TheExplorer

Damn, I don't think I can go past that offer. Thanks mate! VVVVV Gets a cactus mix: 25 x L.W. var. texensis (texana), 100 x Trichocereus peruvianus var. matucana (Icaro), 100 x Trichocereus pachanoi x Trichocereus scopulicola, Small bag of rare seeds - few of each (L. fricii, L.W. var. decipiens, L.W. var. caespitosa, L.D. var. Koehresii (pink flower), L.D. cv. iboginkan, L. koehresii, L. jourdaniana) VVVVV

Aww man, you just ruined my dreams. I've been thinking of doing a similar project for a long time, but now I'll just look like a copycat. Actually screw it, my idea was better anyways.

Maybe Psilocybe weilii? It's pretty rare, found only in Northern Georgia (and in isolated cultivation).

Joe Rogan is also very outspoken about his use, and the benefits, of DMT. He even has his own isolation chamber/flotation tank in his house. /derail

Haha, actually now that you say it, they do remind me of Salad Fingers: From the top view they also look like Loph-headed worms/snakes coming at you.

Etiolated to the max. The birds eye view of them, to me, looks like they are moving and have left trails behind them, haha.

Wow, more delicious cactus porn, . Thanks Bretloth. I love your columnar Lophs btw, hahaha.

Done.

I don't think so. Check this: 'A person found to be unlawfully importing or exporting a prohibited substance may be committing a range of offences, both criminal and civil. A person may incur a fine of up to $110,000 and/or five (5) years imprisonment under the Customs Act 1901. If it is a border controlled drug or precursor, penalties under the Criminal Code Act 1995 range up to a fine of $825,000 and/or life imprisonment.' http://www.customs.gov.au/webdata/resources/files/LegalHighsFactSheet.pdf The Customs Act has an analogue section covering importation and I think the Criminal Code Act covers the possession and sale of RCs. The Criminal Code Act is a Federal Act, which means it trumps all state and territory acts. A good example of how Federal law trumps State law is currently taking place in the US where the Feds are taking down medical marijuana growers and dispensaries even though they are operating legally under State law That's my take on it anyways.

I'm pretty sure they used ambiguous wording to cover all bases. I too have been curious about the nbome series. It is a derivative of the 2c series which is structurally similar to mescaline, but the nbome compounds themselves look quite different. I don't understand all of that chemistry mumbojumbo in section (2) though, so I can't be sure either way.

If you were to subtract or replace something (instead of addition) the new substance would still likely fall under this: (f) otherwise a homologue, analogue, chemical derivative or substance substantially similar in chemical structure; however obtained, except where the drug analogue is separately listed in subsection (1). Oh and yeah, the emoticons are representative of the smugness of the gummerment while they taking away our liberties.

Schedule The Criminal Code Chapter 9 Dangers to the community Part 9.1 Serious drug offences Division 314 Drugs, plants, precursors and quantities Section 314.1 (2) A substance is a controlled drug if the substance (the drug analogue) is, in relation to a controlled drug listed in subsection (1) (or a stereoisomer, a structural isomer (with the same constituent groups) or an alkaloid of such a controlled drug): (a) a stereoisomer; or ( a structural isomer having the same constituent groups; or © an alkaloid; or (d) a structural modification obtained by the addition of one or more of the following groups: (i) alkoxy, cyclic diether, acyl, acyloxy, mono-amino or dialkylamino groups with up to 6 carbon atoms in any alkyl residue; (ii) alkyl, alkenyl or alkynyl groups with up to 6 carbon atoms in the group, where the group is attached to oxygen (for example, an ester or an ether group), nitrogen, sulphur or carbon; (iii) halogen, hydroxy, nitro or amino groups; or (e) a structural modification obtained in one or more of the following ways: (i) by the replacement of up to 2 carbocyclic or heterocyclic ring structures with different carbocyclic or heterocyclic ring structures; (ii) by the addition of hydrogen atoms to one or more unsaturated bonds; (iii) by the replacement of one or more of the groups specified in paragraph (d) with another such group or groups; (iv) by the conversion of a carboxyl or an ester group into an amide group; or (f) otherwise a homologue, analogue, chemical derivative or substance substantially similar in chemical structure; however obtained, except where the drug analogue is separately listed in subsection (1). (3) The trafficable quantity for a drug analogue described in subsection (2) is: (a) unless paragraph ( applies—the trafficable quantity set out in the table in subsection (1) for the controlled drug to the which the drug analogue relates (whether directly or indirectly); or ( if the drug analogue relates to more than one controlled drug listed in the table in subsection (1)—the smallest trafficable quantity set out in the table in subsection (1) for any of those controlled drugs. (4) The marketable quantity for a drug analogue described in subsection (2) is: (a) unless paragraph ( applies—the marketable quantity set out in the table in subsection (1) for the controlled drug to which the drug analogue relates (whether directly or indirectly); or ( if the drug analogue relates to more than one controlled drug listed in the table in subsection (1)—the smallest marketable quantity set out in the table in subsection (1) for any of those controlled drugs. (5) The commercial quantity for a drug analogue described in subsection (2) is: (a) unless paragraph ( applies—the commercial quantity set out in the table in subsection (1) for the controlled drug to which the drug analogue relates (whether directly or indirectly); or ( if the drug analogue relates to more than one controlled drug listed in the table in subsection (1)—the smallest commercial quantity set out in the table in subsection (1) for any of those controlled drugs.

