ref1ect1ons

I love eckhart, started reading him as a teen. "There are still many people who believe that the problems of this world can be solved if we just think, think harder about them. Have more commitee meetings..., and eventually they can be solved. They dont realise that the problems of this world are there because we have lost touch with the source..., further differentiation (thinking) cannot help, it can only create more problems" I can understand how others may see it as a cult, for example some people feel that to stop thinking would leave them vulnerable to any external influence, that they would lose their sense of self. However I have found the opposite to be true, when there is a space or you put your attention on some stillness, a space opens, your mind ceases and you feel more alive and more your self. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/8025142/Bill-Bryson-Have-faith-science-can-solve-our-problems.html Also here is an article about how scientist can solve and understand every thing.

GMO Crop Catastrophe in USA a lesson for EU by F. William Engdahl* As the European Union moves closer to approving the cultivation of GMOs despite stiff widespread opposition, it ought to be paying urgent attention to the agricultural arms race unfolding in the United States. The gospel of high-tech genetically modified (GM) crops is no longer sounding quite so sweet. Roundup-resistant “superweeds” are plaguing Monsanto crops across southern US states, driving farmers to use more herbicides, abandon their farms or .... return to conventional crops. http://www.voltairenet.org/article166785.html Looks like GMO will hopefully fail before it weeds it's way into Australia, I think the West was talking about it, so hopefully WA will remain GMO free. I LOVE superweeds, nature ..always finds a way

I think it is easier to control these kinds of people with professional/intellectual 'mechanisms'. Because porfessors who come-up with a new idea or even challenge the status quo take a risk, I feel that scientist are keeping their heads down and are afraid to speak-out. The greatest fear an intellectual has is being thought of as stupid, they absolutely resent it, as a large part of their identity, quite understandably, comes from their knowledge and intellect. They are valued for thier knowledge and intellect. So if a scientist speaks out, the media can make them seem 'crazy' or a 'mad scientist', a kook i think is the word. Scientist are afraid of being thought of as kooks in the eyes of the general public, as this is where their self-worth derives. It is certain that there are going to be some dangers with GMO and that these have not been discussed; this is why I think there is some sort of manipulation going on, either through money or other means. The other possibilty, which seems rather implausible to me, is that GMOs are completely safe and scientist arent speaking out as much as they should (nice info, thanks rm) because they are infact safe. Which I dont think is true. But you know, others may choose to believe this, my condolences.

Yes those plants are irresistable. Such vibrant specimens, I can almost taste their potency. Welcome, maybe in time you will allow your unique strain to spread slowly throughout. I wanted to ask as well, but I knew the answer, maybe some of us can get together and bring another strong strain to Aus. I am really interested in the prospect of a strong and slightly psychidelic kava, I hate alcohol so this is appealing. I always liked kava, but find most stuff to be kinda weak. I am going to start searching to this end, I will be checking ebay in hawaii etc, I hope to find a strong strain, is there a way to go about finding a strong strain Casaurius?, any stand out cultivator names where i could start? once again welcome.

I originally assumed it was shopped until I found these.

Wow you have managed to call me a kook and a fanatic (in an indirect way), obviously this is just an artifact of your reasoning style, which is to attack the person's subjective traits, and avoid addressing anything they have to say directly. I understand you are sememingly (not objectively) arrogant, as you to refuse to enter a debate, "because I don't argue with fanatics"; so you don't argue with those who hold 'inferior' beliefs, or beliefs that are threatening to your own beliefs. I have evaluated your journal article fairly and integrated it into my value systrem, it has value. But to suggest that everything I offer has no value, now that's fukin stupid. You didnt even consider the information in the first place so how can you call it 'worthless' and dismiss it as 'conspiracy'. It only apppears to be conspiracy, you have been taught to spot 'conpriacy' or threatening information very efficiently, also called brain washing, as the typical reaction is to reject threatening info. You have misjudged me as a kook, because although you have learnt to identify 'kook's in school, they forgot to teach you to criticise your subjective feelings. If you had done so you would see that I am not a kook, that I am a reasonable and loving man, equal in intelligence and power to you, and am truly worthy to answer you and counter your points. Svarg may have called you a vegetable, but he didnt call me a kook. You have called me, and I will answer.

Argue the fukin point directly. This backhanded ad hominen reference nonsense is BS. Argue each point on it's merit, elaborate the points of the journal article that make your case. Drop the petty BS, or save it for me. So the point of the argument from my perspective was that of a difference between man-made and naturally occuring flouride. Now rahli did not state what source he considered the black tea from, I assume natural (is it an added component?), so I assume the ref rahli provided makes the point that naturally occuring floride is also harmful. I have NOT read the article and do not care to. I am interested in elaborating this part of the article to draw out this point. I am also aware that rahli did not seem, from here, to enter into a debate with svarg about this. Infact you seemed to avoid it by calling attention to svarg's 'refs', while not addressing his point directly. Svarg has said that there is a diff between natural and man-made floride, svarg has said that apatite, is actually very different from the stuff that is added to our water. It contradicts rahli's journal article, as it would suggest that the black tea source SHOULD NOT have produced the effect it did in an experimental design. So basically svarg has to suggest that there is a third or other naturally occuring source that does not produce these toxic effects (simple, our teeth, apatite). And rahli has to explicitly state his point. Specifically whether he believes all flouride to be toxic or not. Or state what he believed the argument to be about. Also is apatite the same as the flouride of black tea? (both natural sources), i think that these would be different again. Although the source may be questionable (i think most uni professors and mainstream scientist are rather questionable also) it has still been reported in a number of places, so perhaps leads back to a good source. On any note the information seems logically sound as it does seem plausible that chemicals produced in a factory would vary, and be potentially more toxic, then their natural counterparts. I have no understanding of chemistry, which is why I didnt sink deeper. I know I dont have the knowledge here. But some of you do and can educate me through your honest and sincere observations. This is all i ask, as i have done.

no never had any probs, ps. the coast is clear...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k4zTAe7TGw&feature=related A judge on prop 19, 35 days to go till the vote. Added counter.

Tis not long brothers, I can feel it, otherwise I will just move to cali, seriously if this prop doesnt pass I have lost hope in humanity. Yeah I liked the movie with all the happy people sharing flowers, but how would we get any work done with all the fukin stoners .

Lycoperdon sp., Coprinopsis lagopus and inocybe were stand-outs for me this time. Another wonderful photojourney LM, many thanks. I really think these would work in a book, as others have said, it is like looking into another world.

I think the solution has more to do with ending the insanity of the 24/7 work work work society. Once people learn to relax every so often they wont need drugs to 'carry' them through the day.

completely unintentionial/unconscious idiosyncrasy. the one in the green shirt does seem intentional however, but think of the consequences of such a notion; ...the repercussions of a secret gesture are simply far-too-great for my current world/self view.

There is not one report on erowid, maybe you can give us a brief description. It does sound intriguing, the only place i could find seed was ebay in chile.

It's not conspiracy theorist, it's citizens and scientist. There's a good doco by citizen investigation team (here) which debunks the story completely with indisputable facts from many eyewitnesses. There is so much evdence of a controlled demolition, including scientific papers (here) describing the discovery of nano-thermite which is made only in american miltary labs, not by jihadist. Building 7 was not hit and has strong evidence of a controlled demolition as with the two towers, they were in free fall which is not possible in a normal pancake collapse even if you neglect the fact that it was the first steel building to collapse from fire. A lot of Engineers who want a new investigation and explain these ideas here: Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. They have heaps of awesome videos, including an ad that was aired an new york as many ppl are unaware of building seven. "Building What" Familily members who lost loved ones speak in this. Why cant you see it was a false flag and the air force was stood down, you've heard this so why do you clutch to the ridiculous fantasy.

Whatabout those aquabounty fish, they are tripoid (have three sets of genes) and are sterile. They are fetilised with different genes using irradiation. Who would want to eat a zombie fish.

I think they have you teo, you nazi eugenicist. When they start sterilising ppl youll justify it with your religious environmentalism. theres a good eugenics doco on utube called maafa 21.

it seems so strange to me that although no reason can be pinned down *moxuxsxsxaxd*, some people still believe the official line and keep those liars in power because of this. The official story is just so completely ridiculous that it just boggles my mind how people can go along with it.

PS that is strange, cause when I first got mine, i actuallky did this and a couple leaves fell of. I actually had it in my mind not to use fish emulsion with iboga again, but it was looking pale and i figured it had been a while. I wont use fish emulsion with iboga again.

My leave both fell off after I put fish emulsion on it, I didnt get it on the leaves an it was seasol brand. Why would this happen, they fell off IMMEDIATELY, like after two minutes one fell off, and so I went to spray it with just clean water and the other fell off. It doesnt make sense, T.iboga is the only plant I have trouble with, after a year this happens, it will prob die now. I cant get t.iboga seeds goin and now my plant is dead. Damn t.iboga must have something worth while.

Please put up a stop sign and I or the moderators are welcome to edit this post. But research labs generally only sell to people with an abn and some credentials in chemistry/whatever. So 2c-t-x would be impossible to import here, america has probably got shitloads though.

That link was bs blowng (no offence, i really welcome your rebuttal to make me think), I have read that twice now, and although I believe it IS his reality, I dont think it is the Truth. It is his choice and his story. He has no fredom. He seems to be describing Lucifers reality. Lucifer is not a problem, just some people choose that reality and some people choose love. I think humantiy might be at an intersection, where we make a choice about where we want to be. These guys want as many ppl as possible to choose them, but I never have and never will. I have always felt a 'guiding' force, and believe in God in my heart of hearts. My creator is nothing like what this man describes, he doesnt have need of knowledge that is only for some and not others, infact it requires no knowledge at all. Lucifer has secrets and hierachies, he is just another choice. Some people will choose that, I can only have compassion for them. But I will not let this fool decieve me, no matter how intelligent and no matter how much 'secret' knowledge he has. Secrets are all lies! I hope my personal interpretion of God does not impose on anyone, I realise that i have defined the boundless in some of my descriptions but only with the realisation that it, too, is only a relative Truth and not the undefined Silent Truth that is for all.

Even though you might not believe in them.... they certainly believe in you.... and your belief systems are of little to no concern to them whatsoever. And so you know, when I get inside those realms... and I do the work that needs to be done...... im doing that for you.... im doing that for everyone.... we all are....... all of us crazies with the wild imaginations..... because for us it's not a matter of believing.... it's a matter of knowing. I didnt know CS but what a mind. I am sorry if this is an intrusion, so I will just say love and light for your journey CS.

Some awesome docos I have watched recently. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASrFufnMNDg Very sad doco about abortion. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKIQseWt7AQ