Jump to content
The Corroboree
  • 0

ID-found growing in fern from Bunnings


Idon'tstudydinosaurs

Question

19 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Very nice!

I guess it could easily be a slightly odd looking P. subaeruginosa, I tried to find something that would fit better, but no luck. Still, you should preserve a piece of tissue if you one day find someone who would want to look at it under the scope.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Bwahaha, just in case the Bunnings nursery staff didn't get enough trippers in there already for their cactus, now we'll all be in there poking about in the fern pots too..

What type of fern is it?

Sorry I have nothing to offer regarding ID - it does look very interesting though, almost good enough to eat.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Take a print!

There are others here with a much better idea than me, but I agree that it does look kind of subby.

Never paid much attention to the ferns in Bunnings - that's going to change now!

Edit: spelling

Edited by Yeti101
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Spore print won't be of much help in terms of identification in this case, many Psilocybe have spores of similar shape and size. But someone with knowledge and experience might be able to determine the species based on cystidia and basidia, thus a tissue sample.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I have also noticed that the bruising is not instant. It takes around half hour to turn blue.

The substrate is also mostly woodchips,no manure has been used.

Temps under the patio have been mild for summer (25-30C).

They just keep popping up.

Does this delayed bruising point to any species?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

You should ask Alan Rockefeller either on facebook or Shroomery. He's a go-to guy, (he's a very active mycologist), for psilocybes and should be able to put you on the right track.

https://www.facebook.com/alan.rockefeller

http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showprofile.php?User=169393

I am nowhere near a psilocybe expert but it just doesn't look quite right to be a psilocybe to me.... The stipe and top of the cap look a bit off. Could be the pics, or my interpretation of them and lack of knowledge.....

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I don't think these are P. alutacea as they have a pronounced nipple on the top of the pileus, and these don't.

These do resemble a yet to be named Psilocybe sp. that has been found in potted plants before. It's close to P. moravica but is probably somethng different.

Some links:

https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/14381066#14381066

http://mushroomobserver.org/7388?q=2hrpI

You should save and dry a specimen for DNA sequencing. Contact me if you want to sequence it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

i suppose you know moravica=arcana=serbica=boemica , huh?

I'd love it your subs to be sequenced and compared to serbica, cyanescens and azurescens clusters from europe. plus cyanofibrilosa cyanescens and azurescens from us

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...