Hendry

So true! its almost as if the shows producers for political reasons have decided to exclude killing animals and eating them from the show. They need to incorporate better trapping methods and show more hunting/trapping less gathering. Killing animals in traps and showing viewers how to make weapons to kill them so you can live might not be PC enough for television? but at least its real... If only his "non existant" crew wasn't wasn'tsecretly feeding him he would have been dead ages ago. He prolly goes back to his nearby trailer everynight to snort yay-yo. . I remember one time shooting a rabbit, skinning n cleaning it then immediatley cooking and eating it. Interesting feeling to not be so detached from the food you eat..... I am definitely no expert on survival. i like this following video. ( my keyboard is rooted excuse poor video posting)

Snap! I just ordered some 98% Honokiol (overseas). I hope my parcel is not erroneously cockblocked by the mail Gestapo ? hmmmm.......

Taxes? ...,on landscaping,?,.. Come on now,

It doesn't have quite the (kick) of single entity dex tabs. some prefer it... I like dex better myself not by much though? are mixed amph tablets approved here in Aus? I know Dex is (thank god)

I third that! Top quality, carefully packed and shipped out to me at breakneck speed, A class act from start to finish. Their going great guns.

The Original 1978 version of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnkJ7LUIUos Requiem for a Dream (Maybe more creepy than scary ?pretty disturbing film not a good date movie lol)

Feel sorry for the guy........But you have to wonder wtf he was thinking. It's the kind of mistake you only make once.

Every situation is different. I'm a libertarian n don't think anything should be compulsory (for me especially : )

Cute Staffy pups! Its a shame that Australia would rather blame the dog and ban it, instead of prosecuting the asshole dog owners who create these problems. Bust irresponsible dog owners/assholes who fight dogs and send them to jail. These bullshit breed bans are ridiculous. Dog that bite people should be put down. I never owned a pit bull but have friends back in the states who have some really nice ones, they figure that like with any popular dog breed shitty/irresponsible breeding has alot to do with the problems. People should be allowed to own all types of doggies. long as they remember that all dogs regardless of their history have the potential to go apeshit at any given moment and start wrecking shop. Minimise the risk and control your dog at all times. The following is a documentary about the APBT it's history and the assholes who give it a bad name. Off the Chain #1 tip - Shoot the dog. I used to have a rottie who was completley peaceful, just a really all around great doggie, then one day my mom's friend ran over and hugged my dad , he didn't bark at all just bite her once in the leg and let go.Blood was everywhere it was fucking horrible,bite got infected and was bad enought that she couldn't drive her car for a month Wasn't easy to put him down but was the responsible thing to do. Was lucky it wasn't worse.

Just imagine if it were illegal the diagrahm might include a coat hanger. Regardless there is no clean way of killing anything. while I don't think I would feel comfortable preforming abortions myself . . Abortions will happen regardless of the law, Might as well make them safe. In this case as in many the govt is well served to fuck off and let people (women) run their own lives. Now if the Australia Govt could only remove the dead fetus pictures off my pack of cigarettes. ...........it's a bit much

I just had some of my relatives from the states send me 10 tins of Snus smokeless tobacco. It is part of a birthday present. A few unanswered questions remain....... A) Will Chairman Rudd's secret police seize said tobacco and charge me will conspiracy to dip? (punishable by 14-73 years in a Turkish prison) Will the Australian government consider said amount (10 tins) as being significant enough to detain the parcel with the stipulation that Hendry pays a tariff on the tobacco in order to facilitate delivery. Or C)Will the tight-assed bastards working at customs adopt a positive outlook with regards to the parcel merrily sending it on it's way (with the full knowledge that the use of said materials contained within might tend to result in a rapid acceleration of Hendry's life cycle, affording not only themselves but all Australians with a small but measurable reduction in congestion and transit time during the early morning commute. Perhaps I am reading into this shit a little too much.. I can only hope they give it a wide berth But Seriously Any advice is greatly appreciated : )

Hopefully he escaped! Obviously it's the doctors who work at the asylum he escaped from who are the crazy ones. If he had only used an exacto knife to cut out the telemetry device the CIA had implanted behind his left eyeball none of this would have happened. Maybe the cops know he has mental issues and don't feel like "roughing up" a mentally handicapped person who they perceive to be "relatively harmless"?