Oh man, I'm sorry to hear this d00d. Perhaps the person that lived there before you had enemies. Maybe ask the neighbours if they saw anyone... or if the person that lived there before was dodgy...

Done.

Awesome weekend. Nice to meet you Hillbilly and Marcel. Thanks again for hooking up that guestlist Hillbilly, it was much appreciated. I have no idea where you guys went for the rest of the weekend, so I guess we'll just have to catch up at the next one (hopefully soon!). My gf took a few good videos of the main stage on Saturday, so I'll chuck them up here when I get them off her.

Yeah I bought some from that guy. Once you include posting they aren't that cheap and you probably get what you pay for in terms of quality. The ones the guy had on the weekend looked the same as the picture, pretty healthy and reasonable size. I got a bit of a mixed bag: 2 really dehydrated light-green cuts, 2 skinny pieces of old dark-green growth (one had a nice 10cm little pup though), 1 nice blue tip cut, and 1 little old thick piece which is scarred and rooting all over (I'll probably throw it down on it's side). Also, the packaging was terrible, as all of the cuts were sent in a box with no padding or anything. This meant that all of the cuts I received were covered in piercings, some with the spines still stuck in the flesh. I'm not sure, but I think this guy sells them expecting people to use them for something other than growing. He also sells one other product which would support this theory. TL;DR: While the price is pretty cheap for bridgesii, you get what you pay for.

I take it you mean Monster Mash? If so, see you there!

Nice collection mate.

As already stated above, there's a good chance the RC you ordered is illegal (under the analogue laws). I would: 1. NOT make any contact with customs. 2. Ignore any further correspondence. 3. Clean my house of anything illegal. 4. Be prepared for a knock on the door.* 5. Be prepared to lawyer up.* * Especially if it was ordered under my own name and/or it was a sizeable quantity.

Haha, I looked at those and considered making one as well. I think I'm going to go with something else though. As for tickets, I bought tickets for my friends and gf and was hoping to use the guestlist for 1 (me). You can get tickets on the gate for $80. I'm not sure who has tickets and who doesn't, but it looks like there are around 5 people in this thread who are going.

Hey neighbour! I recognised that watertower as soon as I saw it. I even have nearly the exact same picture of that second monster specimen:

Yip Yip martian/alien?

I was just going to stumble around the village yelling out your forum names, but I guess the costume thing could work as well. Haha. I think I've seen your picture on the noisy chicken forum Hillbilly (if that is you...). Do you know if Toby is going? He's the only SAB member I've actually met before.

Agreed. Many people fail to realise that some of the civilisations that have existed over time were actually quite advanced in certain fields. For example, this (old) video shows how one man alone could construct something similar to Stonehenge using only basic materials:

Roll call time! - TheExplorer