Various trich

[solomon]

pretty sure they are all trichs, apart from the last one. my friend's not mine, we were pretty sure on some of them, just wanted to be 100%.

the pachanoids are here cos he wanted to know what varieties he may have.

thanks in advance to id-ers

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Edited August 24, 2010 by centipede

[solomon]

6.

7.

8.

9.

Edited August 24, 2010 by centipede

[solomon]

10.

11.

12.

13.

Edited August 24, 2010 by centipede

[solomon]

80 views and no comments.. caaaamooon take a guess someone

[bℓσωηG]

are you sure the last one isnt? looks like a piece off something like this which is a Trichocereus terscheckii

8.Tbm

9. looks like cuzcoensis /peruvianoid

i want 12!

[Evil Genius]

Hi Centipede, nice plants. bye Eg

1. Something between Pachanoi and Peruvianus

2. Looks Pervianoid. I have some of them too. It stays very short spined.

3. Trichocereus Candicans.

4. Isnt that some kind of Scop?

5. Bridgesii

6. Candicans maybe

7. Looks like the one in 4. Similar like a scop.

8. Bridgesii monstrose

9. Peruvianus/Cuzcoensis

10. Tr. Chilensis

11. Tr. Terscheckii

12. Pachanoi

13. Tr. Terscheckii or Tr. Werdermannianus. It looks like a werdermannianus i once had.

Edited August 25, 2010 by Evil Genius

[san p]

1. is a columnar growth from the nz crested pachanoi strain

[mutant]

Wow man Wow, that's some awesome specimens.

the Wendermanianus/terscheki clones are amazing. And so is cut in #13

1 is a bit scop-ish

2 is a beauty, dunno what this is

3,6, 11, & 13 are somewhat wendermanianus/terschecki-ish again, awesome specimens

2, hmm, yeah looks peruvianoid in the body, you're right EG, but where are the areoles and spines lol

12 a scop

agree with EG on the rest

Edited August 26, 2010 by mutant

[The Dude]

I think #2 Might be a Knuthianus?

#13 looks amazing! I want it!

[M S Smith]

My thoughts....

1) T. pachanoi – I suspect due to the bifurcation it is a monstrose/creast form. I had one that grew with alternating regular and monstrose growth upwards of two meters which I then repotted as 15 centimeter sections…and the results were, well see for yourself…

2) T. pachanoi

3) T. terscheckii

4) T. pachanoi

5) T. bridgesii

6) T. candicans/pseudocandicans? The ribs look to be a few two many and spines a bit dense for the species, but who know. I wouldn’t put it past not being a Trichocereus.

7) T. pachanoi “pachanot” or maybe even a T. scopulicola of the longer spined variety, but probably the former.

8) T. bridgesii “penis plant”

9) T. cuzcoensis

10) Pachycereus? Clearly not a Trichocereus.

11) T. terscheckii

12) T. pachanoi

13) T. terscheckii

~Michael~

PS - I'm a lumper not a splitter.

Edited August 26, 2010 by M S Smith

[solomon]

thanks everyone for your input

and thanks Micheal for listing all.

[mutant]

10)

Pachycereus? Clearly not a Trichocereus.

also looks like some Eulychnias. A beauty

[Pacha]

Michael, this crested form is spectacular! You said you "had", you mean it's gone?!

[M S Smith]

Michael, this crested form is spectacular! You said you "had", you mean it's gone?!

 

Well actually what I meant was that the plant was grown for years and is all is produced was an alternating monstrose and regular growth column till I had to cut it when it reach a little over 2 meters in height. Then when I planted the sections the new growth with the crest and bifurcation came about. So nope, still have it! It's a beauty for sure, but in serious need of a bigger pot.

~Michael~