tripsis Posted February 27, 2011 (edited) Perhaps I'll get a close-up of a typical areoles and its spination. It really does not look like a typical peruvianus in person, at least not like any other cactus that I have labelled as peruvianus. Edit: here's a close ups of a few areoles. Typical areoles: An atypical areole (although not all that unusual for older growth): Sorry if this has derailed your thread a bit Archaea... Edited February 28, 2011 by tripsis Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gunter Posted March 1, 2011 no problem, it is close enough to topic and isn't disrespectful in anyway, it is a welcome intrusion Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tripsis Posted March 5, 2011 So what make you say that santaensis is pachanoid Archaea? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mutant Posted November 1, 2013 nice thread! bumpity... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
