Jump to content
The Corroboree
whitewind

. . . The War of The Gods . . . and we are the last defense

Recommended Posts

The five Ages of humankind - a potential timeline. The myths surrounding the ages of humankind suggest the first was the longest, and the best. The next was shorter, and a little unsettling. And so on.

So, extrapolating from a few well known events in human history, we can make a bit of a guess as to these events and the timelines of the ages. Perhaps.

10,000 years ago - end of last ice age. Homo floriensis becomes extinct.

x4 40,000 years ago - modern day humans out of Africa, extinctions of purebred Neanderthals and Devisonians

x5 200,000 - appearance of first modern day humans in fossil record

x6 1,200,000 - Homo erectus and Homo ergaster were the first of the hominina to leave Africa, and these species spread through Africa, Asia, and Europe between 1.3 to 1.8 million years ago.(Wikipedia)

x7 8,400,000 - 7 Ma Hominina speciate from the ancestors of the chimpanzees. Both chimpanzees and humans have a larynx that repositions during the first two years of life to a spot between the pharynx and the lungs, indicating that the common ancestors have this feature, a precondition for vocalized speech in humans (Wikipedia)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I sort of think.. like, the original "Eve" right, the one who drank from the tree of knowledge, must have been the real progenitor of the human species. She must have been exceptional, for this to be in the historical record (back to Sumer). So, without divine or alien intervention, from an evolutionary perspective, her mutation would have spread to her offspring. And then out into the local tribe. And then out into the population as a whole - which was already global, according to the bits I have pieced together from paleolithic finds. But since we have been breeding with Neanderthals and Devisonians up til 40,000 years ago, have we had yet another jump about 50,000 years ago, and how did it spread through the general population? The evidence suggests that it would only be available to a smaller percentage of the population, the hyper intelligent, with a larger group of extremely intelligent, an even larger group of very intelligent, down the line. Now, in the past it seems that that the most intelligent were advisors to less intelligent people (whose genetic inbreeding seems to result in very problematic leaders through the generations), but unless these elite managed to band together to produce hyper-intelligent offspring, their own might be less intelligent.

Even into modern times, where capitalism is in control, it seems our leaders aren't actually that smart - the general population aren't smart enough to realise that they should vote for the hyper-intelligent - so once again, these elites must be guiding from the background (hence the constant rumours of Illuminati etc. But even capitalism doesn't seem to harbour the hyper-intelligent, otherwise our biggest corporations would be able to tackle real problems like climate change whilst still keeping capitalism going.

So does this actually infer that the hyper-elite aren't in control, that they are advising from the sidelines, that they are running projects unknown to the rest of the population, or that they have an agenda which is bigger than worrying about the state of the planet and the welfare of it's systems? Would that not infer an alien species in control? Terence McKenna once said, there appears to be no-one in control. Is he right?

In the past, the hyper-intelligent would have avoided war and famine much better than the general population, so our current system still works on a similar basis but because of the capitalist control not every smart person gets to join the elite. Still, one would assume that in ancient times the smarter people would have a greater representation in our population, but this may not be the case nowadays. In some areas, we still have war and famine, but in our own system everyone is supposed to survive. And the breeders, the suipporters of religious ideology and capitalism without thought, are the ones which are breeding faster, thus making our population less smart and less capable of voting for intelligent leaders. This won't work long term.

Unless these people are being controlled by the hyper-elite who don't care too much since they believe that less intelligent aren't important.

But why the inability to tackle climate change and mega-pollution?

Where are the hyper-elite and why aren't they in control?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So. The hyper elite would naturally find themselves in control of the financial system, and capitalism as a whole. They would not find a place in government as this is now in the control (apparently) of the people (in a democracy) but capitalism is it's system, where rules are in place but created by the elite. Corporations also control the government by and large.

But this does not appear to be the case. I have spoken to a few business leaders and they are obsessed with finance and money. To the detriment of everything else. Corporations are inherently destructive. They destroy the environment, soak up resources, give back as little as possible to keep the population happy and working.

How come the elite are battling it out in this manner. How come they are destroying the planet in such a way, our ability to survive. How come the elite are in control of a system whose end result is worse than periodic famine and war to clean out the breeders occasionally?

WHAT ARE THEY TRYING TO ACHIEVE?

Surely it can't be power for powers sake. That's a bit boring. They'd want to do something with it, surely. I mean, they do, but it's like pissing about really. If there is that much power knocking about, what would you'd do with it? Surely the only thing of interest, real interest, is deep science and space exploration. These are the new frontiers, the only things worth working on. Still, you'd not want to wreck your planet doing so, if there was any hope in hell of it going wrong. And there seems to have been a slowdown in these areas in recent decades. There is very little vision in our landscape.

Will global catastrophe, leave a wrecked planet but with the general population on average smarter than it has been? Surely a better system could be imagined, invented? Surely, as in Ottoman times, breeding could have been more controlled throughout modern times.

Has freedom made us more stupid?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SO.

We have discovered that we are intelligent and can do shit. Whoopee fucking do.

We are doing so much shit we are destroying the planet.

We have no vision for the future. Surviving from day to day.

We need to create a vision. And it is not the belief in afterlife.

It has to be in this reality. It has to be for us, and our offspring.

Communication. Organisation. Vision. Planning. Advertising.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I sort of think.. like, the original "Eve" right, the one who drank from the tree of knowledge, must have been the real progenitor of the human species. She must have been exceptional, for this to be in the historical record (back to Sumer). So, without divine or alien intervention, from an evolutionary perspective, her mutation would have spread to her offspring. And then out into the local tribe. And then out into the population as a whole - which was already global, according to the bits I have pieced together from paleolithic finds.

But intelligence from this perspective must be sporadic and cannot be universal, even if we appear to be similar externally. And did we have yet another jump about 50,000 years ago, another Eve, or an Adam, and how did their genes spread through the general population? How many times has this happened and does intelligence take different forms? Could combining different intelligence through breeding create a super human?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's shit like this, the Dark Ages of Religion, that have destroyed all information in our historical records

ISIS Razes The City Of Nimrod Where The Tower Of Babel Was Believed To Have Been Built

http://shoebat.com/2015/03/05/isis-razes-the-city-of-nimrod-where-the-tower-of-babel-was-believed-to-have-been-built/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

razing, recycling, rebuilding, building over the top, recycling materials

floods, fire, erosion, ice

asteroids, volcanoes, tsunamis

natural revegetation

covering of the ancient cities with the global sea level rise

ice ages

Edited by whitewind

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×