doxneed2c-me Posted February 22, 2015 Please don't jump to conclusions I have no clue where it came from it is in my area at a local store but it is very uncommon to see these types of cacti around. http://imgur.com/3zTDU7T Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 upside Posted February 22, 2015 Looks like a lophocereus schotti,, monstrose? Buy it!!! Then sell me a cut 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 Evil Genius Posted February 22, 2015 Yes, Lophocereus Schottii. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 quarterflesh Posted February 22, 2015 I have 2 rooted cuts. What is the going rate for these? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 upside Posted February 22, 2015 Not sure Quarterflesh,, but let me know if possible. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 zed240 Posted February 22, 2015 I'm curious as to what conclusion people were supposedly going to have jumped to..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 Dreamwalker. Posted February 22, 2015 so whats the 1 next too lophocereus schotti,, monstrose? oh & Dox, last time I ever click on http://imgur.com crashes my old machine every time Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 doxneed2c-me Posted February 22, 2015 (edited) We just never get anything neat around here so I didn't want someone to say it looks like melted wax. Also I read about it and it sounds like quite a curious cactus I will have to check the price. Edited February 22, 2015 by doxneed2c-me Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 franky Posted February 23, 2015 My lophocereus schotii monstrosas are heaps fatter, and that one does not look etiolated as well.. Very interesting Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 zed240 Posted February 23, 2015 My lophocereus schotii monstrosas are heaps fatter, and that one does not look etiolated as well.. Very interesting There are a couple of different versions of L Schotti monstrose. I am not sure if we have the one Dox has shown in his image in Australia as yet (we might). I think Dox's find is called L. Schotti Monstrose var. "mieckleyanus" The other one that is fatter and more lumpy (and is the one I've seen around in Aus) is just L Schotti Monstrose. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 franky Posted February 23, 2015 Ahh all good, I thought he was in Australia lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 pinegapcontrol Posted February 23, 2015 for the ones in oz...Last time i was at collectors corner they were charging 120 for plants about 25cms tall Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 pinegapcontrol Posted February 23, 2015 is L.schotti monstrose and L.schotti monstrose 'obesa' the same thing? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 prier Posted February 24, 2015 there are two different forms of schottii monstrose i know of, one is distinctly fatter than the other. They are very slow to grow and very susceptible to pests and diseases. They are worth a pretty penny for a good reason, a plant like that would have to be in excess of fifteen years old.The other plant in the photo is Euphoriba ammak. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Please don't jump to conclusions I have no clue where it came from it is in my area at a local store but it is very uncommon to see these types of cacti around.
http://imgur.com/3zTDU7T
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites