curaezipirid

Ras Tafari men belong among the Abrahamic beliefs, if we align ourselves with historical origins of thought. Haile Selasi was King in Ethiopia in which Kingdom was then held to be that realm of Zion.

I have some kind of religious quandary going on over having to choose, BUT, I am able to give a scientific explanation of why. My brain got itself trained into habits of mind that are what is known in religions, as "the fourth way"; AND, (well from here on in its going to be less scientific and more religious, unless counting the history and anthropology of religions as scientific), I also happen to have realised, reading the above statement, that, the way by which the metaphysical alignments of money's secret purposes, (well that's a bankers secret fantasy know how about controlling everybody via their coin, ie what Briggs-Myers personality type are you, and what type can be imposed upon you by bankers), via the Rosicrucian craft lodges within Masonic Temples, (scientifically, yes, I visited the Theosophists secret inner library to know they are Rosicrucian, and learned that Rosicrucians are Masonic craft lodges, from an Islamic website forum where a Muslim Mason was posting . . .), who fancied themselves having some kind of dippy old control in the economy, over the religious ideas, in which "the fourth way" had any meaning. Now, in almost all of the points above, 1. 2. and 3. , "the fourth way" is a recognisable phenomenon. But so are three other ways, obviously. The names for the ways of men, come from sanscrit as the oldest known surviving lingo, and the original version of the Hindu caste system was divided into four along similar lines, but outmoded as it was never an exact fit. But all four ways are normally thought of as four ways into that room within ones metaphorical house, within which one can know the cause of one's existence, and so begin to work aligned with such cause, which is where the potential for real enlightenment etc springs from. 1. is the way of the Fakir, which means developing the "will power" of the body, by working the body's physical prowess, (saw youtube link in Facebook recent of an Indian sanyasan who had been keeping one of his arms straight up in the air for the past 10 years already, but if you don't like that idea, Cathy Freeman is a suitable role model of); 2. is the way of the Monk, which means developing the "will power" of the body, by working the body's emotions, (eg devotional prayers and Art and Music etc); 3. is the way of the Yogi, which means developing the "will power" of the body, by working the body's mind, until it sustains constantly accurate thought associations, (known to be associated with Yoga practice because control of the thinking is achieved by control of the posture); 4. is all of the above three ways working in unison. Now I did happen to know, that the Rosicrucians have been attempting to decide for themselves who gets to be in which of those four categories, via the strings they imagined having on everybody's money, via how wealthy the Rosicrucians themselves once were. AND, that the alignment they happened to have been working at, was as silly as having been attempting to prove that everybody with any indigenous Australian identifications, was only allowed to express themselves economically in the way of the Fakir, (as though dead if expressing other ways, but they did not really have that kind of control, they only imagined to have). However, when it gets put in the terms of there being 4 possibilities to choose from in belief, I say, well what about the fourth way! Which one is it! My head reckons like this: 1. Abrahamic faiths have to be the way of the Yogi, because all the good sanity rules are in those religions. 2. Eastern religions have to be the way of the Fakir, because between them they have both Yoga and Tai Chi, and those are my favourite physical disciplines, and I hear Dzogchen practice is quite cool. 3. Indigenous religions have to be the way of the Monk, because they are all held stable by ancient initiatory rituals, by which men get taught the fundamentals of how to enable the emotions to be kept clean, and in control of the reins of choice making, . . . a kind of an intuitive sensibility we all seem to retain from our ancestors whoever our ancestors happen to be, that being responsible for intuitive sensibilities, is important. but this leave the atheists in charge of the fourth way or is it that fourth way adherents are in charge of the atheists either way amounts to very much the same in that within the belief, be it fully atheist, or fully fourth way, (in which it is taught, that all "willingness" and "doing" is only possible via One God being who is ultimately willing), it all amounts to the same I think I resolved the quandary I had now thanks everybody Therefore, I hate to have to say so, but I choose, . . . A Theism

potential natural remedies to help out . . . . for real, that may be a good punishment, . . . the quote above was kind of where my head was at until I read the whole thread, but I'd seen his "maybe I won't be back" thread, so had to keep reading but my head went, he's gay, no he had faked an online identity here, NO he is really circumcised, and so I voted for clothed humiliation thanks everybody, (not that the circumcised version is not preferable). I think he could be decently clothed in his humiliation by having an open thread, of him divulging his secret fears, and anybody who knows anything about homeopathy, trying to take his case and figure out what homeopathic remedy could cure him. But maybe that was only because I got involved in vual's homeopathy thread, so have a brain association between these forums and homeopathy in development.

