Noveltea Posted August 16, 2002 Hey, Someone was telling me about the possible extraction of mescaline from moutain ash bark-and that aust. was an exporter of alot of mesc. sulfate due to abundance of moutain ash.hmmm Can anyone enlighten me on this topic? sounds strange. slap me across the head if this has already been touched on here! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Murple Posted August 16, 2002 Sounds wrong... Mescaline is found naturally only in various species of cacti and, apparantly, in one species of Acacia - but only in very very low level trace quantities. The same Acacia species also contains methamphetamine, again in traces. Interesting bit of trivia, but useless for extraction. There is however a synthesis for mescaline which is based on a chemical extracted from a Eucalyptus. The Eucalyptus doesn't contain mescaline, but does contain a precursor. Perhaps this is the basis of the story you heard? I haven't heard anything about Australia exporting lots of mescaline, but you guys do have quite a bit of Eucalyptus species there so I suppose its possible that chemical companies are making it there from the natural precursors. For more, see: http://www.rhodium.ws/chemistry/mescalyptus.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yeti101 Posted August 18, 2002 Yeah, I've read that too, only then it was on the end of a "Natural High FAQ" page on The Lycaeum. Still had the suposed Dept of Defense involvement, but the author claimed he had "found" the recipe whilst engaging in naughty hacker activities. Ooh, spooky conspiracy. What did our army need all that funky stuff for , I wonder? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Mesqualero Posted August 18, 2002 Some kind of MKultra setup no doubt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
somnif Posted August 19, 2002 "D. Amos, Australian Defence Scientific Service, Department of Supply, Defence St Maribyrnong, Victoria, Australia." Perhaps a search through the phonebooks and a chat would be appropritate ;-) I mean, it is a rather scary concept that the Australian defense was looking down these paths at a similar time to the MK-Ultra stuff. I wonder what other interesting stuff they were exploring? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ed Dunkel Posted August 24, 2002 I thought I'd paste the Aussie Natural highs FAQ bit for you: EUCALYPTUS Family: Myrtaceae Genus: Eucalyptus Species: diversicolour (Karri) obliqua (Messmate Stringybark) regnans (Mountain Ash) Mountain Ash is the tallest tree in Australia and grows up to 100m. It is found in Tasmania in the Huon Valley and in Victoria in the Otways, Dandenongs and Gippsland. E.obliqua grows up to 90m and is found across southern Australia. Karri grows up to 90m and is found in the sw of WA. FROM THE NET From: anonymous Subject: Mescaline from Gum Trees ---- Hi folks, Whilst browsing chem abstracts yesterday I came across an intriguing reference, especially for ozlanders. The Australian Dept of Defence developed a technique for producing mescaline from eucalypt sawdust in fairly high yield back in '64. Here it is: CA 61,8515 The preparation of mescaline from eucalypt lignin. D. Amos, Dept. Supply, Defence Std Lab, Melbourne. Australasian J. Pharm., 45, 529 (1964) Dried Eucalyptus Regnans sawdust oxidised with nitrobenzene and alkali @ 150C yielded 4% of syringaldehyde. Methylation @ 0-5C for 1hr with Me2SO4, then heated at 70C for 1 hr gave 56% 3,4,5, trimethoxybenzaldehyde. Converted to the cyanohydrin (ie +KCN+weak acid - jm) then reduced with Pd black to mescaline. Overall yield 1% from dried sawdust. E. obliqua and E. diversicolour both gave 0.7% yields. So there you have it. Our army, or maybe ASIO, wanted a way to make vast quantities of mescaline (we have lots and lots of E. regnans, and 1kg sawdust ~20 doses), very cheaply (all the ingredients are chemicals of commerce, except Pd black, which is a recyclable catalyst), from local precursors. Which is funny, since there would have been no difficulty importing precursors or mescaline itself in experimental quantities. Maybe they didn't want to be reliant on foreign suppliers, or maybe they didn't want another country to be aware they were importing mescaline by the kilo. It sounds like we might have had our very own MK-Ultra project running at the height of the Cold War. It would be very interesting to follow this up. Anyone out there know if we had some monkey business going on? Maybe they were even extracting DMT from wattles and turning it into psilocin, eh, J? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- John Morgan Physical Chemistry University of Sydney ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- E D [This message has been edited by Ed Dunkel (edited 23 August 2002).] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Auxin Posted August 24, 2002 Of course that procedure is very dangerous and anyone who is not an experienced organic chemist could really hurt themselves, bad. The cheif culprits being dimethyl sulfate (powerful irritant, causes tumors) and nitrobenzene (toxic by all routes)(and the resulting aniline (an allergen thats toxic by all routes)). Another danger is the occurance of toxic byproducts (like 3,3',4,4',5,5' hexamethoxybenzil (highly toxic) or hydrogen cyanide (violently poisonous gas) via bad synthesis procedures, inadequate protective measures, or a lack of adequate purification. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Mesqualero Posted August 24, 2002 Im glad we have you to tell us what is safe and not safe to do Auxin I reckon we should designate you the SAB OH&S Officer!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Auxin Posted August 24, 2002 Interesting idea mesq. Only problem is I have these moral rules that prevent me from telling people how to synthesise potentially dangerous substances. I only tell people the dangers of what they suggest, as to prevent human suffering. I'm sure this would end up driving some people NUTS when they just want a quick and easy 'recepie' for this or that. Im probably lucky those moral rules are there, if I started telling everyone the safest, most effective way to synthesise drugs the gov. would label me a 'drug guru and co-conspirator' or something and I would be in jail for a long, long time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites