chilli Posted February 27, 2012 (edited) There seems to be some confusion about the so-called Super Pedro, and possibly at least two plants that have been labelled as such. Can anyone confirm whether the one referred to in these 2006 posts: http://www.shaman-australis.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=11700&view=findpost&p=104877 and pictured here: http://www.shaman-australis.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=11572&view=findpost&p=103343 is this the same one that is being traded (especially in WA) as Super Pedro? It certainly looks similar, and fits with the description above.. Edited February 27, 2012 by chilli Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Foo Posted February 27, 2012 You linked the same thread twice. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chilli Posted February 27, 2012 You linked the same thread twice. Opps duh! Thanks man, fixed now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Foo Posted February 27, 2012 Wich picture is meant to be a super pedro in the second link? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GoOnThen Posted February 27, 2012 This my super pedro bought from a member on the east coast in 2009 The one behind is another pach x scop for a WA member wich is not super pedro but similar Cheers Got Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chilli Posted February 27, 2012 (edited) Wich picture is meant to be a super pedro in the second link? Good question, the only one i can see that for sure looks similar are the fat logs at the right hand side of the top right picture. Cheers GOT, I can see yours like mine fits fairly well with the physical description in post 4 in the first link. Edited February 27, 2012 by Evil Genius Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Foo Posted February 27, 2012 All this talk of Super Pedro is making me jealous. From what i can see the pictures in link one and Got's cacti look like other super pedro pictures ive seen aroud the place. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chilli Posted February 27, 2012 (edited) Yeah they do look the same, but like I said I have heard that the term may have been applied to at least two different cacti, hopefully someone else with more knowledge than me can shed more light. Edited February 27, 2012 by Evil Genius Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GoOnThen Posted February 27, 2012 (edited) The super pedro is one of the very first non pc pach that I aquired Cheers Got Edited February 27, 2012 by GoOnThen Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Foo Posted February 27, 2012 (edited) Wouldnt surprise me if theres many more cacti out there reffered to as super pedro. See the "ebay sanpedro bargin" thread for an explanation of my thinkings. This thread may intrest you also. Edited February 27, 2012 by eatfoo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Evil Genius Posted February 27, 2012 Alright, i did quite a whole lot of cleaning in both threads and brought this one back. No Discussions about Potency please. Had to edit a very old thread to keep this thread here and i dont like ass-raping 6 year old Threads over something that could potentially be answered by using the search engine as well. Thanks. bye Eg Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bush Turkey Posted February 27, 2012 i wouldnt even call super pedro a pedro. I think its a Trichocereus cordobensis. i got a big log of one from down the road from me T.cordobensis thread>>> http://www.shaman-australis.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=25165 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Foo Posted February 27, 2012 (edited) They look pretty, 'pretty' Edit: Thanks EG for the effort Edited February 27, 2012 by eatfoo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chilli Posted February 27, 2012 Thanks EG for sorting that out, I appreciate it and sorry for making your day harder. As far as UTSE goes though, I read most of the threads here on super pedro and couldn't find an answer. I've got a Lance, Spiny Scop and Super Pedro now... some people say they are all the same but I'm not so sure, the spine color at least is different and looks like the girth too. Anyway, all things considered.. cool plant. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
