New creator beings

[courage]

So imagine the first thought of existence was lonely and self identified leading to a separation in consciousness

Imagine the completion of this was a family of creators in their own right

What are the original intentions of the earth and how can they be restored?

If there are creators on the earth what are they doing and how can they move past their inclination towards self identification?

[BedOSpines]

So what exactly is the first thought?

[etherealdrifter]

moving past creating

they saw no use for debating

their ship was laden and late

their intentions were survival

chains were removed and

their genes were renewed

fuel for the cosmos

power for their travel

no

the need for explanation

their mole hole was

pure

restoration

it

was neither their sole intention

nor their true aim

last in line was their impetus

and

home was their goal

survival......

not revival

[theuserformallyknownasd00d]

So what exactly is the first thought?

Isn't that what he's asking ?

Edit ; eth bruv where did they get they're chains from? ;)

Edited April 8, 2016 by theuserformallyknownasd00d

[mysubtleascention]

always -

a pleasure

.. waving

my particles !

[BedOSpines]

Isn't that what he's asking ?

Edit ; eth bruv where did they get they're chains from? ;)

I honestly can't tell lmao.

[FancyPants]

Self-replication inevitable to the "Universe's" Creator, as it is to us, each and every mind which at some points in "time" stretches enough from dual materialism until it splits. Mitosis of Original Self, into a slightly different one, two names thus required from here. Does this happen to the characters of our dreams and fantasies? Where does it end? Does it have a start? We're always in the middle. Perspective says so.

[Conv3rgence]

So what exactly is the first thought?

"What the fuck?"

[Conv3rgence]

Duality.

1 from 0

Everything from Nothing

Everything observes its own reflection upon the infinite mirror of Nothingness.

All that is?

Who am I?

And so begins the path of the fool.

Edited April 8, 2016 by Conv3rgence

[MountainGoat]

My take:

Let's call "First Thought" Source. Source could not experience itself because it is whole and all that is, there was no external stimuli from which to experience contrast... So, in order to experience itself, it needed to seperate into fractions of the whole in order to be have experiential points of reference to 'bounce' off each other. For Source to observe the most experience of itself possible, those fractions need to be endowed with the capacity to be creators themselves....

So for me, the original intentions of Earth is simply experience. Life is just a game. It is not serious, unless we decide to allow it to be so. That intention can be restored by realising that experience is the intention. It is not the endless repetition of the same experience over and over again. Like working the same shitty job for 30 years, or thinking the same way for extended periods of time, or exhibiting habitual behaviours. These are simply limiting the experiential game. We can play every role, be everything.

The Earth is full of creator beings, every point of consciousness is one. They are all creating, though few are aware of it. To transcend Self-Identification, One must realise that by searching for identity, we are limiting ourselves. Every identifying factor is actually a limitation; "I am this..., I am not this....". Consciousness has the potential to be everything.

For me, to get past the drive for self-identification, the realisation that this drive doesn't lead to complete happiness is imperative. One might reach 99% happy, but there is always a deficit from 100%. And this is because limitation (identity) doesn't feel good, true freedom is bliss. So there is a progression of the individual consciousness on Earth, from the search for identity to realising that this does not complete the cycle, to surrender of 'self'. When you have played that game of self-identifying enough, there is the realisation that the next experience is to dissolve that identity again to realise infiniteness. Once One dissolves their identity, they can really start to live as true creators flowing with that original purpose. And yet, at the same time, the game of self-identification is part of the experiential progression... Being infinite would not have the same flavour if One didn't first experience limitation.

However, the dissolution of identity (or self) is the most painful and frightening thing possible in life. It is fraught with fear, anxiety, trust and faith. It is to release all attachment to One's self-worth in order to realise that One is beyond value.

[BedOSpines]

"What the fuck?"

that's what I was going for. The first sentence seems to be nonsense. Unless you can clarify?

[plantlight]

that's what I was going for. The first sentence seems to be nonsense. Unless you can clarify?

I thought it was a joke answer and in someway true and as good an explanation as any. Haha, the first thought was: "What the fuck?"

[plantlight]

Mountaingoat, very insightful! I've had many thoughts along the same lines but have not, so far, been able to express them as well.

[Conv3rgence]

Mountaingoat i agree. Is it any wonder that the dissolution of ego is a blissful experience? The self, the ego, our search for identity. Each word, each description, is a container. But this isn't to say that identity is 'bad', our entire reality is constructed through our perception, the act of sensing an identifying 'other' in relation to 'self'. This exploration can be as fun or as terrifying as we choose. The 'self', the known, can be a foundation or a prison, or anything in between. The 'other', the unknown, can be a source of fear or inspiration, or anything in between. The truth is what we choose it to be.

[plantlight]

So imagine the first thought of existence was lonely and self identified leading to a separation in consciousness

Imagine the completion of this was a family of creators in their own right

What are the original intentions of the earth and how can they be restored?

If there are creators on the earth what are they doing and how can they move past their inclination towards self identification?

Great thoughts and great food for thought! My thoughts often drift along the same lines but yeah, just haven't been able to nail it down. And maybe, not really ready to nail it down yet. Once the mystery is solved, then what?

[courage]

The our journey truly begins

[courage]

http://www.pfcn.net/Bulletins/The%20Crystal%20Body%20Exercises-%20May%202009.pdf

[courage]

It's the attitude towards the darkness that has kept us safe. Ensuring that we do not delve into it is an important lesson on our journey. The true realisation is that it was all worth it upon completion. Take care.

[courage]

An Invocation, An Intention, An Attention

Please feel free to adapt this in a manner that works best for you. Please do attend to this evening before retiring and during the day as well.

* I call upon my lower, middle and higher self. I call to my highest source origins and connection to the highest levels of true Oneness and Creator of All.

* I invite and call upon the fullest extent of the highest of the correction energies to enter and descend my entire being down to my human levels and beyond.

* I also invite and call upon the fullest extent of the highest of the correction energies to enter and flow through the space between my atoms and create and maintain a continuous flow through the entirety of all of my being.

* I also call to me all the particles of the true light in my being and ask the particles of true light in my being to also call to me.

[MountainGoat]

It's the attitude towards the darkness that has kept us safe. Ensuring that we do not delve into it is an important lesson on our journey. The true realisation is that it was all worth it upon completion. Take care.

Hey Courage, can you please clarify what you mean here?

Because I strongly believe that it has been our attitude towards darkness that has kept us trapped. Any teaching that states that we should not delve into our own darkness is incomplete. It is only a preliminary part of the evolutionary journey. It has its purpose in that it allows One a chance to find and follow their 'light' and 'goodness', and gives direction to people in the early stages of their evolution. However, to truly evolve and transcend limitation, One's 'darkness' needs to be examined and learnt from. It is our 'darkness' that holds the key to our limiting behaviours, thoughts and beliefs. It is from diving into our 'darkness' that we can find and heal our traumas so we can be free.

We have been taught to avoid our 'darkness' because to examine or follow it makes us 'bad'. We have fear that we would not be accepted or loved by others, this is socialisation. However, 'darkness' is simply something that does not align with our higher self or purpose. It is not bad, it is something to learn from so that we can truly follow our path. For example, telling ourselves that we are not jealous does not actual deal with the root of the issue. The jealousy continues even if denied so we can be 'good'. However, if One accepts that jealousy, so that it can be learnt from and integrated, then it can be transcended. If we resist 'darkness' it will persist until we embrace it and pass through it. We know that jealousy is not in alignment with our highest self, and as such it is only illusion. But if we do not accept it we don't actually move forward in our evolution.

We have done such a comprehensive job of denying our 'darkness', that to even find that we actually have it takes focus. Our 'goodness' has become a lubricated response, and for me it took a lot of work just to realise that I did have 'darkness'. Then my personal evolution accelerated dramatically! My own darkness holds the keys to transcend all my limiting beliefs and behaviours. And for that the 'darkness' is actually working for the 'light'....

If you really want to evolve, look at, accept, process, and learn from your 'darkness'.

[Conv3rgence]

Since its a matter of definitions... When you define something you simultaneously define its opposite. Any container must consider that which it does not contain. When you choose to perceive 'good' or light, you are also choosing to perceive 'bad' or darkness. As mountaingoat has said, a big problem for us all is our unwillingness to look at the darkness.

[plantlight]

Courage, I too am interested your response. I agree completely with MountainGoat's counter -- if only I could express my thoughts so clearly!

I feel that I was handicapped by my fear of my inner darkness and only by exploring was able to overcome my fear. I do believe that caution is advised when exploring the dark and we must learn to discern what is nourishing from the toxic but to do so, fear must be overcome.

An analogy I like is that of a child in a playpen, surrounded by protecting walls and given toys to explore. This safe environment is provided to prepare the child for the next level that lies ahead. In my opinion, the proper admonishment for a maturing child in dealing with the next level is to proceed with caution (sovereignty). Contrarily, to teach the child that the next level is to be feared would have a stunting effect (servitude).

[courage]

Hey Courage, can you please clarify what you mean here?

Because I strongly believe that it has been our attitude towards darkness that has kept us trapped. Any teaching that states that we should not delve into our own darkness is incomplete. It is only a preliminary part of the evolutionary journey. It has its purpose in that it allows One a chance to find and follow their 'light' and 'goodness', and gives direction to people in the early stages of their evolution. However, to truly evolve and transcend limitation, One's 'darkness' needs to be examined and learnt from. It is our 'darkness' that holds the key to our limiting behaviours, thoughts and beliefs. It is from diving into our 'darkness' that we can find and heal our traumas so we can be free.

We have been taught to avoid our 'darkness' because to examine or follow it makes us 'bad'. We have fear that we would not be accepted or loved by others, this is socialisation. However, 'darkness' is simply something that does not align with our higher self or purpose. It is not bad, it is something to learn from so that we can truly follow our path. For example, telling ourselves that we are not jealous does not actual deal with the root of the issue. The jealousy continues even if denied so we can be 'good'. However, if One accepts that jealousy, so that it can be learnt from and integrated, then it can be transcended. If we resist 'darkness' it will persist until we embrace it and pass through it. We know that jealousy is not in alignment with our highest self, and as such it is only illusion. But if we do not accept it we don't actually move forward in our evolution.

We have done such a comprehensive job of denying our 'darkness', that to even find that we actually have it takes focus. Our 'goodness' has become a lubricated response, and for me it took a lot of work just to realise that I did have 'darkness'. Then my personal evolution accelerated dramatically! My own darkness holds the keys to transcend all my limiting beliefs and behaviours. And for that the 'darkness' is actually working for the 'light'....

If you really want to evolve, look at, accept, process, and learn from your 'darkness'.

Yep will do.

I agree with what you're saying. My stance on darkness is that it would be worthless if nothing was learned from it, but I reserve the belief it's origination was unforeseen and will never be allowed to happen again.

Regarding its cleanup many took the stance it was all the 'perfection' of creator as an excuse to give themselves over to the dark side and serve themselves through spiritual mayhem. While I personally have been able to learn remarkable things from my experience I was always of the attitude it should have never been given free reign. Yes, there is much to be gained from both perspectives, but without this attitude some sectors of creation would have been completely erased. I can guarantee you those who gave themselves over are not going to enjoy where their learning takes them.

This is of course my take and other perspectives and opinions will only help develop my own.

Best

[plantlight]

Courage,

Fair enough for now but I'm curious as to the perspective you use to challenge initial intent. I am inclined to believe that the result of any action is either intentional or accidental. Assuming that perfection includes perfect knowledge, I can't get to the place where you start with perfection and end with an accident.

My supposition is that the disarray is intentional. Start with perfection, mix it up, sort it out, back to perfection. - Rubik's cube example.

[courage]

Well it is not something I can comprehend to be honest. Try using your own intention to push your consciousness out there, the above practices will help you to do your own investigations.

The point I am making is just that, in my own discovery the creator is not perfect and the error was unforeseen.