How to recognize a huanucoensis
Posted 21 August 2007 - 01:29 PM
It can be insanely variable even within one form depending on where it gets grown.
It gets easily as fat (and often fatter) as any peruvianus. It can have no spines or long spines but usually not many per areole.
It looks sort of like a sparsely spined macrogonus and sort of like a bridgesii on steroids.
I'll get a bunch more images posted but want to focus on where this all started for me before returnign to this.
Here is one for starters. Please be patient with me for more images as they will come.
huanucoensis_HBG.jpg 22.79K 106 downloads
Posted 21 August 2007 - 05:08 PM
The only lonely bioassay I am aware of reported it a stimulant but not hallucinogenic but perhaps a larger amount should have been used.
To me it would be a surprise if at least some did not turn out to be nice.
Posted 21 August 2007 - 06:23 PM
i love huanucoensis as itīs a stunning plant! Itīs not really a rare form in germany but itīs rather rare that you get one that is labeled correct. I would love to see some more pics as this is one of the most interesting Trichs i know.bye Eg
www.troutsnotes.com - More than you need to know!
Check out my Trading Blog: http://www.shaman-au...=blog&blogid=18
Posted 28 August 2007 - 02:00 PM
Posted 29 August 2007 - 06:17 AM
Posted 30 August 2007 - 01:43 PM
Give it a more mineral rich blend with less food sources, more mycorrhizal and bacterial support and less space around its roots and it will get fatter and more typical. Providing a more natural soil mix, restricting the space around the base of the plant and ceasing to repot once they get into 5 gallon pots unless the stem fills it is a really good thing for getting container grown plants to look less pumped and encouraging flowering.
The Huntington's gets that nice blush on it due to having solid shade for part of the day and sun for part of the day and being watered with a sprinkler.
Its a rather variable plant depending on where it gets grown. Grow it in more shade and it can get almost unrecognizable as it can almost stop putting on any spines.
I should get busier with uploading images from different gardens.
Sacred Succulents got theirs from Ed Gay who was a friend of Johnson and Hutchison and other old timers (all of whom are now dead).
Here is a shot of one that is the same clone as Michael's pictured above but being grown in a different mix
HUANUCOENSIS_4.jpg 64.28K 98 downloads
Edited by trucha, 03 September 2007 - 08:33 AM.
Posted 30 December 2007 - 10:25 AM
Edited by Teotz', 30 December 2007 - 04:42 PM.
Posted 30 December 2007 - 11:21 AM
Edited by mark80, 30 December 2007 - 04:30 PM.
Posted 30 December 2007 - 12:16 PM
Edited by Teotz', 05 January 2008 - 02:37 PM.
Posted 13 January 2008 - 01:24 AM
Ha ha ha ha ha, that's one of my really old photos. How about that label on the pencil? Cracks me up!
The same plant is seen in post #6 above. And here it is again....
The photo below isn't too great, but sort of fun.
Edited by M S Smith, 13 January 2008 - 01:27 AM.
Posted 15 January 2008 - 04:06 AM
It's a very pretty cactus.
What do you think it's closest relation is Mr. Smith? T. peruvianus?
Posted 16 January 2008 - 02:32 PM
Posted 16 January 2008 - 03:05 PM
It's like 5-6inchs across!
I'll try to post pics soon...
Posted 07 July 2008 - 03:44 PM
Posted 24 October 2008 - 06:01 AM
The tag reads Trichocereus aff 'Huanucoensis'. Peru #80361
The following is from trouts notes Trichocereus aff huanucoensis
suspected to have come from Harry Johnson according to Jon Trager
I am also enclosing some pictures of their specimens of 'Huanucoensis'.. Pics are for size not detail. My camera sucks.
Posted 01 February 2009 - 03:38 AM
The Huntington has no data on this, nor on their peruvianus, nor on their macrogonus. Apparently someone lost, stole or misplaced their data cards in the Huntington archives some years ago.
The aff. huanucoensis looks very much like a typical pachanoi in Peru to me but I have yet to see it flower or fruit.
I love where I live but sometimes wish the HBG was not more than 8 hours drive away from me. I try to make a few trips there each year but all are mere snapshots of time.
I've been collecting data on flowering and fruiting periods whenever possible though so if anyone living in the LA area wants to help with it a joint photo collection effort might be possible. Same story with UC.
Posted 14 March 2009 - 08:14 PM
here is picture of a new tricho i just cut from a large stand i found in a back yard here in san diego california which i have been told is huanucoensis is it or is not please let me know what you all think,
thanks in advance jim in san diego
Edited by gotcacti, 14 March 2009 - 08:18 PM.
Posted 13 September 2012 - 06:30 AM
Posted 10 November 2012 - 03:42 AM
Several forms grew from Johnson's seeds. Its not just environmental since two of them are at UC in the same garden.
Even if grown out side by side they look different from each other.
They should all fit into the larger concept of pachanoi though (now Trichocereus macrogonus subsp. pachanoi if agreeing with Albesiano & Kiesling's ongoing revision work for resurrecting the genus Trichocereus).
WIth the exception of the one at UC that to me looks like a typical pachanot, they commonly exceed 4.5 or 5 inches in diameter and often reach around 6 to 6.5 inches in diameter. Its rare to find a typical pachanoi in cultivation that is more than 4 inches. Most are even skinnier. Scopulicola too. It can happen but its not as common as being more slender. (Some shading often is crucial for the fat columnar pachanoids to get fat.)
To tell any of these appart from scopilicola an easy and fast way is just grab it carefully with bare hands. Scopulicola can *usually* be grabbed even carelessly without experiencing spine punctures. Its also got a skin texture that is unique and recognizable once familiar with it.
The images posted above of S Cal plants are most likely correctly identified.
Edited by trucha, 10 November 2012 - 03:43 AM.
Posted 23 December 2012 - 03:57 AM