ballzac Posted August 10, 2011 So it's a joke? I don't get it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
synchromesh Posted August 10, 2011 Pluck a duck... I thought that Michael Bradley believed that Caucasians were the only group with a Neanderthal ancestry. It must have been his use of the word legacy which gave me the main impression. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blood Trance Fusion Posted August 11, 2011 I find this comment rather disturbing. There are greater things happening behind the scenes. More disturbing than killing? Greater things behind the scenes than the loss of life? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sallubrious Posted August 12, 2011 Remember how they refused to release any pics of Bin Laden dead for a while and then they released that photoshopped pic of him, most of the worlds major newspapers plastered it all over the front page. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tipz Posted August 12, 2011 did NOT need to see that ! ^ 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sallubrious Posted August 12, 2011 did NOT need to see that ! ^ This should make you feel better then. We can all feel warm and fuzzy again now Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ballzac Posted August 12, 2011 I love hardcore pornography, but I have enough respect for those who don't not to post it in a thread without warning. Likewise, I expect those who like to jerk off over pictures of mutilated bodies to have enough respect not to post them without warning. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sallubrious Posted August 12, 2011 (edited) The thread was questioning whether Bin Laden was dead, that photo was posted to show how part of the "evidence" for him being dead was fake so I thought it was perfectly relevant to the thread. As for relating that to pornography and jerking off, that's just bizarre ballzac. If I ever get the urge to jerk off over something like that, I'll be sure to post a warning. Edited August 12, 2011 by SallyD Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tipz Posted August 12, 2011 (edited) it is most definately relevant Sally, no argument there ! And i strongly believe many of his recordings and photos have been adulterated in the past. The technology to manipulate images these days is now at the point where even experts have trouble picking the fakes. The one above is batantly obvious. 'I' just think really offensive images should have a link followed by an explanation of content and perhaps a warning of graphic images, that way those with the stomach for it can still view the 'relevant' content and those that dont wish too see such things at least have a choice in the matter. Its just being considerate. Edited August 12, 2011 by tipz 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slybacon Posted August 12, 2011 The Bin Laden effect. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mac Posted August 12, 2011 I' just think really offensive images should have a link followed by an explanation of content and perhaps a warning of graphic images, that way those with the stomach for it can still view the 'relevant' content and those that dont wish too see such things at least have a choice in the matter. Its just being considerate. Ditto Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
