Jump to content
The Corroboree

Zedo

Members2
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    466

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Posts posted by Zedo

  1. Posted

    I too was once a mad long haired riff smith of the ax land :)

    miss those days. Now I'm going bald lol. 

     

    One thing I myself looooove so much these days is the ability to analyse my own thought process. How an idea is formed or inserted, and based upon previous experience this then shapes the coarse of the idea. With such a 'ridiculous' concept I wanted to see what others thought. But without the standard 'trolling' behavioir that comes hand in hand with the internet lol. 

    I dont know you guys and I'm still newish but I've had nothing but good vibes from here so hence why I put this forward. 

    Ive never believed the earth is flat, but given my analysis even though not proven - I can't say I believe in a spherical earth (or lumpy oblate).

    I don't believe anymore. Belief is but a guess, a hope, a desire - until proven. But what defines proof? Proof is perception of the experience. Sure we can all agree the 'scientific proof' that a cacti is green. But the blind man can't see so he can only believe the sighted that's it's green. He has no perception of the experience that's it's green other than what he's told. 

    Is our perception inadequate to truly prove a concept - scientifically? Or is scientific proof just a justification of ones perception believed by others?

     

    think I just got side tracked and had a rant lol. The mind... lol

    • Like 5

  3. Posted

    That video seems pretty good. I see both either curvature or end of sight on the horizon. If you can only see so far you will only see a circle sorta shape before u cant see no more. This is where I feel the math really takes place. The viewing angle at that heigh should show much more curvature than what 'is' shown. Also I still think lenses play a big part to distort a view one way or another. 

    Also looking at older photos from authority NASA, they show far more curvature than what is presented today from NASA. 

    Good video but I feel it's doesn't 'prove' one way or another. Thanks though.

     

    i had an interesting thought followed by seeing an interesting video in light of 'science'.

    science is the ability to assetain factual evidence to prove a theory by conducting situations or experiments that will always conclude the same result (correct me if my view is wrong).

    since we can't perform many of these tests ourselves, we are left to believe another. 

    Realistically it's no different than believing a religions scriptures written by those you don't know. 

    Like how many people are 'experts' in their field yet have never 'experienced' first hand the topic they study? I'm sure there's at least one. And someone learnt off then etc etc. 

    i love science. I really do. But I think prehaps (even disregarding the topic at hand) we take to much as fact without even giving it a second thought because their trusted experts. 

     

    Look at the recent news about 'finding' this new close solar system and planets from NASA. Is NASA the only space organisation? Why don't we hear of discoveries from any other country around the world? 

    • Like 2

  5. Posted

    I can see your view, and by all means I fully accept the claims warranted that go with a flat earth model as absurd and well yeah... a cosmic conspiracy is well over the top. Im not some doom sayer running through the city with a bible sprooking of the end lol. but I do feel that people dismiss too many things without fully evaluating the whole picture. I too am guilty of this on many things. I guess it's part of the ego some times. As I said before what's got me is the math. That's where I question it. 

    I do know how different existence can be when you look through a different lens, so possibly all this could be perspective in a sense. Like going from looking at circle to a sphere to a 'hologram' ? If that made sense.

    • Like 2

  6. Posted

    Ah yes I have heard this and it does make sense. Though I'll be reading into it more.  

    I have read/heard arguments against the original calculation. One was something to do with it being set and not found, therefore other devices are calibrated to said calculation.

     

    good point though. Thanks. 

     

    Still not sure how this changes/adjusts/verifies or denies either theory. 

     

     

  7. Posted · Edited by Zedo

    yes very true. Truth cannot be debated. I'm looking for an explaination as to how the math in relation the to earth doesn't line up with a spherical earth. Once again I'm not advocating either way. Im mearly expressing that to myself (and apparently many others) something doesn't add up. 

     

    To be honest the first thing that came to mind when this concept took my attention was 'a wet spinning tennis ball'. 

     

    Could it it be possible it's a 'compressed' sphere to a degree (if that made sense) and flat vs curvature is but perspective depending your position and orientation. ( I have no proof of this concept, it was just a thought)

  8. Posted

    this ones not the full video but skip through just past half way. As  the camera rolls around due to wind you can see the curve of the earth bend both ways from the horizon. Just shows to me that the camera isn't a reliable method as it can produce both results by changing the angle from the horizon .

     

  10. Posted

    I'll do a search and post some vids. While i am not the creator of the vids I can't vouch for their authenticity but there does seem to be 'proof' to a degree. The biggest issue with videos from what I understand is the lens. If the camera looks level, the earth is 'flat'. If the camera is angled down, the earth is curved in the notion of a sphere. If the camera looks up the earth curves the opposite of down, ie the convex earth. The flat earth debate is also the debate on 'gravity' as I see it. 

    while im not pro at the subject, it appears to me the 'key' is the gravitational constant. It's debatable as to whether it is legit or made up. Reason being is there's no way to replicate or test the results. Even though it was discovered well before computers. So in turn if this constant is made up, no Astro physics maths can be accurate let alone calculatable. 

