naja naja Posted August 15, 2007 (edited) K, I think it's a non native. Just because it's got corms where the PODS should be. When it was in flower ( not pictured )It had flowers that looked more like Eucalyptus erythrocorys. ANy Idea on what it may be or atleast a family of acacia to start searching in? Thanks in advance Naja Edited August 15, 2007 by naja naja Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ferret Posted August 15, 2007 K, I think it's a non native. Just because it's got corms where the PODS should be. When it was in flower ( not pictured )It had flowers that looked more like Eucalyptus erythrocorys. ANy Idea on what it may be or atleast a family of acacia to start searching in? Thanks in advance Naja i thinks its probably a hakea of some sort, they always look like phyllodes to me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tonic Posted August 16, 2007 Hakea laurina Pincushion Hakea. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
naja naja Posted August 16, 2007 It ain't no pincushion hakea, I know wat they look like. This had diff flowers from that. Just embarrassing since I'm a trained Horticulturalist. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PD. Posted August 16, 2007 LOL, dont feel too bad naja, EVERYTIME i visit a nursery i see the Hakeas from a mile off and im like, Ooh Ooh acacia acacia, then i get a lil closer and its, Goddamn nother hakea bastid. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tonic Posted August 16, 2007 Can you post a pic of the actual flower naja? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gerbil Posted August 17, 2007 (edited) ah don't stress naja, horticulturalists aren't trained botanists and vice versa. I don't understand what you mean by corms? the dealio where the flower emerges? I'm a little rusty but am pretty sure they are referred to simply as bracts (and their specific type/placement) and are present with many Australian Acacia (but you prob know that ). Referring to the fruit? It'll be a follicle Any further details on the plant? flower colours/structures, plant size/shape etc. As much information as you can give about the whole plant will get you a better response, minor details are almost always helpful in plant ID. I suppose habitat/soils sort of ID is shot due to council planting it, unless it's a local. i think there is a lucid series Hakea/Proteaceae ID being produced, or is produced, but I can't find much info atm. Probably still in the works as the site summarises flora grants in 2006/2007 : "Completion of key (Lucidâ„¢) to all species of Hakea (Proteaceae) in Australia State Herbarium of South Australia $20 560" http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity...e/31/index.html Edited August 17, 2007 by gerbil Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
occidentalis Posted August 17, 2007 Yeah It's definitely a Hakea - and I would have called it a pincushion hakea but as we all know common names aren't really worth much when IDing something. I used to have one the same in my yard. As gerbil says, they aren't corms - corms are things like bulbs that are at the base of a geophyte plant such as Chasmanthe or Watsonia. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gecko Posted August 19, 2007 Hakea laurina gets my vote. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites