Wood Chuck Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 I think Macrogonus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 wachumacallit Posted May 26 Share Posted May 26 Last I checked, both T. peruvianus and T. pachanoi were (officially) considered subspecies of T. macrogonus. Isn't "macrogona" simply the plural form of "macrogonus" -- essentially one and the same classification? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Wood Chuck Posted May 26 Author Share Posted May 26 6 hours ago, fyzygy said: Last I checked, both T. peruvianus and T. pachanoi were (officially) considered subspecies of T. macrogonus. Isn't "macrogona" simply the plural form of "macrogonus" -- essentially one and the same classification? Thankyou, as I wondered wear Marcrogona came from. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
Wood Chuck
I think Macrogonus
Link to comment
Share on other sites
2 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.