Hmmmm, well normally I am a total purist when it comes to using any plant as an individual substance, seperate from other plants, and normally I would have looked up the most traditional method, and followed it, and done nothing else, but with Heimia, (I have only tried it as a dried herb), I first left heimia plus a eucalyptus lozenger for the oil in it, and a small amount of alchol to kick start the processes, in a jar of purified water for 24 hours in the sun, then put it on the stove briefly, and boiled the pot dry, then added more water, and drank that. It had the ear hole effect for sure, but I don't much like my earholes being messed with, so I don't really want to do it again now, but I did also try the dried leaves in another combination, mixed with: mexican dream herb, and a few more eucalyptus lozengers, and a little alcohol again, some mucuna, and grated daikon radish. Same deal, left it in the sun for 24 hours, then cooked it, and boiled it dry, twice, (added water, and boiled that dry too, in fact two of my saucepans are still scarred as a result of the burning, as I charred all the leaves and radish . . . got to have good timing to reduce pot risk), then with the liquid from the third time I boiled it dry, I drank half, (tasted great by comparison to unburned heimia), and added chocolate and coconut and sunflower seeds, and flour to the rest, and cooked it briefly, and wound up with loads of very small nasty tasting chocolate brownies, that worked a treat. But as I say, I didn't much like the ear hole effect, and found it was almost entirely only a feedback loop of me myself. Which isn't good for the hearing.

certain people may certainly be certain on your behalf there rumple

aiming for world peace by dot becoming a dragonologist rather than a psychonaught or daytripper or a kakteen vannen, (in senior varieties also), or dreaming dreamer or mad scientist etc etc etc means something else I presume, related rather to what kind of posts we get up to, as well as quantity, . . . . . . any plant headed robots around

either that or a Difficult Method Tariff cat scattering hawk

the phat cat lunch pat pawed walk talk hawk (for excellence in momentary thought)

I thought the advantage of gypsum is that it works its way down into clay, without needing to be mechanically dug down by human hand. So it is a good option for a place you may want to establish a no dig garden bed, and/or, if you don't want a hole in the clay pan to fill up with water. Also, if it is going into a larger pot, although it seems silly to use clay in a pot because we don't need to, I often put into pots some of the soil from the surrounding garden, mixed with whatever is the cheapest potting mix I find, just to see how the plant is going to cope in the local soil conditions, before transplanting it into the ground. Might give the plant a chance to adjust itself too, depending if it is able to adjust.

a couple of links to science headed value reading, just in case anybody still waits on that developing into the total story suddenly http://hpathy.com/sc...nanotechnology/ (turns out scientists were wrong about the placebo value of homeopathy, but only wrong by a few stray atoms) I think that to understand the principles involved, a person needs to have homeopathic remedies prescribed for themselves and individuals, AND, to actually make a remedy from scratch, for giving to somebody else. The experiential lesson is invaluable. http://aminchakrabor...logspot.com.au/ (that weblog is a collection of good ideas about what else could be happening simultaneous with nanoparticles being present) and next a couple of links of myself having a bit of a yarn about what I've been doing in homeopathy, (despite being newly an online student at an institute that discourages students from practicing, I have already been prescribing on and off during the past 9 years, and had good results; homeopathy is unregulated legislatively in Australia, and regulated by voluntary membership of professional organisations who can enable private health ensurance rebates for anybody who pays for private health insurance, who are not who I have treated, . . . however my current situation as a student of homeopathy at a professional, and apparently well reputed, institution, which seeks to sustain the knowledge of homeopathy as the privy of only their own graduates, causes me to need to promote my skills in Shamanic healing rather than skills in homeopathy, and simultaneously discourage other students from aligning themselves with me), aligned with indigenous Shamanic type healing: http://forum.hpathy....t-of-addiction/ http://anexorcistspa...24/hello-world/

That is the bottom line of course. What is best for an individual patient, and also their community, simultaneously. Did it matter if somebody believed homeopathy is only a placebo effect, if they are going to train themselves to prescribe well nevetheless, supposing that all the work in prescribing, is a kind of psychological assessment which helps in and of itself. So long as they know when to refer a patient for any serious condition they could not treat, there is no harm in even homeopaths considering homeopathy to be a placebo effect, if the science is beyond their mind to conceive of. The science exists, and is real, but does it matter if we don't know what and why, so long as we know how, and are responsible in how.

