Jump to content
The Corroboree
  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
lotuseater

peruvianus from GW is it an Icaro?

Question

I've looked at the "how to recognise a peruvianus" thread as well as many other threads to see if I can match my plant to anything.

Reading all the information has left me more confused than before, some knowledgeable opinions would be most appreciated.

I absolutely love the colour of this plant! :worship:

post-13932-0-55938900-1385552007_thumb.j

post-13932-0-53354000-1385552093_thumb.j

post-13932-0-45016200-1385552155_thumb.j

post-13932-0-62564100-1385552267_thumb.j

and a little bridgesii seedling I picked up at the same time

post-13932-0-78595700-1385552368_thumb.j

post-13932-0-55938900-1385552007_thumb.jpg

post-13932-0-53354000-1385552093_thumb.jpg

post-13932-0-45016200-1385552155_thumb.jpg

post-13932-0-62564100-1385552267_thumb.jpg

post-13932-0-78595700-1385552368_thumb.jpg

post-13932-0-55938900-1385552007_thumb.jpg

post-13932-0-53354000-1385552093_thumb.jpg

post-13932-0-45016200-1385552155_thumb.jpg

post-13932-0-62564100-1385552267_thumb.jpg

post-13932-0-78595700-1385552368_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

11 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Splendid specimen. Looks similar to icaro peruvianoid to me.

Edited by tarenna

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Thank you. I was confused because the areoles seem quite large compared to other peruvianus I have looked at. The only ones that looked similar were the icaro's.

Also lack of notching threw me off too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Yea that is splendid - def a peruvianoid similar in look to Icaros - looks similar also to what some people call "macrogonus" and I see a bit of the cuzocoensis look in there as well.. Fear not the large areoles, as they are in vogue - Roseii #1 and Roseii #2 set the trend for this..

Edited by nitrogen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Not sure that's a bridgesii.

Do you have any thoughts on what it is, a hybrid of some kind maybe? Here's another angle

post-13932-0-84134500-1385581676_thumb.j

post-13932-0-84134500-1385581676_thumb.jpg

post-13932-0-84134500-1385581676_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Yea that is splendid - def a peruvianoid similar in look to Icaros - looks similar also to what some people call "macrogonus" and I see a bit of the cuzocoensis look in there as well.. Fear not the large areoles, as they are in vogue - Roseii #1 and Roseii #2 set the trend for this..

Yes I can see the the mac and cuzco influences (minus the wavy deep ribs), which only gave me more questions :wink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Looks like a regular T. peruvianus to me. I'm not sure of the value in trying to pin a clone name to particular plants, especially if provenance is unknown. The other is a T. bridgesii for sure. I suspect its spination will follow the species as it matures.

~Michael~

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

The bridgessi looks nice. I bought one labbelled 'con' that has a similar shape.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Thanks everyone for your help. Cacti are such magical creatures that we shouldn't be worried about taxonomy, but it is a pleasant distraction to consider such things.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Sure thing. I have been looking into the whole icaros thing and even asked julio to send me pictures of the mother plants he usually harvest the seeds from. Because of the various types of types one can get from those seeds. I asked him if my seedling looked like any of the mothers. And he said yes. I wonder if he would have said it looked like the mother plants anyhow.

post-12597-0-46010200-1385628392_thumb.j

post-12597-0-46010200-1385628392_thumb.jpg

post-12597-0-46010200-1385628392_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Sorry, false alarm on the bridgesii. The spines looked too 'regular' from the top, but it's clearly a bridgesii from the side view.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×