he doesn't have a hope in hell of actually doing the job wellhe doesn't have a hope in hell of actually doing the job well
this is bollocks that a father cannot be a pretty good father, at least compared to a 'mediocre' mother.
Astrology (for those who can accept a part of it) underlines this by bringing forth female/mother/motherhood qualities in men and male/father/fatherhood qualitites in females.
So a male with bold Cancer birth chart is gonna be pretty good at being a father, while a woman with a bold Capricorn birth chart is gonna have lots of father qualities, and she's gonna be probably less warm and sensitive as a mother than say, a range of other signs.
Regarding the objectivity of astrology, Darklight, I cannot accept lessons of objectivity from someone who is of the mentality :
"why can't we just live together"
"why are there inequalities"
and the like.
Besides, you should have confronted astrology in the appropriate thread, but I remember you believe in the stars, so the smartass comment about the monolithic objectivity of mine got smashed on the monolith.
If you can though, I urge you to challenge my objectivity using any of my written stuff here.
If I recall correctly my reply was to your statement where you suggested that another member here should just get over a DV issue
No translation issue, yeah I was being ironic
You brought it up, DV, I just said that sexism is usually / probably stemming from butt-hurt males . Some female hurt them sometime and they decided to hate all women.
Plus yeah I did not understand your comment "worse justification for DV" , which is total shit, cause this aint no justification, nothing justifies a man beating his wife, apart from the very nature of humans + social conditioning of a sexist and crypto-misogynistic society. Maybe we can agree on something ?
But for sure, being hurt from a lady in the past, is no justification for no violent act.
Mutant, you made me laugh when you suggested that homosexuality was abnormal and you were against it. I'm coming out (ha) on a limb here to ask why you call yourself mutant if not to celebrate chromosome changes that make people different?
I never said I was against it. Not very nice of you.
But yeah I thought it was abnormal AKA man-made, I thought it's simply a kind of neurosis, and in a way it really is!
At least you give me credit for doing research and finding out this is 100% natural and pretty widespread too
So in my mind it's important whether a phenomenon is natural, AKA happens in the wild, compared to a clearly man/civilisation based phenonomenon.
But it's not that I am "against" the un-natural, because then I would be against myself communicating through a computer. ALso check comments about my nick.
But because I am a naturalist (AKA nature is the law) , it really helps the categorisation of why we do what we do, it really helps explain the behaviour of the human animal, by dividing our acts in instinctive/natural and other types.
You're asking why I have the name mutant, then. Well its not about the natural evolution mutations.
The name is coming from my and also other peoples state, but I will explain it for me. Its mutant as a hybrid of the natural and the mechanic, the technology, you name it. Its a hybrid like Robocop, that kind of mutant I mean.
I love nature and all natural. And I love synthersizer sounds, electronics, I learn through computers and I am very curious about why is this and why is that and how this functions and shit..
So its a concept of bonding between worshipping nature and using lots of technology , and being able to still feel a natural hybrid of this world at the end of the day, where the natural becomes one with the un-natural.
Or something like that....