that this Corporation is registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in accordence with the the Securities and Exchange Act 1934 (US) and comes under the jurisdiction of the Laws of the United states it could mean that the reference is to our law or even their law. Under United States law this corporation, the QUEENSLAND TREASURY CORP (Filer) CIK. and the STATE OF QUEENSLAND AUSTRALIA (Filer) CIK. found at this link, http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1244818/000119312503079928/0001193125-03-079928-index.htm are deemed to be foreign corporations organised under the laws of the United States and as such the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) of the United States applies to this US registered corporation and the definition in this law of the US describes the QUEENSLAND TREASURY CORP (Filer) CIK. and the STATE OF QUEENSLAND AUSTRALIA (Filer) CIK as United States persons. http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/fraud/fcpa/ That would mean that all of our commercial dealing as corporate entities, or as we are part of the two State Corporate entities, is under the jurisdiction of United States law. Now there is a reference to " the whole of the Corporations legislation " does this corporation create and pass legislation and who does this corporation legislation apply to ? I thought only sovereign governments created legislation, laws with force and effect. If you search the United States securities and Exchange Commission web site you will find the CORPORATION LOGO that is displayed on documents sent there by the QUEENSLAND TREASURY CORP and the STATE OF QUEENSLAND AUSTRALIA and it is displayed below. It does look a lot like the corporation logo displayed on the last page of the Bills that are passed by the not so honourable members of the Queensland Parliament and a copy of one of the Bills is also displayed below. So who do you vote for, Members of the Legislative Assembly of Queensland that sit in Parliament House or the elected members of the Board of Directors of the two corporations registered in the United States ? This applies to all States and the Commonwealth. Before the QUEENSLAND TREASURY CORP and the STATE OF QUEENSLAND AUSTRALIA CORP took over completely the logo displayed on the alleged Royal Assents belonged to the United Kingdom and this change was made some time after 1991 and the old logo is displayed on the third document. Does our Commonwealth Constitution provide for this Queensland Corporation Government registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and deemed to be a United States person or are we being scammed ? You will also notice the alleged signature of the Governor of Queensland on the Queensland Constitution Bill 2001, but it is not the signature of Peter Arnison, the then Governor, its an autograph by another person as we have many many samples of Peter Arnison's signature or autograph on other official Government Instruments. Why are they doing this and what is the real purpose of FORGING the Governors signature on this Instrument of Government. So I think you could say it again, what the fuck does this mean ask your lying corrupt local Member of Parliament.

Two car loads of thugs from the Qld Police Service violently removed, bashed and evicted an elderly invalid pensioner with a serious heart condition from a Housing Unit operated by the Qld Dept of Housing and Homeless in Cairns. The exercise of brute power was based on an alleged order made by a 67 year old drunken Magistrate who was convicted for drunk driving on the Gold Coast some months ago and the Dept of Justice sent this drunken grub to hide in Cairns so that he could implement Govt policy in the Small Claims Tribunal. The alleged order issued by this drunken grub was invalid and he could not even identify the correct section of the Act that he claimed to exercised this power under. He may have had a quiet drink for breakfast so that he couuld deal with the stress of the job. Now the State Govt and tax payers are paying for his accomadation in the Police Cells in Cairns and I will expect further accomadation will be provided at the Lotus Creek Prison on the Tableland. Be very aware of who is sitting on the Bench if you are going to Magistrate’s Court in Brisbane as this drunken grub returned to the south east corner a couple of days after he pretended to be an acting/magistrate in the Small Claims Tribunal in Cairns. You could end up getting a criminal record issued by another convicted CRIMINAL who is too old to be a magistrate in accordence the terms and conditions of the Magistrate’s Act 1991. Brisbane magistrate in court for drink driving AMELIA BENTLEY June 29, 2009 A Brisbane magistrate has sat at the opposite side of the bar table when he faced court on a drink driving charge today. In Brisbane Magistrates Court, Arthur Gordon Dean, 67, of Highgate Hill, pleaded guilty to driving drunk on Boundary Street, West End, on May 23 this year. The court was told Dean, who is an acting magistrate, had a blood alcohol reading of .075 per cent when he was pulled over by police at about 1.30pm. The legal limit is .05 per cent. Defence lawyer Martin Burns SC said his client was "profoundly sorry and thoroughly remorseful" for the offence. "He has apologised to his former colleagues," Mr Burns said. He said Dean had also suffered great embarrassment and had let his wife and former colleagues down. "Above all others, he should have known better," he said. Magistrate Michael Barnes said he took into account Dean's former position as a full-time magistrate and said he accepted the offence was "in no way related to your position." "It's quite unnecessary for me to lecture you on the prevalence and dangers of this offence," he said. Dean was fined $400 and disqualified from driving for three months. A conviction was recorded. Dean was a magistrate between 1997 and 2007 and during his career as a magistrate he sat on the bench both in Brisbane and Gold Coast.

