Jump to content
The Corroboree

IceCube

Members2
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    297

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by IceCube

  5. Posted

    Alright lets get this moving again offer is

    chilli seed, silk tree seed, boronia seed

    pm Sameria

    trichocereus seed 25x psycho0x macro, rosei1x scorp, macrox rosei1

    Pm madhouse visites

    20cm pachanoi and 20cm desmanthus Illinoensis

    pm me

    That should get someone's attentions

    vvvvvv

    Keen bro!!!!

    Next person get a HEAP of peres cuttings (thick, untouched for years, displaying spines not glochids - sort of indicates maturity to me), some kava drinking powder FRESH from Fiji, and a Caapi cutting (will have to chill a little bit to make it safe to send )

    • Like 4

  8. Posted

    Hey guys - guess who is back ;)

    Basically each person gets 7 votes and 196 (slightly less now) votes are required for the question to win and be asked in the Australian Senate - so not that many people need to do it, and you can just log in using Facebook to avoid lengthy registration processes etc :)

    VOTE: http://oursay.org/s/4cs


    PRISM's drug law reform question is now in 2nd place with 409 votes. It needs another 196 votes (as I write) to get into the lead and make it to the Australian Senate. What a great opportunity this is, especially at a time when states like NSW are making backward decisions, supporting prohibition without any scientific evidence. Please go here to make your 7 votes count:http://oursay.org/s/4cs

    PEOPLE POWER !!!!

    • Like 7

  11. Posted

    http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/queensland-government-bans-synthetic-drugs-before-schoolies-week-celebrations/story-e6frfku0-1226195262918

    Can't find a link to the actual list at the moment, however here it is:

    1-Pentyl-3~1-naphlhoyl)indole (JWH 018)

    2-((1 R,3S)-3-hydroxycyclohexyl)-5-(2-melhyloclan-2-yl)phenc> (CP 47,497)

    9-(hydroxymethyl)-6,6-dimethyl-3-(2-methyloctan-2-yl).

    6a, 7,1 0, 1 Oatetrahydrobenzo[c)chromen-1-ol (HU-210)

    1-propyl-2-melhyl-3-(1-naphlhoyl)indole (JWH-015)

    1-hexyl-3-(1-naphlhoyl)indole (JWH-019)

    1-butyl-3-(1 -naphlhoyl)indole (JWH-073)

    1-pentyl-3..( 4-methoxy-1-naphlhoyl)indole (JWH-081)

    1-Penlyl-3~ 4-melhyl-l-naphlhoyl)indole (JWH.122)

    1-[2-(4-Morpholinyl}ethyl)-3-(1-naphthoyl)indole (JWH-200)

    2-(4-methoxyphenyl}-1-(1-pentyl-1 h-indol-3-yl)-ethanone (JWH 201 )

    1 -pen lyl-3~2-<:hlorophenylacelyl)indole (JWH 203)

    1 -penlyl-3~ 4-elhyl-l-naphlhoyl)indole (JWH 210)

    2-(2-Methoxyphenyl )-1 -( 1-pentylindol-3-yI }ethanone (JWH-250)

    2-( 3-m elhoxyphenyl )-l-{ 1-pentylindol-3-yI }ethanone (JWH 302)

    1-penlyl-3-(4-<:hloro- l -naphlhoyl)indole (JWH-398)

    1-pentyl-3-[( 4-methoxy)-benzoyl]indole (RCS-4)

    4-methoxyphenyl(1 butyl-1 H-indol-3-yl)-methanone (RCS-4 (C4))

    1-cyclohexylelhyl-3-(2-methoxyphenylacetyl)indole (RCS-8)

    1-(5-fl uoropentyl)-~2-iodobenzoyl)i ndole (AM-6I14)

    1-(5-fluoropentyl}-3-( 1-naphthoyl)indole (AM 2201)

    Pravadoline (WIN 48098)

    5-(1 , 1-Dimelhyloctyl)-2-((1 R,3S)-3-hydroxycycJohexyl(-phenol

    (Cannablcyclohexanol or CP 47, 497 C8 Homologue)

  12. Posted

    at the time I posted this it was before parliament. it could have been passed in a matter of days/weeks, but was instead referred to committee which usualy adds a few months.

