ohcactusisgood Posted July 28, 2015 Just wondering about this one. I got it and another small one that I am pretty sure is Pachanoi. But this one I don't know. Little roughed up one from the hardware store. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 Sallubrious Posted July 28, 2015 (edited) The spines look a bit big for a pach to me. It's looks more like one of the bunnings macrogonus/peruvianus type of things. Seriously I'm hopeless with ID's though, so someone else could have a better idea. Nice plant though. Edited July 28, 2015 by Sally Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 ☽Ţ ҉ĥϋηϠ₡яღ☯ॐ€ðяئॐ♡Pϟiℓℴϟℴ Posted July 28, 2015 looks peruvianal to me. I'ze still at the learning stage of peruvianus IDing though Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 ohcactusisgood Posted July 28, 2015 Sorry, I meant that the other cactus was pachanoi. Which I didn't show. I hope it's peruvianus. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 mystical oyster Posted July 28, 2015 Maybe cuzcoensis? Just a guess 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 Evil Genius Posted July 28, 2015 The plant is just too small. Maybe post it in a year or so. Personally, I agree it could be something related to Cuzcoensis because of the overall appearance/distance between the areoles, etc. But the spines don´t look very typical so only time will tell. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 M S Smith Posted July 28, 2015 Yeah, T. cuzcoensis form most likely. ~Michael~ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 Quixote Posted July 31, 2015 Cuzcoensis, I'd say. Long centrals, spines turning white.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Just wondering about this one. I got it and another small one that I am pretty sure is Pachanoi. But this one I don't know. Little roughed up one from the hardware store.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites