Guest kwan Posted March 11, 2002 If a certain substance was vaporised, would it give the same effect as if the same amount of that substance was smoked normally (direct flame) assuming the heat of the flame does not destroy any of the constituents? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theobromos Posted March 14, 2002 Probably not a wise assumption, most substances you might smoke will be destroyed in flame to some degree. Which is why vapourisation is an efficient use of many recreationals. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest kwan Posted March 14, 2002 Is this the only reason that a vapourised substance has more effect for the same amount or is it because there is less smoke, hence quicker absorbtion? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites