Jump to content
The Corroboree
  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
doxneed2c-me

Help IDing Columnar

Question

13 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Looks like a lophocereus schotti,, monstrose? Buy it!!! Then sell me a cut

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I have 2 rooted cuts. What is the going rate for these?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Not sure Quarterflesh,, but let me know if possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I'm curious as to what conclusion people were supposedly going to have jumped to.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

We just never get anything neat around here so I didn't want someone to say it looks like melted wax.

Also I read about it and it sounds like quite a curious cactus I will have to check the price.

Edited by doxneed2c-me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

My lophocereus schotii monstrosas are heaps fatter, and that one does not look etiolated as well..

Very interesting

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

My lophocereus schotii monstrosas are heaps fatter, and that one does not look etiolated as well..

Very interesting

There are a couple of different versions of L Schotti monstrose.

I am not sure if we have the one Dox has shown in his image in Australia as yet (we might). I think Dox's find is called L. Schotti Monstrose var. "mieckleyanus"

The other one that is fatter and more lumpy (and is the one I've seen around in Aus) is just L Schotti Monstrose.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

for the ones in oz...Last time i was at collectors corner they were charging 120 for plants about 25cms tall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

there are two different forms of schottii monstrose i know of, one is distinctly fatter than the other. They are very slow to grow and very susceptible to pests and diseases. They are worth a pretty penny for a good reason, a plant like that would have to be in excess of fifteen years old.
The other plant in the photo is Euphoriba ammak.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×