KK ID? Nasty looking

[Foo]

Was sold to me as KK242. Doesnt look like the Internets version of 242, interested to hear what others think.

Sorry for crap photos

Obviously not talking about the spach, pach or bridge plants in the first photo

Edited March 30, 2014 by Foo

[M S Smith]

That's the "KK242" from the early days, which is in fact T. cuzcoensis. KK242 is now commonly associated to plants that are in form like T. pachanoi, when in fact it should just be attached to the T. peruvianus plants of Matucana, i.e., the Icaros type.

~Michael~

Edited March 30, 2014 by M S Smith

[Foo]

Thats Mr Smith.

kk242 sounds like a rather pointless name, given that it could any number of sp...