"Justice Clarence Thomas, who voted with the majority, wrote a concurring opinion in which he made little mention of established court precedents but emphasized that he himself had viewed materials "way, way nastier than this stupid play." "I don't know what kind of bullshit passes for jurisprudence down in the 4th Circuit these days," Thomas wrote. "But those pricks can take their arguments about speech that 'appeals only to prurient interests' and go suck a dog's asshole." Added Thomas, "Just suck it. Get in there and seriously suck it." Nuff Said?

Seems tidy enuff?

what happened????...... C! C)or will the tight-assed bastards working at customs adopt a positive outlook with regards to the parcel merrily sending it on it's way (with the full knowledge that the use of said materials contained within might tend to result in a rapid acceleration of Hendry's life cycle, affording not only themselves but all Australians with a small but measurable reduction in congestion and transit time during the early morning commute. My 10 tins of spit-less smoke-less frosty tobacco-ey goodness arrived completely unmolested.Thank God! fuck paying 100-200 dollars in bullshit tax on thirty bucks of snus. they were prolly too busy looking for the real dangerous shit like Chinese stars and martial arts equipment lol they have to do something about that kind of stuff with the recent increase in Chinese star attacks. Fucking Ninjas... Call to legalize 'snus' in Australia DANNY ROSE, MEDICAL WRITER February 23, 2009 A controversial tobacco product available in Sweden, where lung cancer rates are the lowest in Europe, should be made legal in Australia, an academic says. Snus is a moist powdered tobacco product that is not smoked, but placed under the lip, where nicotine is absorbed into the blood stream. It has lower levels of the carcinogens found in conventional chewing tobacco. It was banned in 1991 as part of Australian efforts to reduce avenues for the expansion of the tobacco industry, but Dr Coral Gartner has called for the ban to be overturned. Dr Gartner, based at the University of Queensland's school of population health, says it could help cut the human toll among people who can't or won't quit smoking. "Your best course of action is to quit smoking, but if you're not going to do that then this is second best," Dr Gartner said. "And, if cigarettes are still going to be available then it seems reasonable to allow these people another option that is a lot less harmful." Snus is outlawed across the European Union but due to exemptions is still manufactured and consumed primarily in Sweden and Norway. Sweden's smoking rate dropped from 40 per cent in 1976 to 15 per cent in 2002, meanwhile snus gained in popularity and 21 per cent of Swedish men are now daily users. Despite this, Dr Gartner said the country recorded no increase in the rates of oral cancer or cardiovascular disease, and tobacco-related deaths in Sweden were among the lowest in the developed world. The Swedish example showed a tobacco addict who used snus had a lower risk of all smoking related cancers, she said. "There might still be some residual risk of pancreatic cancer and oral cancer ... but that risk still seems to be lower than what you get from smoking," Dr Gartner said. It also did not appear to act as a "gateway" to smoking, she said, as the Swedish experience was that more smokers moved over to snus than the reverse. Snus, along with similar products that come in the form of a compressed tablet, was also a less visible way to consume tobacco than smoking, helping to denormalise tobacco addiction in the public's eye, Dr Gartner said. The tobacco industry could still be prevented from advertising it if legalised, she said, and its introduction could allow a fresh tightening of cigarette regulations. "I'm not saying let's make it legal and off you go. I'd say we have another option for smokers now and let's ramp up the regulation of cigarettes," Dr Gartner said. "I understand there might be concerns about bringing in more tobacco products, but (at the moment) we've got the toughest regulation possible on these products which are actually a lot less harmful than cigarettes are." The Cancer Council agreed that a case could be made on health grounds for introducing snus to Australia, but chief executive Professor Ian Olver also said more research was needed. Views among smoking cessation experts were split on snus - which, he said, appeared to be a "less harmful" product than cigarettes. "On the other hand, why should we find another way to addict people to tobacco?" he added. "What we do know is (that) in Australia smoking rates have come down very dramatically ... we've done very well without it (snus)." Dr Gartner's views on snus are also outlined in an article, co-authored by Professor Wayne Hall, published online in the journal Public Health. http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/call-to-legalise-snus-in-australia-20090224-8fzf.html