I strongly recommend that everybody read the following link. http://www.saveoz.info/index.php?title=Home I am fully aware of who is responsible for this web site and I would recommend that you delete it from your computer, these people are a waste of time. The so called expert is named as David Walters, an ex-Police officer from the NT who now lives at Irvinbank on the Atherton Tableland and he did honestly believe that he could go into the Qld courts as he did in the NT when locking up the harmless aborigonals and get the same result in Qld that he was able to get in the NT courts. David Walters has been playing the game in the Qld pretend courts for the last seven or eight years and its all been a waste of time but the sad and disapointing fact is he has learnt absolutely nothing from the experience. Over the past six or seven years he took it upon himself to appear in the courts and pretend to re-present every body who had a matter in the courts in relation to the Local Government and other Govt depts and the defendants property rights. He had a perfect score with his failures, 100%, because his so called unbeatable arguements got thrown out every time. His latest effort in NSW cost the defendant four hundred thousand + court costs. He took some of these matters from the magistrates court to the District court and then to the court of appeal dividion of the pretend Qld Supreme Court and on every occasion he failed to get his documents FILED and ISSUED from the REGISTRY of the statutory SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND. He never once had the SEAL OF THE SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND affixed to the process filed and issued from the COURT. He is now at risk of wearing the costs of the next case that he appears in and he will never take that risk in Queensland again and the Justices of the pretend Qld court of appeal have got that message accross to him load and clear. His last attempt was in the bogus High Court and they would not even accept his documents. The other person who is named on this web site appeared at the Inverell Forum and I have seen the vidio she produced, it is embarrising to watch and if you want to learn how to fail when claiming your rights I suggest that you watch this irrelevant vidio. I often wonder if these people are put up to lead us down the wrong path as I am fully aware of the garbage they promote. I dont like being so blunt but these are the simple facts.

You had better get used to the views of other people, we are not all Roman Catholics and what they get up to behind closed doors is pretty disturbing. If you have a problem with my views, dont comprehend or understand, or you are a child mollesting Catholic, you dont have to stay here where ever that is ? If you want additional information on any view I have and the reason for forming my view you can ask, I have plenty more to add. If you getting too disturbed about what you are reading you should check with one of your most favorite politicians and seek asistence from him/her and get their views on what I write, they wont entertain any discussions on these matters of their ignorance and incompetence when claiming to re-present us. If you read any comments made by youngdan on other web sites you may get disturbed further as I will only be to happy to claim them as well. I will suggest you have another bong, get a gut full of piss, or take a hand full of yippy pills to settle you down this appears to be the accepted way. I dont have to stay here either but I will post what ever I choose and if its too disturbing dont read it.

Note that they dont indicate State or Commonwealth corporation law. They do this to give you plenty to do. They create hundreds thousands of pages of this garbage every year, you will never keep up with it ever. Its all irrelenant anyhow, just policy so if you dont like it ignore it but watch you back as the blue shirts and pretend courts are involved up to their ears as well. It all about taking our money and property to fund their very existence and retirement at a level we can only dream about.