Maybe we let some folk believe it is no more than a placebo, just because that is the easiest way for them to accept the efficacy. Of course placebo theory depends on the patient being told it is something else, but homeopathy works on animals, and plants, and children respond better than most adults. With remedies which are prescribed in repeat doses, there will be another effect not apparent until a while after your partner stops taking the homeopathy. We have to be very careful not to cause patients to become addicted with repeat doses in homeopathy, which is the sad irony in the placebo theory, that sometimes a doctor might say that a person became psychologically addicted to the placebo effect, but when in fact, the remedy could be causing a specific nightmare, which would not come into the conscious mind until after the patient stops taking the remedy, . . .

Why yes, yet how in control of our conscious mind are we! and , . . . well, . . . what might we have created out of illusions, if not diseases, . . . (if not disease, then the flora and fauna, and geology, is what Shamanic healing is all about, . . . and homeopathic remedies are a marvellous aid in shamanic work)

It is not that like repels like, but that like can cure like. Curing is different from repelling. Think of how soap works, its molecules are long, so their shape replicates the shape of oil molecules, and they attract the oil molecules by polarity, but this is essentially another like curing like effect. How homeopathy got explained to me the first time I visited a homeopath, is that the remedy is like a big bad monster in the subconscious mind, (or even in conscious dreams), which is bigger and badder than the disease, but simultaneously it and the disease are attracted to one another. So they fight it out in your subconscious mind. Kind of like Gandalf and the Balrog, going down together, and the bodies immunities are like the reborn Gandalf.

Yes homeopathy can cure a disease at the root. I have experienced such cureS, and it is a quite hard journey to accept as a patient, but worthwhile. However, I believe other disciplines, like acupuncture, acupressure, and osteopathy, (especially cranial osteopathy), are just as effective at curing. Also, you can fix cancers with homeopathy, sometimes, yet with only the most highly individualised prescriptions, but no cancer cure will ever be guaranteed, because, knowing the Shamanic way of curing it, the patient really has to be prepared to give up a lot of self concept. Also, as I understand homeopathy, I would not like to take repeat doses of any remedy for warts, . . . but as I wrote already, us homeopaths tend to disagree in what potencies to use and whether to repeat a prescription. I got taught the way of single dose high potency prescribing, by a lay homeopath with a busy enough practice that his wife stayed at home to care for their six kids.

read MIMS to know, that the pharmacuetical companies don't know how most drugs work that the main difference with homeopathy is that a patient needs an individualised prescription, (except in certain cases of epidemic , . . . as my work in homeopathy for addicts exists), and pharmaceutical companies simply hate that idea, of the right medicine being one out of a few thousand, which may take an hour to find, AND, the medicine itself can be easily replicated; makes the whole idea of homeopathy simply less profitable than all the cruder medicines that have the same effect on everybody . . . each homeopathic remedy, will effect each person differently, and it is a finely attuned skill to work out which remedy will have the most curative effect on which patient and at which time . . . a lot of people don't use homeopathy mainly because there are few really very good homeopaths around

Actually it is perfectly logical. An "anti-body" has "anti-" not "ante-" as its prefix. A controversial issue among homeopaths, is whether or not, in developing a new immune response, a patient may need, or not need, to experience what is called a "homeopathic aggravation" which is usually like a briefly experienced rash, or welt, on the surface of the skin. I kid you not, I once had a susceptibility to having head lice cured in me, and the remedy caused instead, a load of super itchy welts, starting at my tummy, at around 6pm one evening, (times of day are really important for finding the exact right remedy in homeopathy, and nobody wonders much why, it just is), then moving out from my tummy covering my torso, then starting down my arms and legs, then no more at dawn, then the next evening they came back, but started where they'd left off the night before, and moved down to my hands and feet, and by the third night, the itchy welts only appeared on the palms of my hands and soles of my feet, then no more. Then, no more head lice ever again. Even when in contact with. Well, an occasional odd louse if I am in contact with a lot in children or something, but no infestations like I used to get. But I did have to take the homeopaths advice to stop using petro-chemical treatments first, which had started not working at getting rid of the lice anyway.

Nicely expressed! Do we need to know more than that it works, and is it rather that we need learn how to make it work at its best, which is within that hour long consultation, of course.

I agree with the above good points, but take care not to over indulge in use of the word "imagine" please. (You know one of the commonalities between all ancient cultures and religions, is a saying alike "the only thing nobody can imagine is dying" . . . and one would not want to go imagining diseases into existance, would one!