real life Jason Bourne escapes

Confidential sources within the state department claim that a scant 10 minutes into the hour long scheduled meeting between Stephen Conroy and U.S. Ambassador Bleich, Minister Conroy informed the Ambassador that he had to step out for a moment in order to check his e-mail(not before giving assurances that it would take twenty minutes at the most), When offered the option of using one of the office computers. Conroy admitted that he felt more comfortable using his own PC which was only a short drive back to his suite at the Hilton....plus he needed to run some unspecified "proprietary" test software??? that was only on his computer (back at his hotel room). Fair enough?.....One hour later after numerous unsuccessful attempts to contact Minister Conroy via telephone, out of a genuine concern for his wellbeing Ambassador Bleich went to the Minister's hotel room to make sure he was "ok"? Knocking on his door for a good five minutes without reply...then.......a faint voice deep from within the bowel's of Minister Conroy's suite could be heard......I'm busy.........Gimme like 15 minutes. Thirty minutes later unwilling to leave his computer's side speaking through the door from a distant room inside his hotel suite the minister explained that he would be right out..........in 20 minutes. 20 minutes came and went...Subsequent attempts to communicate with Minister Conroy were unsuccessful. The next day a junior aide to the minister contacted the state department and offered the explanation that the Minister must of come down with a 24hr stomach thing and the accompanying explosive diarrhea preventing him from coming to the door. When asked about Conroy's condition and.......what was he doing in there....... taking so long and all? the aide confided that he honestly couldn't say as staff is under strict orders not to distract the Minister from his research by refraining from any attempts to initiate unsolicited contact with him through e-mail,fax,telephone,SMS, or physically compromising his 500 meter privacy/comfort radius and synthesizing a conversation by brute force,He admits he rarely sees his employer, his last correspondence involved an SMS message giving explicit instructions involving the procurement of three packages of Peter Jackson cigarettes and a large size jar of vaseline and a penis pump to be left outside of his dwelling in a nondescript brown paper bag in a manner that afforded the articles easy retrieval at a later time of the Ministers choosing without the hazard of outside observation. lol( The above is a work of fiction) Now the real article- Australia pushes net censorship in Washington ASHER MOSES April 23, 2010 Australian government representatives have recently met US officials in Washington to discuss concerns over the forthcoming internet censorship regime raised by the US ambassador to Australia and the US State Department. Communications Minister Stephen Conroy has come under increasing pressure to reveal the content of discussions with US officials after the US State Department said it had "raised concerns" with Australia and the US ambassador said net censorship was not necessary. On ABC's Q&A program this month, US ambassador Jeffrey Bleich said the same goals set out by the government on cyber safety could be achieved without censorship. Bleich said the US was willing to "share our efforts" with Australia. Advertisement: Story continues below He said: "The internet needs to be free. It needs to be free the way we have said the skies have to be free, outer space has to be free, the polar caps have to be free, the oceans have to be free. They're shared resources of all the people of the world." In a letter to Foreign Minister Stephen Smith, Queensland Liberal Senator Sue Boyce pressured the government to release more details of its discussions with the US. Conroy had said that the US State Department asked for "background information only" on the filtering policy. "I find it difficult to reconcile a statement that the US government had 'raised concerns' with Minister Conroy's assertion that the US government had only asked for 'background information'," Boyce wrote. "It is a deplorable situation when Australians have to rely upon the frankness of a foreign diplomat to provide information about bilateral discussions on a very important matter because relevant Australian ministers either dissemble or just refuse to say anything." A spokeswoman for Smith directed all requests for comment to Conroy's office. Conroy's spokeswoman confirmed that Australian and US officials "have met in Washington to discuss the issue recently". The spokeswoman would not reveal further details of the discussions but questioned Bleich's comments that Australia's goal was to capture and prosecute child pornographers. "The government has never claimed ISP filtering is about catching paedophiles; it is about blocking inadvertent access to abhorrent content which includes child sexual abuse content," Conroy's spokeswoman said. "Australia is not alone in its approach and we applaud the European Commission that announced just last week that it would require members states to ensure that websites containing child pornography are blocked." The government plans to introduce legislation to enable the internet filtering policy in the second half of the year. It will require ISPs to block a blacklist of banned "refused classification" (RC) websites for all Australians. Unlike the system in some other countries, which is typically limited to child porn, it is feared the Australian model to block RC content is much broader and will cover innocuous material such as euthanasia and abortion sites or graffiti videos on YouTube. Conroy believes he is simply applying offline classification rules to the online world, saying you can't access RC material on DVD, in libraries, at the cinema, on television or at newsagents. But unlike in those mediums, the internet blacklist will not give citizens the chance to find out what is censored and why. Critics of the government's policy, including Lake Macquarie councillor Anthony Birt, who has written to Liberal MPs imploring them to oppose the legislation, say the filter will not address the major cyber safety concerns of parents. Colin Jacobs, chairman of the online users' lobby group Electronic Frontiers Australia, said he was mystified as to why trying to regulate the global internet like an Australian newsagent was a priority for the government. "As the dialogue with the US indicates, trying to do so is doomed to fail and completely ignores the enormous benefits we reap from keeping the internet open," Jacobs said. "They are now defending the policy on the basis that it will stop people 'accidentally' stumbling across abhorrent material. That's an astoundingly weak justification for more censorship, and the filter won't even be able to accomplish that." Birt questioned whether children were, as Conroy claims, stumbling across child pornography and noted that the filters would do nothing to stop the distribution of child porn over other means such as email, chat programs, BitTorrent and peer-to-peer networks. He said parents who were concerned about content their children were viewing online could already install software filters and website blockers on their computers. "So we have a proposal that will do nothing to prevent the real problem of child pornography, which exists outside the scope of this filter, and nothing to prevent children from real cyber safety concerns," Birt wrote. "And while not achieving its major objective, this system will simultaneously restrict free speech and access to legal content and controversial material on the internet, in a secret way behind closed doors with no accountability." Ads by Google

