Jump to content
The Corroboree

DualWieldRake

Members2
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    751

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Posts posted by DualWieldRake

  2. Posted · Edited by DualWieldRake

    It may wants to pick up growth like TheMooseZeus mentioned, not having put up defences for harsh situations (i'd expect sunlight or uv seeing your temps)

     

     

    In this case it should "grow out of it" soon enough i guess

    • Like 1

  11. Posted · Edited by DualWieldRake

    IMO it's all good

     

    And obviously if you want another harvest leave some behind/plant the seeds, or wait for nature to present a new and improved version :P

    • Like 1

  13. Posted

    9 hours ago, Micromegas said:

    the agglomeration theory does have some potential for changing some parts of the archaeological paradigm

     

    It already has been changed, that microcstructure research was done in 2006 to test davidovits theory

     

    Ofcourse things don't come out of nowhere (everythings connected)

     

    I'm all pro scepticism, as long as good arguments are put on the table

     

    9 hours ago, Micromegas said:

    People get very sensitive about what they think they know because of how it informs their identity and can have disproportionately strong reactions to even minor challenges to how they think

     

    I wonder how this relates to the folks from the documentary that  @Insequent linked

  14. Posted · Edited by DualWieldRake

    Whatever you wanna call things

     

    Matter of the fact is

     

    20 hours ago, Micromegas said:

     it was only the highest level blocks that were cast from the limestone concoction, while the lower blocks were hewn from nearby quarries, as per the standard theories of 'conventional' (i.e. paradigmatic) egyptologists.

     

    This is an assumption, if you had read the paper all the tested samples contain anomalies, just some not tested blocks 'look like they have been quarried' on a picture

     

    ?format=750w

     

    Besides the science this picture is pretty obvious don't you think?

    It's a ground level block from the khufu pyramid

     

    And some more interesting points in this video

     

  19. Posted · Edited by DualWieldRake

    On 29/09/2018 at 12:07 PM, Micromegas said:

    i'm all for questioning the 'mainstream' and it's important to do so, but there's limits, because the 'mainstream' is actually the product of hundreds if not thousands of years of investigation. paradigms don't get frequently overturned, they are slowly evolving. For example, the sphinx won't end up being 20k yrs old, but its state of preservation may indicate a period of rapid erosion by water during recent fluvial period of short duration (such as the medial climatic optimum), and this fluvial period may end up being politically important, a marker of its own paradigmatic importance... and these Bosnian pyramids won't end up being made by humans. if something is too far outside the paradigm it is not usually accurate, because the 'paradigm' is a collaborative effort where these speculative theories are left field. But the interest is commendable. my general feeling, read all the standard stuff first because it's the best approximation.

     

     

     

    This makes no sense at all.

    What are the limits?

     

    Thousands of years of investigation? really?

    We don't even know currently what happened thousands of years ago.

     

    New discoveries are pretty much outside of the paradigm by definition.

     

    The egyptian pyramids are made from concrete, this has already been backed up with analysis of the microstructure of the blocks.

     

    The arguments against the bosnian pyramids are weak imo.

    It's like saying the egyptian pyramids are natural rock formations cause similar formations can be found in the area

×