The think about all placebos, is that the patient needs to be told it is something more than a placebo. But if it works on animals, and without a patient needing to believe in it being more than a placebo, then it is more than a placebo. That's one way to find out whether a homeopath is good at homeopathy, if they can tell you it will work without you needing to believe in it. Good points. Further thought along the same lines, is that pharmaceutical companies don't support homeopathy, because it is more accessible to everybody for less money, since a remedy once made, as in once it is diluted, so long as it is taken care of well, holds and can be replicated from the original, eg put that sugar pill into a bottle of brandy, and you have a whole bottle of potential new sugar pills, when drops of brandy land in bowls of sugar. Bizarrely!

Here I go again, . . . sorry guys for expecting anybody to trudge through my brain bludgeoning here, but I am enjoying reading everything in this thread, and wanted to have more say: The important point in the quote above, is that among all professional homeopaths is incredible disagreement about what homeopathy is, how it works, and why. In fact many homeopaths radically disagree with one another even about basic rules such as how to prescribe safely. Yet somehow something is working for all of them, presumably. I'd say some are indeed total charlatans, and others can do the real deal, alike to Shamanic work, but the insideous nature of homeopathy, is that it avails itself to charlatans to profit from, and so be careful who you get homeopathy prescribed by, is the most important know how in the field. You'd think if it's nothing, it couldn't be harmful, but it can be quite bad for longer term health consequences, (either because it is a placebo when something else was needed, OR, as I believe, it is very alike to acupuncture in how a disease could be suppressed as readily as cured, if the wrong medicine was to be prescribed). Some homeopaths prescribe to suppress diseases as they make more money that way, so be very cautious.