I'm still wondering if the portion of my post prior to the real article is a bit much? Little concerned that it might tend to be misinterpreted,wouldn't want anyone to get the wrong idea? Not sure if I should remove it. I want to keep things classy? hmmmmmmmm

It's little shit like that (as well as overdose dogs) that get people killed......All in the name of.......safety??? Tell Stephen Conroy to protect us from this site.

lol one of the guys lived …..watch the whole video 1st robbery the guy lived 2nd robbery 2 Dead 3rd robbery 1 Dead 4th robbery 2 Dead Great Doggie! It's pretty scary that they can confiscate a persons dog. How could you reliably prove a dog to be any breed?. Everything is banned in Australia,it's amazing that they can actually find new shit to ban? No doubt the Government is hard at work on this problem

Godspeed weird barking dude. Are pittbulls illegal is Aus?

You can eat small amounts of gold technically anyway : ) If you have a gun sometimes others will share their food with you if you can't find aminals to shoot. Quality dope is essential. It must be stockpiled along with non-sporting firearms in preparation for Zombie attack. Australia is already very multicultural and overpopulated,overpriced as is. They should quit while they are ahead as it is a small country with few cities and it wouldn't take many sickfucks to turn Sydney into the crime ridden shitholes that most metropolitan areas in the U.S. have become. There is no disincentive with regard to raping and or attacking strangers,invading homes and or murdering people in Australia. At least in the U.S. regardless if your potential target is a 95 lb 21 year old girl she could shoot you with a tazer,have pepperspray or take out a gun and have the legal right to blow your dumbass away.People realize that when breaking into a persons home even if you have a gun and a bullet resistant vest you are playing games with your life. If you had a hankering to rob houses /victimize rape people which country would you feel safer in? Unfortunatley Australia is very attractive in that regard. Women aren't even allowed to have pepper spray? Easy pickins This guy helped save the taxpayers alot of money

Gold, quality dope and guns will always retain their value (long term). Apparently Sweden is now a complete shithole or a Multicultural paradise lol? Who would of thunk?It's the rape capitol of Europe. Maybe they let one to many fucktards into their country. That's a shame.

I want to see MMA Meth Martial Arts in th form of Meth Girls Cage Fighting for the product.They could suck the glass dick in between rounds. If the footage could somehow be streamed live into my barricaded apartment (as it's not worth taking me away from spending valuable time with my computer Pron) get a high speed connection, jar of lube and 14-16 Hours min of quality time to spend with your computer......now were talking....20 Bucks of the girl with more teeth!

You would think so but it's the same drug variations only in name. Names for dextroamphetamine include d-amphetamine, dexamphetamine, dexamfetamine, and (S)-(+)-amphetamine, Dextroamphetamine(U.S.) vs Dexamphetamine (Sigma Australia) in the same way that (Desoxyn)Methamphetamine (U.S.) is spelled Methylamphetamine (Australia) Methamphetamine (pronounced /ˌmɛθæmˈfɛtəmiːn/ listen) also known as metamfetamine (INN), dextromethamphetamine, methylamphetamine, N-methylamphetamine, and desoxyephedrine) The Australian Dex made by Sigma is a finely crafted product. LOL Faustus Hear Ye Hear Ye..........More Cuntz smoking Meth n Wheelin it!