curaezipirid

Last time I posted into SAB forum, I think it proved somewhat worthless, so am unlikely to do that again anytime.  But just in case anybody truly interested, (or likewise "invested" as no doubt, I am indeed invested, and yet without any monetary transactions over which such investment takes place), wanted to get to the bones of the picture, it goes like this.  I was angry enough to put off doing a definition up online of homeopathy by one week, and instead referred anybody really truly interested, to the Australian TGA definition in their glossary, but which definition can be particularly misleading.  The way I might define homeopathy is exceptionally long winded however, and quite boring, especially so in the mind of anybody who wanted a predetermined outcome of insidious evil embedded in guise of homeopathy as evidence against the good practice of homeopathy.  Yet I persist and persistently call myself a homeopath, despite so much negative reputation being associated with that title, as that nobody much wants to try making an income out of it in these times.  However, the point of my posting this sweet status note here, is a link to my correcting of the TGA definition.  It is absurd.  Both TGA definition, and my correction.  Splendidly absurd in fact.  Point being, I can't take myself seriously enough that you need to, so why worry, as I won't either.  And here is the link for avid readers of my strange point of view, from which vantage homeopathy and Changa might have much to communicate with one another, if only anyone could be bothered in this daft community. https://curaezipirid.net/blog/something-disallowed-divulge/