Hutch, I dont agree with this at all Since all law is contract it cant be written that way and be correct if we are alleged to be a Constitutional Monachy with sovereign authority to exercise judicial power over our God given rights. This is the function and duty of the Sovereign to determine our rights through the elected members of Her Parliamet. The reason the alternative is being alleged is because we dont have what we think we have, its all bogus and an illusion. I do totally agree with the view of the legal status of the Councils but tell me why are they able to sell the property if the rates have not been paid. I dont agree at all with the other statement about the Parliaments as they dont make laws, only policy and after its passed in both Houses it becomes PUBLIC POLICY. If the proposed law after passing is not given Royal Assent issued by the Sovereign's representative, Gov or Gov-Gen, they are not law with any legal force or effect without our consent. They get that is a couple of ways but only implied as we dont know what we are signing or the impact of the form we are signing. The Parliaments dont operate under any constitutoin in the Commonwealt or the State of Queensland because they are quasi Corporations and their policy only binds the members or share holders of those corporations. the Commonwealth of Aust and the State of Queensland are registered corporations in the US Security and Investment Exchange and all of the financial details of debt is recorded there for the public to access. In Queensland we have the Qld Treasury Corporation and in its Constitution, provided by the elected members of the Board of Directors of the Quasi Corporation State of Qld, the members of the Parl;iament provides these policies. They claim that its the Qld Treasury Corporation Act ( Law with Force) but in fact its only an act, something they have done that created policy, not law. 7 Corporation represents the Crown The Corporation represents the Crown and, subject to this Act, has and may exercise and claim all the powers, privileges, rights and remedies of the Crown. 7A Excluded matter for Corporations legislation The Corporation is declared to be an excluded matter for the Corporations Act, section 5F,1 in relation to the whole of the Corporations legislation. 8 Legal capacities of Corporation The Corporation shall be capable in law of— (a) suing and being sued; and ( compounding or proving in a court of competent jurisdiction all debts and sums of money due to it; and © taking, acquiring, holding, letting, leasing, dealing with and disposing of real and personal property; and (d) doing and suffering all such acts and things as bodies corporate may in law do and suffer or as are prescribed by this Act.

Why do you say only that, are you not capable of constructing more than one sentence. Who do you believe authorises the magistrate's exercise of power when administering punishment penances ? It aint the defendant/victim the Police have draged in, or is it ? You have used the term penances, are you a Roman Catholic ? If you are, you would walk fee from the magistrates court ever time, the Roman Catholics run the LEGAL SYSTEM and the Public Service from top to bottom.

Yes it was the Justice's opinion and that is all that matters regardless of what is provided by the politicians in the Parliament prior to the hearing as we are alleged to have some form of precedent created common law. If they did not agree with this opinion they could have amended the terms and conditions of the policy set out in the Local Govt Bill. If you want to consider it as law with force that is entirely up to you, but I consider it policy just like an insurence policy, terms and condition of a contract or agreement and any issue in dispute is dealt with under contract law. If they continue to claim that the decision of this court of apeal is valid based on these opinions of those three Justices who have judged this matter and which are supported by other justices in other decisions in other courts in all States, it would appear that what they say is correct. For this severe limitation on his rights as owner, he has received and will receive no compensation, although he continues to enjoy the privilege of paying the rates that the Council levies on his land He agrees to pay the rates levied, its not an impost under law with force, he does consent to enjoy the privilege when he does not have to. With this agreement to pay the fee levied it is implied that he also consents to the severe limitation on his rights as owner as he has never stated that he reserves all rights as an individual who holds land under fee simple title. This particular case is used in all States of Australia in relation to these issues of land clearing and the jurisdiction of the Council which we give to them on a platter when we agree to have this body corporate charge us a fee to provide management services for our land which we thought was held in fee simple title. If we accept the offer that is sent out to the land owner in advance, dressed up as a RATES NOTICE and we dont reject or attempt to vary the terms and conditions of the offer and we agree to just pay the claim in the offer, this is when we have elected to waive or vary our fee simple title RIGHTS to the use of our land.