     

    Thank god! There is still the original clause added in '07:

    Definition of Dangerous Drug

    The definition of dangerous drug in section 4 has been amended so as to

    include a chemical that is an analogue of a dangerous drug (i.e: a drug that

    is structurally similar and has a similar pharmacological effect to a

    dangerous drug listed in the DMR). The purpose of this amendment is to

    target underground chemists who make slight changes to the molecular

    structure of existing illicit drugs to create new drugs not covered by the law

  14. Posted

    I can't talk about it just yet. Maybe in a week or two. not specifically listed, ie it was an analogue.

    There are other cases, but I only know about them through an industry body and don't have a huge amount of detail nor authority to make details public.

     

    No worries man, update us if you can please and I will pursue some more information as well!

  16. Posted · Edited by IceCube

    what do you want to know? I followed this case quite closely and have talked to sasha about it a few times.

     

    Just interested about how it "went down" - was 2c-b scheduled and then the guy prosecuted etc etc. What was he doing, what was the defence (specifically why was Sasha called out?), how badly did he get sentenced....

    Lots of errors in this even though it is only a few days old. The prohibition is far wider than this page indicates.

     

    So what is the actual go? I've heard of people importing large amounts of AM-2201 whom were intending to produce incense just having their packages blocked by customs and no more coming from it. It's so hard to obtain information from the govt without just importing the compounds and seeing what happens!

    How is the federal-state dynamic working at the moment? The media release from the ACT government posted on that site I pasted alludes that only the states have the power to prosecute such matters, whilst I've heard anecdotal reports of people getting raided by the feds for producing one of the synthetic cannabis products on sale in Queensland currently and for example a quote from this website:

    http://www.cqnews.com.au/story/2011/11/11/is-there-kaos-in-our-mine-sites/

    "While synthetic cannabis has been banned in 16 countries and is illegal in Australia, regulation and control is limited, and legislation only outlaws specific compounds," Mr Korkoneas said.

    For example in section f) how does case law define "substance substantially similar in chemical structure" at the moment? Is there a percentage of atoms that needs to be similar or is it handled on a case-by-case basis etc etc. Any supporting documentation/transcripts would be wonderful. I have access to university databases if someone wants to show me to how look up a case.

    Furthermore have there been any prosecutions for importation of JWH-like compounds as of yet? And if so, what were the respective outcomes?

    Do the feds even prosecute controlled drug charges ahead of the states?

    It would be interesting to see how things like 25c-NBOMe would fit into the Queensland analogue rules as it has quite a unique receptor-binding profile when compared to similar substances.

    So yeah,happy to put in the man-hours to compile the information, I just need to be shown how to look the stuff up!!!!

  19. Posted

    Hmmmm I was always under the impression that the onus was on the individual states to integrate the TGA scheduling recommendations into their own policies apart from Victoria which apparently does it automatically. Would really love T's take on the whole thing!

  21. Posted

    Yeah well the only one that remotely applies is:

    (i) by the replacement of up to 2 carbocyclic or

    heterocyclic ring structures with different carbocyclic or

    heterocyclic ring structures;

    But the group is being added not substituting an existing one

    Also interesting thing I just found on the Wikipedia 2c-b article regarding it's legal status (it would be the closest substance to most NBOMes):

    Australia: Controlled and on the list of substances subject to import and export controls (Appendix B:). Placed on Schedule One of the Drugs Misuse and Trafficking Act when it first came to notice in 1994, when in a showcase legal battle Chemist R.Simpson was charged with manufacturing the substance in Sydney NSW. Alexander Shulgin came to Australia to testify on behalf of the defense.(to no avail).

    Would be interesting if someone could dig up some more information. I have access to most uni databases if someone tells me what one to query!

    • Like 1

  24. Posted

    Whilst I am not sure about the whole anthropogenic climate change, I support changing over to a greener economy. I don't think the tax is the way to do it though, rather an ETS and funding for programs to develop technologies so that money is directly invested in the technology rather than relying on market pressure to force companies to emit less. Think of the carbon sequesteration abilities of hemp!

    • Like 1
×