Yavimaya

I think at that price with risk of it not getting in, CSIRO would be cheaper. thanks for the info anyway.

Sorry for bringing up an old thread. Ace, did you ever end up getting any cultures? A few of us over at http://www.backyardaquaponics.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2831&p=523571#p523571 would be very interested in finding a source that is cheaper than CSIRO. Thanks in advance for any help you may or may not be able to give.

its also used in small doses to anaesthetise fish, slightly too high of a dose is lethal to them. Wouldnt be surprised at all if it was a very good antifungal agent.

For me it would have to be The Mars Volta, particularly Amputechure. Quite hard music to get into the first time you hear it, but it really is like nothing i had ever heard before, As someone on thier forums once said, "Its like the answer to a question i didnt even know i was asking".

So are you saying to make one big magnifying glass the size of that mirror array or that magnifying glasses magically "add more sun" to a given area? either way, no that doesnt work.

Sally, i think you mean chop thier heads off, take thier money to pay off OUR debts, stuff the US. lol

Are oxfam really trying to say that if the $240 billion was given to starving people, that they would then have enough money to feed themselves for the rest of thier lives? and thier children, grandchildren, great grandchildren, etc on down the line? To say it would end poverty is silly, it may for 1 year or even one generation, but forever, no way, when peoples cultures arent weighted towards working hard/smart, then poverty will always come back no matter how much money you give them.

Citrus might work well.

So they say that the flowering is "delayed", but they also say that thier first plant is eight years old, thats a massive delay for something that goes through its full cycle in a number of months. I wonder if they are failing to tell us that they need to remodify the plant to get it to flower / ever die.

I would not think minerals would gather in rainwater as it falls, so i woudlnt think there should be any problem with the water being nutrient free.

I dont really understand everything you said there, it is hard to follow. But i am not against a change in the system or for brainwashing, i hate all form of advertising to the point where i refuse to advertise my own business most of the time. All i was saying is that credits are dangerous, they are easy to manipulate, far too easy to produce and cannot be accounted for properly in the current world. the point of posting that video is to show that we already run on a credit system basically and it is screwing everything, there should be no more "money in the world" than there is physical money. I dont really want to take this thread off topic, but a nice comparison to real world "credits" is the credits used in MMORPGs, there MUST be a way of credits being destroyed if the system is to have any sort of balance what so ever, i cannot see anyone destroying credits IRL.

"Possibly the only way that might work is credits. Forget Orwellian inspired 6th amendment freedoms, your not a slave to the government, your a slave to the system and the system is based on the fragile guessing game of printed money. Printed money, gets washed, lost, burnt, buried. I believe that the folly of this is an estimated calculated game of roullette where money must be carefully reprinted as to avoid inflation. That doesnt mean much to you and i, except that we are manipulated by money. Shock horror - what if instead of paying those cadets with money from the government "pool", they are issued.....credits. The credits are dollar for dollar as valuable as real money but exist as controlled numbers." Credits are dangerous. It is what banks use these days to give you your home loan.

That still doesnt make alot of sense, if you meant 80% of the money / power, i think you'll find china has 100% of everything these days.

41oC here today, my Yakons looked F**ked! But my cacti are loving it

Very nice idea, i'd like to know what percentage of current use that could make up, only a very, very small percentage i imagine.

Darren would be off on holidays now, im sure.

Surely not, if so, couldnt the company or manager simply pull the same trick on you, with the same bill, creating a never ending loop?

It is likely to be slugs/snails, but if it is there should be tracks.

The best advice i could give is, buy a nice 1080p projector for your loungeroom and give the gaming addict your old TV.

blood and guts go into landfill? surely all the blood is collected for blood and bone and other products. Surely the guts are all used in cat and dog food?

Didnt know that about curing. There is still no way i would do it with something that can degrade with time/ light/ heat/ moisture exposure, like weed. If i lved where i could bury it in perma-frost, maybe, but i would have to have plenty spare that i would be willing to waste.

No way i would bury my weed, as THC's break down with time, i cannot see it getting stronger in any way. Having grown before and having stored some underground for safety reasons, having it come up mouldy even after going down 100% dry (or as close as i could get in, in the middle of summer) and being in a totally sealed container, i wouldnt leave it there for long enough to try it, not because im inpatient, but because theres a very high likelyhood that you will get 0% smokable weed at the end of it. If you guys mean not sealed, so the dirt can get at it. Well that would end even worse.

Darkspark has the right idea!

Sorry to hear that Woof. My little plant i got last year doesnt seem to have survived the southern winter

I am not a scientist, lets establish that first, i dont work on fake meat. I, nor anyone has any idea what might come in the future because of fake meat. Well, i suppose the easiest way to "explain" it would be. How did diseases/virus', etc form in the first place? If a living creature can get diseases/ have diseases develop simply because there is a host/victim there - with the ability to fight off such diseases, then i cannot see having the same living meat without an immune system as being a good thing. Without acutally having the virus, such meat would be the equivelant of a creature with AIDS, unless pumped full of antibiotics, anything which came in contact with it while it was "alive and being grown" could threoretically infect it, with nothing to inhibit that. Because this would be a mass produced product with no ability to defend itself, it would be open to a wider range of diseases than would not normally effect that "species". I suppose to me, asking how diseases could develop/mutate/ distribute through such a product is like asking how antibiotics can create a super bacteria..... after all antibiotics kills bacteria, its not bacteria steroids.... but humans cannot think of every situation, which is why we have super bacteria when all people wanted to do is kill them. Edit: Spelling.