Quill Posted April 23, 2011 Hi I'd love to get an ID for this guy. It's pretty much the only cactus in my collection that I don't know the history of. I don't remember where it came from. Whaddya reckon? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 CβL Posted April 23, 2011 It's peruvianoid (large areoles, that characteristic side-profile). The way each areole seems to grow a large upper spine after some delay is a feature of my macrogonus. So I'd say it's possibly a macrogonus, or at least it's very close to that. Is the flesh lighter in colour than plants grown almost next to it? I found my macro was lighter. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 Quill Posted April 23, 2011 yeah i was leaning towards macro. Definitely more glaucus than surrounding pachs Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 Evil Genius Posted April 23, 2011 Hi Quill, it looks a little bit like Macro. Very nice spine coloration. bye Eg Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hi
I'd love to get an ID for this guy. It's pretty much the only cactus in my collection that I don't know the history of. I don't remember where it came from. Whaddya reckon?
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites