∂an Posted July 23, 2011 I see some retail outlets are still selling kronic products openly. does anyone know the current legal status of JWH in QLD? I remember reading a month or so ago that they were moving to ban it, but have not heard if this has come to pass. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
7baz Posted July 23, 2011 I see some retail outlets are still selling kronic products openly. does anyone know the current legal status of JWH in QLD? I remember reading a month or so ago that they were moving to ban it, but have not heard if this has come to pass. it will happen in AUG , not sure when. same goes with VIC , its still being sold here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bread Filter Posted July 23, 2011 does anyone know the current legal status of JWH in QLD? The more common ones were federally scheduled on the 8th July 2011. Reasons for delegate's final decisions, July 2011 – synthetic cannabinoids The decision The delegate has made a final decision on the scheduling of specific synthetic cannabinoids. From 8 July 2011, the following eight substances will be listed in Schedule 9 as prohibited substances: (1-(5-Fluoropentyl)-3-(2-iodobenzoyl)indole) (common name AM-694); 2-(2-Methoxyphenyl)-1-(1-pentylindol-3-yl)ethanone (common name JWH – 250); (1-(2-Morpholin-4-ylethyl)indol-3-yl)-naphthalen-1-ylmethanone (common name JWH – 200); Naphthalen-1-yl-(1-butylindol-3-yl)methanone (common name JWH – 073); 1-Pentyl-3-(4-methyl-1-naphthoyl)indole (common name JWH – 122); 1-Pentyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indole (common name JWH- 018); 2-[(1R,3S)-3-Hydroxycyclohexyl]-5-(2-methylnonan-2-yl)phenol (common names cannabicyclohexanol or CP 47,497 C8 homologue); and 2-[(1R,3S)-3-Hydroxycyclohexyl]- 5-(2-methyloctan-2-yl)phenol (common name CP 47,497). Source Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
∂an Posted July 24, 2011 The more common ones were federally scheduled on the 8th July 2011. okay, thanks. I wonder what the retail vendors are selling then? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
∂an Posted July 25, 2011 I read today in MX that there is a loophole preventing queensland police from enforcing the law Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
badwolf Posted July 28, 2011 (edited) The more common ones were federally scheduled on the 8th July 2011. Source No [redacted] I see. Good news for a wino I know. Bad news for everyone who thinks this POS legislation is just more mind/thought control by the overseers. Shit, you cannot even buy a Bong in WA now, and if you're caught with personal herb then it's enforced Intervention sessions. LEARN WHAT WE TELL YOU, DO WHAT WE SAY. YOU DIRTY CRIMINALS. http://www.dao.health.wa.gov.au/Drugsandalcohol/Thelaw.aspx Edited July 28, 2011 by badwolf Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
badwolf Posted July 28, 2011 okay, thanks. I wonder what the retail vendors are selling then? Well there are still a plethora on the horizon, some purported to be stronger than jwh-018 (: And kronic is/was a blend of a few RC's. Hell, even Pineapple Express was shown to have a legitimate prescription drug in it, causing it to be willingly pulled from sale in NZ. Thanks to this kind of legislation, god knows what is going to be crept in to bypass idiotic mind control laws. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Torsten Posted July 28, 2011 it will happen in AUG , not sure when. source of this information? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
7baz Posted July 28, 2011 (edited) source of this information? my source is not confirmed , its word by mouth from 2 different adult store owners who said the matter went through to parliament on july the 1st here in vic.. the same day it was banned in NSW. no idea of the outcome so far.. im only assuming and using logic knowing how parliament works that it would be banned around aug.. both store owners said around AUG. but now im hearing of this loophole in QLD. anyone know exactly what this loophole is ? will it apply to VIC too ? Edited July 28, 2011 by 7baz Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Francois le Danque Posted July 29, 2011 yeah what exactly did the mx article say? the mx is where i found out it was being banned federally, and no amount of internet searching could retrieve any information otherwise (at the time). pretty indicting of our shitty government that we have to find out we are being made criminals by reading a free tabloid newspaper.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
7baz Posted July 29, 2011 yeah what exactly did the mx article say? the mx is where i found out it was being banned federally, and no amount of internet searching could retrieve any information otherwise (at the time). pretty indicting of our shitty government that we have to find out we are being made criminals by reading a free tabloid newspaper.... MX newspaper from my eyes isnt a very reliable source for news. half the frigging newspaper is fabricated with made up stories lol. on the other hand the story may well indeed be true.. but who really knows. anyone got the article ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
qualia Posted July 31, 2011 mx - isn't that murdoch owned? at any rate on the odd occasion i find one on a train it seems filled with entertainment gossip? i doubt they're striving to be a beacon of reputability,, Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Torsten Posted July 31, 2011 there is no such bill in front of the Vic parliament at the moment. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