     

    I'll post some vids. Like anything watch it critically and make your own judgement.

  11. Posted

    Just on a side note. While I wasn't thinking of this while I was in Fiji. If I look back and remember, we did a 5 hours ferry ride through lots of tiny islands. Some very flat. As in less than 6ft above sea level. These islands appeared fro the distance from a grey blob to become an island. While I can't verify this atm, I'm pretty sure due to curvature of the earth they should have risen over the horizon rather than just becoming clearer. 

     

    The sight distance over horizon seems to be one thing to really support the math. 

  12. Posted

    Over my life I have come across the flat earth theory numerous times.

    Primary school was when I remember learning the earth is a sphere. At the same time I used to go to church with mum and I remember the non sphere bible teaching at one or two occasions.(FYI I'm not religious and never liked church etc. but do respect the fact some people are) but at that age I was still a sponge and absorbed info without too much question. 

    High school I remember coming across the theory again. But at this age it was really just brushed off as a pre dated biblical theory which science disproved many many years ago. So pretty much didn't do much but heckle the idea. 

    Just out of high school I'd awakened to many ideas that we are being controlled and lied to on many levels. Upon other theories I came across in my quest for truth, the flat earth once again appeared and I looked at it with more of an open mind. But at the end I saw the proof given to sphere and ticked it off the list. 

     

    So so where am I now and why am I bothering to post about this? Well I'm 30 now and over a year back my life was flip on it's head and I began to fully awaken. So I'm not too young to be a sponge nor too old to teach new tricks lol. But last week I really came into question the shape of our home.

     

    Why now and not then? What's different now? I realise awakening changes everything in the way you can't explain to the sleeping. But this is obsurd. Flat earth? Or at least not a spinning ball? Bullshit I say. But....

     

    while I'm no math professor, I do use math everyday for work. Circles, arcs, tangents, angles, geometry. I know, understand and use many math formulas these days and really enjoy math. So I though haha I understand math now so I'll do some calculations and test this flat earth bullshit now I'm equipt with the language that doesn't lie. 

     

    And well... I'm not so sure about the spherical earth now. The math just does not add up. Looked at many vids other people doing the same math to double check my thoughts and I'm not wrong mathamaticly I'm pretty sure. 

     

    Before we start the discussion, please note. I'm not advocating a flat earth or a sphereical earth. I realise there are many points to support and disprove both theories. I also want to note that I personally do not believe the notion of a flat earth 'means' there is a creator. Which I have found a lot of. Yeah the bible has a flat earth model but this is really besides the point. So this is not a religious argument. 

    I'm looking at what I think is the most crucial.

     

    The math. 

     

    I posted this here because I have seen the community here has their eye open a little wider than the majority, so I'm hoping people can contribute their thoughts and feelings without bias slandering just cause lol. You know what I mean. 

     

     

    • Like 1

  14. Posted

    I took em out of the greenhouse 2 weeks back and we're going great. Woke up this morning to find something dug em all up and it's a mess. I could only see around a dozen left. Dunno what did it. Nothing else around them was touched. It looks like paw prints but can't be sure.

  24. Posted

    I will try report back with my own experience when I try different things. So far though - from before I knew it was RRV - I found during the bad fevers I've had occasionally, that My friend Mary gives the best head massage to help me relax. 

    And while I still haven't done the Wim Hof method I still would like to try, the basic breathing principle and other breathing techniques combined with energy direction meditation (dunno how to describe it, but that in a nutshell) works really well if you can focus hard enough to overcome the want to just fall back and sleep.

     

    Other than that. Good ole honey lemon tea (why not) is nice. One night was real bad an I did not sleep, and was so over it I took some codine which I would never do otherwise. It made me sleep which I needed but just... well you feel it the next day. I really dislike pharma, but it has its uses. Which is why I'm asking the community for natural remedies. 

    Which so far Thankyou for everyone's support. 

    • Like 1

  25. Posted

    To everyone who sent me seeds this year... and cacti. Thankyou. 

     

    The seedling are going great great in my little green house but I'm unsure when to take them out and let them enjoy the sun. I don't want them to die.

     

    so their about 5-8mm in height. When should I do what? 

     

    First pic is the seedlings..well some. And the second is the cacti I got from 3 terrific individuals in front of the Hopi blue corn which is going strong too. 

     

     

    IMG_0250.JPG

    IMG_0251.JPG

    IMG_0250.thumb.JPG.f7269b413196a51f9243b89c6dd435c7.JPG

    IMG_0251.thumb.JPG.b55d5b45da3d8634ff927fb855b754eb.JPG

    IMG_0250.thumb.JPG.f7269b413196a51f9243b89c6dd435c7.JPG

    IMG_0251.thumb.JPG.b55d5b45da3d8634ff927fb855b754eb.JPG

×