Nice thread. I don't have to look too far inside for the world to get weird on me. I mean, I have seen a vision of Jesus, which is totally not weird now I have seen him, just like cool. But normally I don't see shit inside my mind, or have external visions either, . . . I mean, I know how to use my third eye, but I don't like to except under duress, or if I really have to. But weird things happen around me, all the time: then that same trip repeats on me over and over and I feel unable to stop the same weird stuff happening again. Kind of like a de ja vu that won't go away, and . . . well I am in one now, that's been here all week without drugs. There is a rule, or custom, in Aboriginal culture, that if you have that kind of de ja vu, experience, (and I have lots of different threads of different kinds of de ja vu that potentially creep up on me), you are supposed to simply act within it different from how you ever have before. Getting good at taking new different action within de ja vu, kind of holds all the memory repetition in place. So I kind of fall into constant re-examining of memories, that is all it is, feeling like a trip repeated itself on me. But weird, only by comparison with most people's experience. And normal within indigenous culture. And as for the experience that freaked me out most, it was after I had been reading Aboriginal Dreamtime stories. I had learned an idea from the middle east, Judaic originally but held in Christianity and Islam also. From a Sufi text I got hold of. The idea that the nature of the story we live in throughout our life, (in Indian scriptures it is one of the kinds of Karma, but there are 4 or 5 kinds, so not all ideas of what Karma can be are counted as this, this is the body's innate life bringing Karma, not the stored Karma), is something we need learn to know, and is defined by the combination of our ancestry and place of birth, or songline we are born upon; AND, in knowing that story we may speed it up, or slow it down, as we need, but it is impossible to alter the sequences of, as they relate to the shapes of landforms like mountains; AND, to find out what story is our own body's special life giving Karma, we only need surf the net, or look at the children's books in the library, or the TV guide, and chat to our mates, etc, etc, etc, and it will be that one story we always fall into, and cannot escape. So first also realising my whole family have very remote indigenous ancestry, (like too far back for anybody to have had pieces of paper that could get indigenous identified jobs or abstudy today), I start reading Dreamtime stories with that idea in mind, (as well as looking through all the different stories of other lands, of all my other ancestry, in the mythology section of my local public library), and there is one story that kept on sticking to me uncontrollably. I wound up knowing the Greek version is Persephone, (and Ta'mar in the Bible), the Indian is Kunti, Sumerian Inanna, and a Cow Goddess in Ireland, PLUS, some of the brothers Grimm tales fit the bill, etc, etc. So then I find the indigenous version, about old man Roo, (male version of same, like Joseph in the Bible), and his mob, in a verion known as Koopoo the Kangaroo, who dug a hole in the riverbed for his family to drink from, but it was too deep for swimming, and they are happy, but then the dogs come (a whole other story there about how the Kangaroo gets its tail, . . . ), and the dogs chased the roos all around Australia, until old man Koopoo, jumps into his billabong he dug, and at the bottom turned into the Rainbow Serpent. This is in the version from Katherine, which coincides with the same songline of my home town of Armidale NSW. Then, next time I travelled back to Armidale, when I get to Kempsey, (where the songline meets the sea, but I didn't know that then yet), I see a road sign pointing to Armidale, and I think it must be the way, so I turn, expecting the road to take me through the Bellinger Valley, but that way stays on the coast until further north, and instead the road I took went up the McLeay river valley, via Bellbrook, and a road called "Big Hill". Now I'm a sole parent right, traveling along with my three then primary school aged sons, and so we've got to stop for a picnic, etc, etc, but my fears are all creeping up on me, like severely, (that is the rainbow coming on in mind), and I am becoming increasingly paranoid, especially every time the road descended or went too near any water, and I am having to really really concentrate on behaving normally so as that my sons didn't worry about me. So I am driving slow, and carefully, and simply observing the contents of my mind, rather than letting the fears get the better of me. But along the way, we see animals beside the road, and I point out all the animals I am seeing to my children, who look and see also. By the time it got dark, I had seen every one of the animals that appear in the Koopoo the Kangaroo story, in the right order of the story, at the exact places the story says, (eg the story said a black headed carpet pythons appears on top of a hill, after Koopoo turned into the Rainbow Serpent, and I see a red bellied black snake at the top of Big Hill, and the difference of type of snake is explained by location and my personality combined). So by the time all that came real, I figured it safe to start telling the Aboriginal community that my family have indigenous ancestry too, and sure enough, they don't want me identifying on paper for a job, but everybody indigenous who already knew me, now says, "yeah, we always knew that about you". It was a bit bloody freaky the day it happened though, like a whole cultural paradigm shift went down inside 24 hours without drugs. But nothing beat a vision of Jesus. He is vibrant and glowing and perfect to see for real, and seeing him saved my life literally, as I am in love that day at a bigger badder blacker biker's house than any white girls are normally safe at. But nobody harmed me. It was cool. I see ghosts and shit too, ever since that day, in 2002 I traveled along the McLeay river valley, and back up Big Hill safely. That is, I see if I want to look, and there is all sorts of stuff I could see if I looked in the way black men have to be seeing all the time; but more normally I don't want to have to have a look. I sort of simply instruct the bad guys to leave me alone, in mind, when I smell something odd, or something is not aligned right in place and time; but black people always want to look more to see what the problem was, and they get it that I smell too, etc, so they don't hassle me to be looking like they might sometimes have hassled other white people into using drugs so as to have a look at how they see things. But many Aboriginal people see inner visions of animals and trees etc etc etc all the time, and relating to everything, even in big cities, like deciphering everything going on in everybody else by what animals and plants they can see corresponding with. Which is how reafforestation etc will manifest, I guarantee. I also saw that space cowboy sword swallower performance artist once do spoon bending in front of 300 people at an Art Gallery Christmas cocktail party too, that was weirder than weird, now I think about it. I roused on him afterwards too, and told him that if he bends spoons like that on my head again, he bloody well better have bent them into the direction of reafforestation. And when I watched Blair Witch project, I'd already known it is a hoax, but forgot as soon as I picked up the DVD cover, and read it, then same day, I had some heimia salicifolia, and calea zacatechichi cooking up together, with grated daikon radish, that I drank, then started to remember a friend having dumped on me her fears for her teenage sons, . . . . . . .(lets not go there),(to the town in the USA were some teenage mongrels made a film hoax), and I got my fears back under control in the folk lore of Japan, about the Daikon demon. Like in the children's film, "Spirited Away". Then looked up blair witch in the internet, and found it to be a total hoax, much to my relief. Life just is weird if you ask me, BUT, I sure am glad of being an Aussie, since I reckon our culture is by its nature more scientifically minded. Y'know like if a thread like this was in an American forum, it'd be hell. But here, its simply got its share of cute cuddly marsupials that would actual scratch your eyes out if you were too close in the night.

thinking

these pictures are turning me into a fan of longer larger spines on cactii, that is, if I didn't already know I am that . . . something has to deter people making a meal of it

saw this link today, and remembered I'd started a thread here: http://preventdisease.com/news/11/022811_solar_activity_consciousness.shtml It refers to a New Scientist article about how solar flares are effecting us biologically. Mine came up trumps, so I hope everybody else's sunny days are working out good too.