sagiXsagi

25-2-2016 sowed several seeds of 3 vars of caapi and 2 seeds of alisia in the sowing trays I had the most success with chilli. using a heat mat too

edited original post to add cuzco and alter some numbers I think whatever value this scale has is relative, that is its in comparison with each other, and not as an absolute. of course any comparison is worth it when different species have grown together in the same enviroment for a while. the abosolute measure of growth should be width x length I guess. TH, I think the rooting speed would be equivalent to the speed of growth. IME bridgesii roots the easiest/fastest of all. It also took me some 16 months or more to root a chunk of terscheckii .... slow buggers in any case I find convergence 's list very interesting, join the game

the colour is awesome because it seems to be the real deal I was joking about getting it, its too expmensive, but not ridiculously expensive, its close to ridiculously expensive, but not there yet if you regard that IMO there is no real peruvianus crest around - well this seems to be one and since peruvianus grows considerably slower than pachanoi ..... plus he is accepting offers ;)

I think a small measuring plastic pipette would be ideal I have had the same thing happen in a gymnocalicium fruit once, seeds were sprouting inside the cracked fruit!

this one too http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Trichocereus-peruvianus-cristata-799-Cactus-Plant-Echinopsis-Ariocarpus-Aztekium-/371547503892?hash=item5681f4fd14:g:4zYAAOSwnLdWs5n6

scorpio extrovert yeah. but he got a very esoteric secret side. and often a drak side.

I thought it was already becoming silly! lol

wow, excellence . boy I have to sow sum cactus seed

that should be a water sign , are you a cancer or pisces? I think I remember reading something like that

thanks mate its been a long time I have sown anything. what about temperatures? I have been germinating chilli seeds in temps varying from 25 to 31-32 C, using a heat mat for a month now Does it sound good?

I commented on the emotionless exactly because there are no emotionless people. Only perhaps some very dangerous psychopaths. I dont believe you dont have emotions.. I think I can proove it to you. being a person much on the rational-side myself, especially when younger, I had trouble expressing emotions. I was also shyer when younger.. All in all I have found I have both introvert and extrovert parts, the test showed me at 30% extrov. I think. This is depicted in my natal chart, even more detailed. sagittarians are enthousiastic / enthousiasm is an emotion.. aren't you enthousiastic ? dont you get worked up when a good debate is comcoming on? There is a wide range of stuff that are actually emotions, which exactly do you lack? ALL OF THEM? that cant be true

I understand the appalling nature of begining to question something so ridiculous as astrology. I am a rationalist myself! The repellent type of astrology your mean is only 100 years old give or take. It came with the newspapers.. But the basic system I am using is thousands years old and it doesn't refer to each day each month or each year, but to your whole life. The same chart is valid your whole life ! why the 12-sign based astrology is different from the 16-types in essence? Because one of the 16 types is the conclusion after reading and analysing the character through questions... while the conclusion of a natal chart reading, which is a complex chart with many of the 12 signs, is its interpretation that takes synthesis skills. Asking the chart questions helps to unravel it into words. The reason I often say I am a super sagittarian is that I am a bold and characteristic specimen showong almost all sagittarian traits. That doesn't mean I am not also shaped by leo, scorpio, pisces, virgo and capricon, among others, in positions which are also of importance

you're emotionless? really?

no offence taken but why should you choose one over the other? its not a football game or something. if you like the type thery be my guest, astrology is aesthetically displeasing to most people anyways I am interested in how they could compliment each other the two systems are supposed to reach more or less to similr results through a different way besides, your sun is in pisces. You're not a pisces. And if you are born from 18-24 of each month then you dont even have a clean piscean sun. You're not a pisces. there's a whole chart to be read and synthesised, the 12 signs is not analogus with the 16 types as far as understand. and both systems are far more complex than they look. introverted is indeed the most typical keyword for pisces IMO. and yeah, pisces are sensitive in that they are receptive to emotional charge of course if you thing that either arcehtype, either pisces or INTJ, can be described with 3 words, then man your just seeing the surface. its not just a list of stereotypes, it takes synthesis of all the characteristics. each person has many different signs in different degrees and positions as each person has a different marking f.e. for the Extrovert - Introvert peace

switching to the type-theory I was also thinking, about the accuracy of personality tests, as I have considered designing my own. well in personality analysis through a questionary, however well designed and planned it is, the results are as good as the accuracy the person replying . a questionary for character analysis implies that the person answering has a sense of self-knowledge. so, to sum up, maybe the test-questionary is perfect, but we have to make sure that the person answers as correctly as possible. I mean, there's a subjectivity in here too. I intend to re-do the questionary, myself, to see if anything changes.

maybe you can make a leap of faith, but only if you want to examine it for real. there's no mechanism of operation here, no proof, only a statistically significant IMO phenomenon where various traits of personality are "predicted" I am talking about the phenomenon, the "prediction" and not about any causation, mechanism of action, ect. the thing that would convince one the most is the interpretation of their own chart, assuming they have some self-knowledge in particular, natal charts seem to be able to shed light to the basic core of character. one should be able to understand and process certain aspects of psychology and general behaviour before trying astrology. and one should also have a bit of faith, or else sont bother.

http://astro.cafeastrology.com/cgi-bin/astro/natal you can do you chart here.. I used cafeastrology a lot to read about signs, houses, planets aspects positions all in all, cafe astrology is one of the best online sources to teach yourself the basic system of astrology

so you actually advise for a very gradual introduction to sunlight, for how many months? you are suggesting letting them etiolate a bit? the seedlings I mean?

he is making a heaven and he's thought all about it amazing job man!

Any hiphop MCs ??? capable of recording shit? we should do an hiphop based on ethnolyrics or sumthing I see a similar project never went on I made this today.. not my production/loop intially, but I changed it a bit..

what zodiac sign are you? f.e. sagittarius, apart from being prone to become a drunk, has a child-like attitude, doesn't like commitment and restrains... to the point of your question : it depends on the person...

strange, I could swear its a peruv in 7.1 and a bridgesii in 7.2 !

Bed of spines>> So you're an 92% sagittarian introvert? I would love to check out your natal chart unfortunately, generating it through net sites is the easy part interpreting it is another thing and it requires at least some basic underdstand of the system I have come to believe natal charts work, but only if you got questions to be ansered. And I have come to this conclusion through my own mini-research. other sagittarian keywords, apart from extrovert include: child-minded, enthousiastic, optimist, love to debate