Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Therefore

Anyone have this paper (or access to it)?

7 posts in this topic

I UTSE but im pretty sure it hasn't been posted here before.

Does anyone have this paper:

Chang YS, Mills AK (1992) Re-Examination of Psilocybe-Subaeruginosa and Related Species with Comparative Morphology Isozymes and Mating Compatibility Studies

Mycological Research 96, 429-41. Contact: CHANG Y S ; DEP PLANT SCIENCE, UNIV TASMANIA, GPO BOX 232 C, HOBART, TASMANIA 7001, AUST

thanks in advance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Likewise,

would love a copy.

cheers, Obtuse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks faustus.

semilenceata collection data & all. You will have to get on that Ob.

Edited by shruman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent.

Thanks faustus. your a champ.

i was only thinking about this paper the other day. funny how syncronicity happens.

lol Shruman. yes interesting that.

cheers, Ob.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a bad paper, but the Buchanan one was the best on Australian psilocybes. The Guzman/Watling work being the worst... Ray Watling made some collections of their 'delineated' species purely by location and without a scope.

Amazing how a couple of guys can come to this country for five minutes and describe more species of Psilocybe than most locals have been able to find EVER...

That being said the truth lies somewhere in between; SA Subaeruginosa differe macroscopically and microscopically more significantly than Ps.azurescens does from american Ps.cyanescens...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0