Jump to content
The Corroboree
Sign in to follow this  
nabraxas

China's future water war with India

Recommended Posts

Is there any end to Chinese ambitions in Asia? China wishes to dominate Asia with blockades, blockages, military diplomacy and political Machiavellism.

China’s building of the port of Gwadar at the mouth of the Persian Gulf in fact is meant to blockade the oil supplies of the world. Its military diplomacy is on display at the Tibet-India border, where for the last ten years it has strengthened its military infrastructure to intimidate India. In its blockage diplomacy, it is planning to divert the flow of the River Brahmaputra, also called the Tsandpo in Tibet, toward China’s northeast, hence in the process starve 100 million people in India.

With a US$2 trillion economy, 1.3 billion souls and a $1,600 per capita GDP, the Chinese consider themselves wealthy. To them India is a poor rival, although India has a US$1 trillion economy, $1,000 per capita GDP and a superior and faster-growing technological sector than China. The Chinese think of India as a minor opponent. Their friendship with Pakistan is a Machiavellian tactic to checkmate India.

The scheme to block and divert the River Brahmaputra shows the Chinese do not care about others, only about themselves. The scheme is foolhardy to begin with. Its environmental impact on Tibet’s economy, ecology and culture is of no consequence to them, however. All they need is additional water to flush the rapidly silting Three Gorges Dam and provide water to the parched northeast.

The net consequence on India will be a manmade disaster. If 50 percent of the river’s water, which flows through the center of India’s northeastern state of Assam, is taken out, the river will become a seasonal ditch. One hundred million souls in India and Bangladesh will lose their livelihood. It will surely start a big new dispute between the two rivals and could eventually lead to a shooting war.

The river begins its journey in the glacier country of western Tibet in close proximity to the sources of other mighty rivers -- the Indus and Sutlej. Its origin is not far from the Indian border in Tibet, in the holy land of Lake Mansrovar and Mount Kailash. The Tsandpo-Brahmaputra travels west for 1,500 kilometers, hugging the northern slopes of the Himalayas through Tibet.

All along its journey it gathers more water and sustains life in Tibet. Because of its remoteness, it has long gone unexplored. The river skirts the last of the Himalayan ranges and turns south into India into Arunachal Pradesh. It later turns west into the plains of the Indian state of Assam. Multiple smaller rivers join it in Arunachal Pradesh to make it into a huge water resource. At about this place the pre-rainy season flow averages well above 120,000 cubic feet per second, rising to 1million cubic feet per second during the heavy monsoon rains.

The Tsandpo begins its long journey at about 13,000 feet and drops to about 5,000 feet in eastern Tibet, before it enters India. Through a series of mysterious falls and gorges, the river manages to drop to about 1,000 feet and then to 500 feet in Assam state. The water flow before the river enters Arunachal Pradesh is about 60,000 cubic feet per second. It is mostly fresh glacial water.

As the river meanders thru Arunachal Pradesh it receives additional water from its tributaries and then in Assam from the discharge of other streams. The 1 million cubic feet per second flow of the Brahmaputra during the rainy season is due to the topography of the land. All the rainfall in the Assam hills is discharged into this river, making it at places 10 kilometers wide. This area is known for the highest rainfall in the world, leading at times to massive flooding in Assam and Bangladesh. Flooding brings misery, but it is also welcomed as it deposits rich nutrients for better crops the following year.

Ever since they occupied Tibet, the Chinese have viewed the Tsandpo-Brahmaputra River as a source of hydroelectric power and a new source of water for the Yangtze River and parched northeast China. Numerous rafting expeditions by the Chinese military were mounted to explore the river, prior to its entry into the deep gorges in India. They were looking for a suitable site to divert the river.

The first hint of this scheme came out in official Chinese newspapers in the 1990s, confirming its intent. A Chinese-inspired paper in Scientific American in June 1996 also confirmed it. The Chinese wished to use the tremendous drop in elevation of about 8,000 feet to generate electricity. According to the Chinese account, 40,000 megawatts could be generated.

Just before it enters India, the river would be diverted through a network of canals, tunnels and pipelines to China’s parched mainland. All the electricity generated would be needed to pump the river into the new system. The advantage to the Chinese would be that the parched northwest may become fertile. Any remaining water could join the Yangtze River to inhibit silting in the Three Gorges Dam.

This scheme is twice as big as the Three Gorges Dam. About half the total capital of about US$40 billion will go to power generation and the rest into dams, diversion canals, pipelines and tunnels. The power generation capital is a net waste, as not 1 kilowatt will benefit the Tibetan populace. All of it will be needed to pump the water through the system.

The Chinese do not undertake any environmental or socioeconomic studies on large projects, lest they discover any negative impact on the environment and people. That is how they built the Three Gorges Dam, against the advice of environmentalists on locating it in a high seismic region. A major earthquake could knock this dam down or damage it. The floods that would follow could bring death and destruction to 200 million people.

The Tsandpo project could bring similar damage to the ecology and people, as well as possible confrontation with India, making it not worth the effort. But the Chinese do not care.

The impact on India and Bangladesh would be tremendous. Assam and part of Bangladesh would lose the capability to grow food. A massive migration toward the rest of India would follow. A wave of 100 million homeless people moving toward India would overwhelm it. India would surely move to prevent this from happening, and a military confrontation could begin.

In this foolhardy scheme the Chinese have counted on their financial and military muscle. They regard India, as stated above, as a poor rival. But with the livelihood of 100 million people impacted, India would muster its own financial, technological and commercial muscle and come out fighting with vigor. This confrontation could be far bigger than the present India-China territorial dispute over the possession of the Tawang tract.

In this scenario, India would have many supporters of its cause. In general, the blocking of naturally flowing rivers has not been taken kindly in human history. The world will support India. China will have a lone supporter in Pakistan.

Today’s Chinese leadership is obstinate, headstrong and overconfident of its prowess. This confidence will have to be tested, if necessary, militarily. A shooting war may follow an attempt to divert the river. In a war of short duration China would have the advantage of better infrastructure close to the border. In a broader, drawn-out war, China would be at a disadvantage as its Tibet rail and road links could be interdicted and the Tibetan population inflamed to expel the Chinese from their land. It may become a lose-lose situation for China.

Before a shooting war began, India could make its intentions known by a display of its own military prowess in the border region and in the Indian Ocean. India would have international law on its side.

U.S. and Russian support would be critical in this situation. The United States could tie down Chinese forces on their eastern seaboard opposite Taiwan, and the Russians along the Ussuri River border. As far as Pakistan is concerned, it would have to be prevented from making mischief along India’s western border. U.S. support would be needed to keep Pakistan in check.

In summary, a bigger dispute may emerge along the India-Tibet border in the form of Chinese mischief. Let us hope that sane counsel prevails within the Chinese ruling clique and the country does not embark upon the Tsandpo River diversion project.

http://www.upiasiaonline.com/Security/2008...ith_india/3300/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hey JOP, just wondering, are you chinese? nothing wrong, you just seem to be very passionate about defending china & the actions of the chinese government whenever they are criticized. like i said, nothing wrong i'm just wondering why?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This scheme is twice as big as the Three Gorges Dam. About half the total capital of about US$40 billion will go to power generation and the rest into dams, diversion canals, pipelines and tunnels. The power generation capital is a net waste, as not 1 kilowatt will benefit the Tibetan populace. All of it will be needed to pump the water through the system.

That is a bit of a pity. the scheme sounds set to piss off a lot of people. I think that Russia may back China if it came to it which is a scary thought but I done it know their situation too well so... Imo if/when WWIII starts it will be with China.

Peace

Mind

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nah paradox, im Greek,from Peloponnese (at least my parents were, i was born in aus.)

I just find it annoying that all you ever hear about China in the media is bad, they were even criticized during the earthquake they had not long ago.

I donno, i like their style in which they do things also. I saw a doco ages ago about a flood they had once, and the way they all worked together (adversity always helps tho i guess) was inspiring and i gained much respect for their people, and more recently iv been delving into their ancient past, a world in unto its own.

Add to that Every Chinese person iv ever met all the way back to primary school where good people. (much better then hanging around "wogs") in which for some reason i never really fit in with them.

So i guess athe quick way to put it is that i respect their people,

and how they have built up their nation (albeit a little too fast, hence the pollution everyone is complaining about),

and more importantly, they have lifted hundreds of millions of their people out of poverty and look to do the same in Africa, a continent that has always been poverty stricken.

Plus, just being kind to our future overlords :) Nah their cool hehe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why is this Chinas war with india?? why isent this Indias war with china?

err... because it's China that will be diverting the natural course ov the river & therefore causing starvation for 100 million people in India & Nepal.

That would be an act ov war & not cool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BEIJING: China's top water official has dismissed claims that Beijing plans to divert the Brahmaputra river that flows from Tibet into India to quench China's needs, a proposal that added to tensions between the two parched Asian giants.

The proposal to harness the Yarlung Zangbo River, which becomes the Brahmaputra River in India, has drawn public criticism in India, where Chinese President Hu Jintao has been visiting.

But China's Minister for Water Resources, Wang Shucheng, said the proposal was "unnecessary, unfeasible and unscientific," and had no government backing, the China Daily reported on Wednesday. "There is no need for such dramatic and unscientific projects," Wang said.

Wang's comments appeared to be part of an official effort to quell Indian fears that China has designs on the river water, a volatile issue as Hu seeks to improve his country's image with its sometimes wary neighbour.

"The Chinese government has no plans to build a dam on the Yarlung Zangbo River," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Jianchao said, according to the China Daily.

The proposal to divert what becomes the Brahmaputra River has been promoted by a group of retired officials, and earlier this year it received a burst of publicity in a book entitled Tibet's Water Will Save China

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/522947.cms

See, their cool :)

Assumptions on a mass scale could have lead em to war. nothing is set in stone,till the chizzles start hammering i guess.

ED-- And see the difference in wordings? the article from upiasia (a project of United Press International) makes china sound all evil and wicked and the indian times is an indian paper, and their alot nicer.

Edited by Jesus On Peyote

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×